Results for ' classical eyelid conditioning trials'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  27
    Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
  2.  31
    Stimulus fluctuation, reactive inhibition, and time between trials in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):464.
  3.  39
    Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
  4.  26
    Subject awareness in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):431-432.
  5.  23
    Hemispheric processing in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):433-434.
  6.  17
    Intrastimulus conflict in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):428-430.
  7.  25
    Trace and delay differential classical eyelid conditioning in human adults.Susan M. Ross, Leonard E. Ross & Deborah Werden - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):224-226.
  8.  16
    Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
  9.  25
    Interaction of habit (h) and drive (d) in classical eyelid conditioning: H and D as functions of ucs intensity.James J. Hug & John J. Porter - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):150.
  10.  20
    Yoked comparisons of instrumental and classical eyelid conditioning.John W. Moore & I. Gormezano - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (6):552.
  11.  28
    Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
  12.  22
    Effects of omitted versus delayed UCS on classical eyelid conditioning under partial reinforcement.John W. Moore & Isidore Gormezano - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):248.
  13.  28
    Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
  14.  44
    Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy, Harvey C. Ebel & Donald D. Thompson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):138.
  15.  24
    Comparison of trace and delay classical eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Susan M. Ross & Leonard E. Ross - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):165.
  16.  24
    The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning.Sally L. Perry & John W. Moore - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):158.
  17.  25
    Eyelid conditioning performance when the mode of reinforcement is changed from classical to instrumental avoidance and vice versa.Joseph B. Hellige & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):710.
  18.  14
    How long do relational representations in the hippocampus last during classical eyelid conditioning?Donald B. Katz & Joseph E. Steinmetz - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):484-485.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  24
    Differential classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning.Dominic W. Massaro & John W. Moore - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):151.
  20.  24
    Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Gregory A. Kimble, Lucie I. Mann & Robert H. Dufort - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):407.
  21.  30
    Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
  22.  21
    Eyelid conditioning as influenced by the presence of sensitized Beta-responses.David A. Grant & Eugenia B. Norris - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):423.
  23.  6
    The effect on eyelid conditioning of shifting the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):423.
  24.  34
    Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):286.
  25.  19
    Supplementary report: Effect of interpolated UCS trials in eyelid conditioning without a ready signal.K. P. Goodrich, L. E. Ross & A. R. Wagner - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):319.
  26.  14
    Truth and falsity of verbal statements as conditioned stimuli in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):178.
  27.  18
    Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
  28.  17
    Supplementary report: Yoked comparisons of classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning under three UCS intensities.I. Gormezano, John W. Moore & Edward Deaux - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):551.
  29.  16
    Primary stimulus generalization under different percentages of reinforcement in eyelid conditioning.William E. Vandament & Louis Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):162.
  30. Donald L. King.Classical Conditioning - 1983 - In Anees A. Sheikh (ed.), Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. Wiley. pp. 156.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  29
    Conditioned stimulus intensity and temporal factors in spaced-trial classical conditioning.Gerald W. Barnes - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):192.
  32.  24
    Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with mossy fiber stimulation as the conditioned stimulus.Joseph E. Steinmetz, David G. Lavond & Richard F. Thompson - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):245-248.
  33.  22
    Classical conditioning of attitudes as a function of persuasion trials and source consensus.Robert Frank Weiss, Michele K. Steigleder, Richard A. Feinberg & Robert Ervin Cramer - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (1):21-22.
  34.  18
    The engram found? Role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of nictitating membrane and eyelid responses.David A. Mccormick, David G. Lavond, Gregory A. Clark, Ronald E. Kettner, Christina E. Rising & Richard F. Thompson - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (3):103-105.
  35.  15
    Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: II. Effect of successive alternation of blocks of reinforced and unreinforced trials upon the conditioned eyelid response to light.Harold W. Hake & David A. Grant - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):216.
  36.  19
    Effects of differential instructions and number of acquisition trials on extinction and reacquisition of the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):126.
  37.  17
    Intrasession decrements in the performance of the classically conditioned eyelid reflex.Willard N. Runquist & William R. Muir - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):520.
  38. Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems.Robert E. Clark, Joseph R. Manns & Larry R. Squire - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):524-531.
  39.  4
    Caroline Pratt.Trial Flight - 2008 - In Alexandra Miletta & Maureen McCann Miletta (eds.), Classroom Conversations: A Collection of Classics for Parents and Teachers. The New Press. pp. 74.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  22
    Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Harry W. Braun & Richard Geiselhart - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):386.
  41.  18
    Effect of number of acquisition trials and the presence or absence of the UCS on extinction of the eyelid CR.Kenenth W. Spence, Edward F. Rutledge & John H. Talbott - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):286.
  42.  28
    Classical conditioning without discrimination training: A test of the generalization theory of CS intensity effects.G. Robert Grice, Laraine Masters & David L. Kohfeld - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):510.
  43.  35
    Generalization gradients obtained from individual subjects following classical conditioning.Shepard Siegel, Eliot Hearst & Nancy George - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):171.
  44.  10
    A comparison of rate and contingency of classical and instrumental reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of the human eyelid CR.Robert A. Fleming & David A. Grant - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):488.
  45.  13
    Effects of paired and unpaired trials beyond the peak CR on acquisition and extinction of a classically conditioned SCR.John C. Morey, Robert J. McCaffrey & Avrum I. Silver - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (5):259-262.
  46.  12
    Influence of intertrial interval during extinction on spontaneous recovery of conditioned eyelid responses.M. Gordon Howat & David A. Grant - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):11.
  47.  28
    Two-phase model for human classical conditioning.William F. Prokasy & Martha A. Harsanyi - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (3p1):359.
  48.  15
    Probability of conditioned responses as a function of variable intertrial intervals.Karl Haberlandt, Kevin C. Hails & Robert Leghorn - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):522.
  49.  16
    A Logic for Trial and Error Classifiers.Martin Kaså - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (3):307-322.
    Trial and error classifiers, corresponding to concepts which change their extensions over time, are introduced and briefly philosophically motivated. A fragment of the language of classical first-order logic is given a new semantics, using \-sequences of classical models, in order to interpret the basic predicates as classifiers of this kind. It turns out that we can use a natural deduction proof system which differs from classical logic only in the conditions for application of existential elimination. Soundness and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  17
    Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
1 — 50 / 1000