Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. We should not allow dissection of animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.
    This essay argues against routine dissection exercises on animals under three headings. First, attaining goals of general scientific education does not require dissection. The training of specialists, in whose vocations dissection skills are essential, could then be accomplished without killing animals specifically for the purpose of acquiring those skills. Second, killing and dissecting animals for unnecessary exercises teaches students bad attitudes toward animal life. Third, moral principles cannot justify killing and dissecting animals but not humans; consequently, such treatment of animals (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Ethical decision making about animal experiments.F. Barbara Orlans - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):163 – 171.
    Laboratory animals, being vulnerable subjects, need the protection provided by adequate ethical review. This review falls primarily to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. A review committee's first duty is to identify which procedures ethically are unacceptable irrespective of any knowledge that might be derived. Examples are provided. These projects should be disapproved. Then, "on balance" judgments are assessed that weigh the animal harms against the potential benefits to humans. Several countries (but not the United States) use a classification system (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • We should allow dissection of animals.A. David Kline - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):190-197.
    The focus of the paper is the ethical issues associated with the practice of dissecting animals in lower level college biology classes. Several arguments against dissection are explored. Furthermore, the issue is examined from the point of view of the instructor's academic freedom and the point of view of a student's moral autonomy. It is argued that even though the arguments against dissection fail, it is very important to respect the moral autonomy of students who oppose the practice. Often this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation