Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.
    Equality1 gives rise to challenging questions which are not altogether easy to answer. Is it a relation? A relation between objects, or between names or signs of objects? In my Begriffsschrift I assumed the latter. The reasons which seem to favour this are the following: a = a and a = b are obviously statements of differing cognitive value; a = a holds a priori and, according to Kant, is to be labeled analytic, while statements of the form a = (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   422 citations  
  • Sakya pandita and the status of concepts.Jonathan Stoltz - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (4):567-582.
    : The thirteenth-century Tibetan thinker Sakya Pandita was a diehard supporter of nominalism with respect to abstract entities. Here, two arguments given by Sakya Pandita against the robust existence of concepts (don spyi) are analyzed and elucidated. The first argument is rooted in the Buddhist idea that conceptual thought is unsound, whereas the second argument arises from considerations of intersubjectivity and verification. By presenting these arguments we gain both a fuller picture of the central role played by concepts within the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The sense-reference distinction in indian philosophy of language.Mark Siderits - 1987 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14 (3):331-355.
  • Recognizing Reality: Dharmakīrti's Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations.Georges B. J. Dreyfus & Georges Dreyfus Cortés - 1997 - SUNY Press.
    Dreyfus examines the central ideas of Dharmakīrti, one of the most important Indian Buddhist philosophers, and their reception among Tibetan thinkers. During the golden age of ancient Indian civilization, Dharmakīrti articulated and defended Buddhist philosophical principles. He did so more systematically than anyone before his time (the seventh century CE) and was followed by a rich tradition of profound thinkers in India and Tibet. This work presents a detailed picture of this Buddhist tradition and its relevance to the history of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations