Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Male Circumcision: A Scientific Perspective.R. V. Short - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-241.
    The health benefits of male circumcision are wide rangingIn this issue, John Hutson has reiterated the conventional Western medical view that “the surgical argument for circumcision of all neonatal males at present is very weak” and he criticises many of the circumcisions performed in later childhood, without anaesthesia, as “physically cruel and potentially dangerous” [see page 238].1 He is also of the opinion that “the diseases which circumcision is able to prevent are uncommon or even rare”. But therein he errs, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Pluralism in Multicultural Liberal Democracy and the Justification of Female Circumcision.Sirkku Kristiina Hellsten - 1999 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69–83.
  • Female Genital Mutilation: A Capabilities Approach.Roksana Alavi - unknown
  • Are There Any Cultural Rights?Chandran Kukathas - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (1):105-139.
    I shall advance the thesis that if there are any moral rights at all, it follows that there is at least one natural right, the equal right of all men to be free. H.L.A. Hart, “Are There Any Natural Rights?”.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  • Female Genital Mutilation.Rida Usman Khalafzai - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (1):1.
    Khalafzai, Rida Usman Female genital mutilation (FGM) is thought to be a custom practiced for the subjugation of women. The significance of FGM for practicing communities, however, is much more profound. The best hope of eradicating this practice lies in the recognition and comprehension of its cultural and social meanings.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations