28 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Arthur M. Glenberg [22]Arthur Glenberg [3]A. Glenberg [2]A. M. Glenberg [1]
Am Glenberg [1]Authur M. Glenberg [1]
  1. What Memory is For.Arthur M. Glenberg - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):1-19.
    I address the commentators' calls for clarification of theoretical terms, discussion of similarities to other proposals, and extension of the ideas. In doing so, I keep the focus on the purpose of memory: enabling the organism to make sense of its environment so that it can take action appropriate to constraints resulting from the physical, personal, social, and cultural situations.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  2. Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition.Manuel de Vega, Arthur Glenberg & Arthur Graesser (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
    Cognitive scientists have a variety of approaches to studying cognition: experimental psychology, computer science, robotics, neuroscience, educational psychology, philosophy of mind, and psycholinguistics, to name but a few. In addition, they also differ in their approaches to cognition - some of them consider that the mind works basically like a computer, involving programs composed of abstract, amodal, and arbitrary symbols. Others claim that cognition is embodied - that is, symbols must be grounded on perceptual, motoric, and emotional experience. The existence (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  1
    This Construction Needs Learned.Michael P. Kaschak & Arthur M. Glenberg - 2004 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (3):450-467.
  4.  20
    Gender, Emotion, and the Embodiment of Language Comprehension.Arthur M. Glenberg, Bryan J. Webster, Emily Mouilso, David Havas & Lisa M. Lindeman - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (2):151-161.
    Language comprehension requires a simulation that uses neural systems involved in perception, action, and emotion. A review of recent literature as well as new experiments support five predictions derived from this framework. 1. Being in an emotional state congruent with sentence content facilitates sentence comprehension. 2. Because women are more reactive to sad events and men are more reactive to angry events, women understand sentences about sad events with greater facility than men, and men understand sentences about angry events with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. Reflecting on the Debate.Manuel de Vega, A. Graesser & A. Glenberg - 2008 - In Manuel de Vega, Arthur M. Glenberg & Arthur C. Graesser (eds.), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6. Differences in Action Tendencies Distinguish Anger and Sadness After Comprehension of Emotional Sentences.Emily Mouilso, Authur M. Glenberg, D. A. Havas & Lisa M. Lindeman - 2007 - In McNamara D. S. & Trafton J. G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7. How Intent to Interact Can Affect Action Scaling of Distance: Reply to Wilson.Tamer M. Soliman & Arthur M. Glenberg - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8. Toward the Integration of Bodily States, Language, and Action.A. M. Glenberg - 2008 - In G. R. Semin & Eliot R. Smith (eds.), Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches. Cambridge University Press. pp. 43--70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  32
    Interactive Alignment: Priming or Memory Retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
    Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) interactive alignment model explains the existence of alignment between speakers via an automatic priming mechanism. We propose that it may be preferable to explain alignment through processes of memory retrieval. Our discussion highlights how memory retrieval can produce the same results as the priming mechanism and presents data that favor the memory-based view.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  29
    An Affordance Field for Guiding Movement and Cognition.Arthur M. Glenberg, Monica R. Cowart & Michael P. Kaschak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):43-44.
    An embodied movement-planning field cannot account for behavior and cognition more abstract than that of reaching. Instead, we propose an affordance field, and we sketch how it could enhance the analysis of the A-not-B error, underlie cognition, and serve as a base for language. Admittedly, a dynamic systems account of an affordance field awaits significant further development.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  59
    Embodied Meaning and Negative Priming.Arthur M. Glenberg, David A. Robertson, Michael P. Kaschak & Alan J. Malter - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):644-647.
    Standard models of cognition are built from abstract, amodal, arbitrary symbols, and the meanings of those symbols are given solely by their interrelations. The target article (Glenberg 1997t) argues that these models must be inadequate because meaning cannot arise from relations among abstract symbols. For cognitive representations to be meaningful they must, at the least, be grounded; but abstract symbols are difficult, if not impossible, to ground. As an alternative, the target article developed a framework in which representations are grounded (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. Language and Action: Creating Sensible Combinations of Ideas.Arthur M. Glenberg - 2009 - In Gareth Gaskell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  88
    Radical Changes in Cognitive Process Due to Technology: A Jaundiced View.Arthur M. Glenberg - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):263-274.
