10 found
Order:
  1.  7
    A Theory of Visual Stability Across Saccadic Eye Movements.Bruce Bridgeman, A. H. C. Van der Heijden & Boris M. Velichkovsky - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):247.
  2.  4
    Action and Attention.A. H. C. Van der Heijden & Bruce Bridgeman - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):225.
  3.  3
    How Our World Remains Stable Despite Disturbing Influences.Bruce Bridgeman, A. H. C. Van der Heijden & Boris M. Velichkovsky - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):282.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    On Widening the Explanatory Gap.A. H. C. van der Heijden, P. T. W. Hudson & A. G. Kurvink - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):157-158.
    The explanatory gap refers to the lack of concepts for understanding “how it is that . . . a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue.” By assuming that there are colours in the outside world, Block needlessly widens this gap and Lycan and Kitcher simply fail to see the gap. When such assumptions are abandoned, an unnecessary and incomprehensible constraint disappears. It then becomes clear that the brain can use its own neural language for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Single-Letter Recognition Accuracy Benefits and Position Information.A. H. C. Van Der Heijden, G. Wolters, E. Fleur & J. G. M. Hommels - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (2):101-104.
  6.  4
    Successive Approximations to an Adequate Model of Attention.A. H. C. van der Heijden & S. Bem - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):413-428.
    Everybody knows the phenomena summarized with the term attention: concentration, focalization, limitation, selection, and intensification . The explanation of these phenomena is, however, a different matter. Problems easily arise with regard towhathas to be explained and with regard to thestyleof explanation. A problem of the first kind is the “methodology of ‘bad focus’”: the explanation starts with and is fixated on an intuitively striking but nonessential behavioral feature or cognitive achievement. A problem of the second kind is a “virtus dormitiva” (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  3
    Marr Versus Marr: On the Notion of Levels.Frank van der Velde, Gezinus Wolters & A. H. C. van der Heijden - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):681.
  8.  2
    Relationship of Saccadic Suppression to Space Constancy.Bruce Bridgeman, A. H. C. Van der Heijden & Boris M. Velichkovsky - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):553-554.
  9.  2
    Eye Movements and Attention.A. H. C. van der Heijden & S. Bem - 1997 - Consciousness and Cognition 6 (2-3):437-440.
  10. Space as Reference Signal? Elaborate It in Depth!Boris M. Velichkovsky & A. H. C. Van der Heijden - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):337.