    A strong case can be made that the cognitive system is designed for guiding action, not, for example, symbol manipulation. I review empirical work demonstrating the link between action and cognition with special attention to the processes of language comprehension. Next, I sketch an embodied cognition framework for integrating work on language understanding with a more general approach to cognition and action. This general approach considers contributions to action of bodily states, emotions, social and cultural processes, and learning within a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  1
    Enhancing Calibration of Comprehension.Arthur M. Glenberg, Thomas Sanocki, William Epstein & Craig Morris - 1987 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (2):119-136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  28
    Perceptual Symbols in Language Comprehension.Arthur M. Glenberg - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):618-619.
    Barsalou proposes (sect. 4.1.6) that perceptual symbols play a role in language processing. Data from our laboratory document this role and suggest the sorts of constraints used by simulators during language comprehension.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  12
    Cultural Variations on the SIMS Model.Christine M. Covas-Smith, Justin Fine, Arthur M. Glenberg, Eric Keylor, Yexin Jessica Li, Elizabeth Marsh, Elizabeth A. Osborne, Tamer Soliman & Claire Yee - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):444-445.
    Niedenthal et al. recognize that cultural differences are important when interpreting facial expressions. Nonetheless, many of their core observations derive more from individualistic cultures than from collectivist cultures. We discuss two examples from the latter: (1) lower rates of mutual eye contact, and (2) the ubiquity of specific These examples suggest constraints on the assumptions and applicability of the SIMS model.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  21
    Deictic Codes for Embodied Language.Arthur M. Glenberg - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):749-749.
    Ballard et al. claim that fixations bind variables to cognitive pointers. I comment on three aspects of this claim: (1) its contribution to the interpretation of indexical language; (2) empirical support for the use of very few deictic pointers; (3) nonetheless, abstract pointers cannot be taken as prototypical cognitive representations.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  1
    Retrieving Against the Flow: Incoherence Between Optic Flow and Movement Direction Has Little Effect on Memory for Order.Emiliano Díez, Antonio M. Díez-Álamo, Dominika Z. Wojcik, Arthur M. Glenberg & Angel Fernandez - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
  19.  7
    Situated Cognition.Kevin O'Connor & Arthur M. Glenberg - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
  20.  2
    Contribution of Embodiment to Solving the Riddle of Infantile Amnesia.Arthur M. Glenberg & Justin Hayes - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  2
    Extension of the Picture-Superiority Effect Over Multiple Lists.Ronald Barnhart & Arthur Glenberg - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (1):1-3.
  22. Contributions of Mirror Mechanisms to the Embodiment of Cognition.Arthur M. Glenberg - 2012 - In Jay Schulkin (ed.), New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Adaptation and Cephalic Expression. Palgrave-Macmillan.
  23. Framing the Debate.Arthur M. Glenberg, Manuel de Vega & Graesser & C. Arthur - 2008 - In Manuel de Vega, Arthur Glenberg & Arthur Graesser (eds.), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Grounding Symbolic Operations in the Brain's Modal Systems.A. Glenberg - 2008 - In G. R. Semin & Eliot R. Smith (eds.), Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Radical Changes in Cognitive Process Due to Technology: A Jaundiced View.Arthur M. Glenberg - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):263-274.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. The Limits of Covariation.Arthur M. Glenberg & Sarita Mehta - 2008 - In Manuel de Vega, Arthur M. Glenberg & Arthur C. Graesser (eds.), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford University Press. pp. 11.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Test of a Study-Phase Retrieval Account of Modality Effects.Am Glenberg - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):520-520.
  28. Consequences of Joint Action: Entanglement with Your Partner.Tamer M. Soliman, Ryan Ferguson, M. Scott Dexheimer & Arthur M. Glenberg - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (4):873-888.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark