13 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Adrian Carter (Monash University)
  1.  53
    Views of Addiction Neuroscientists and Clinicians on the Clinical Impact of a 'Brain Disease Model of Addiction'.Stephanie Bell, Adrian Carter, Rebecca Mathews, Coral Gartner, Jayne Lucke & Wayne Hall - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (1):19-27.
    Addiction is increasingly described as a “chronic and relapsing brain disease”. The potential impact of the brain disease model on the treatment of addiction or addicted individuals’ treatment behaviour remains uncertain. We conducted a qualitative study to examine: (i) the extent to which leading Australian addiction neuroscientists and clinicians accept the brain disease view of addiction; and (ii) their views on the likely impacts of this view on addicted individuals’ beliefs and behaviour. Thirty-one Australian addiction neuroscientists and clinicians (10 females (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  47
    Drug-Induced Impulse Control Disorders: A Prospectus for Neuroethical Analysis.Adrian Carter, Polly Ambermoon & Wayne D. Hall - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (2):91-102.
    There is growing evidence that dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) used to treat Parkinson’s Disease can cause compulsive behaviours and impulse control disorders (ICDs), such as pathological gambling, compulsive buying and hypersexuality. Like more familiar drug-based forms of addiction, these iatrogenic disorders can cause significant harm and distress for sufferers and their families. In some cases, people treated with DRT have lost their homes and businesses, or have been prosecuted for criminal sexual behaviours. In this article we first examine the evidence (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3.  16
    Public Understandings of Addiction: Where Do Neurobiological Explanations Fit?Carla Meurk, Adrian Carter, Wayne Hall & Jayne Lucke - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (1):51-62.
    Developments in the field of neuroscience, according to its proponents, offer the prospect of an enhanced understanding and treatment of addicted persons. Consequently, its advocates consider that improving public understanding of addiction neuroscience is a desirable aim. Those critical of neuroscientific approaches, however, charge that it is a totalising, reductive perspective–one that ignores other known causes in favour of neurobiological explanations. Sociologist Nikolas Rose has argued that neuroscience, and its associated technologies, are coming to dominate cultural models to the extent (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  40
    The Social Implications of Neurobiological Explanations of Resistible Compulsions.Adrian Carter & Wayne Hall - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):15 – 17.
    The authors comments on several articles on addiction. Research suggests that addicted individuals have substantial impairments in cognitive control of behavior. The authors maintain that a proper study of addiction must include a neurobiological model of addiction to draw the attention of bioethicists and addiction neurobiologists. They also state that more addiction neuroscientists like S. E. Hyman are needed as they understand the limits of their research. Accession Number: 24077921; Authors: Carter, Adrian 1; Email Address: adrian.carter@uq.edu.au Hall, Wayne 1; Affiliations: (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  6
    Debunking Alarmist Objections to the Pharmacological Prevention of Ptsd.Wayne Hall & Adrian Carter - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):23 – 25.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  10
    Disease or Developmental Disorder: Competing Perspectives on the Neuroscience of Addiction.Wayne Hall, Adrian Carter & Anthony Barnett - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):103-110.
    Lewis’ neurodevelopmental model provides a plausible alternative to the brain disease model of addiction that is a dominant perspective in the USA. We disagree with Lewis’ claim that the BDMA is unchallenged within the addiction field but we agree that it provides unduly pessimistic prospects of recovery. We question the strength of evidence for the BDMA provided by animal models and human neuroimaging studies. We endorse Lewis’ framing of addiction as a developmental process underpinned by reversible forms of neuroplasticity. His (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    Scare-Mongering and the Anticipatory Ethics of Experimental Technologies.Adrian Carter, Perry Bartlett & Wayne Hall - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):47-48.
  8.  52
    Control and Responsibility in Addicted Individuals: What Do Addiction Neuroscientists and Clinicians Think?Adrian Carter, Rebecca Mathews, Stephanie Bell, Jayne Lucke & Wayne Hall - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (2):205-214.
    Impaired control over drug use is a defining characteristic of addiction in the major diagnostic systems. However there is significant debate about the extent of this impairment. This qualitative study examines the extent to which leading Australian addiction neuroscientists and clinicians believe that addicted individuals have control over their drug use and are responsible for their behaviour. One hour semi-structured interviews were conducted during 2009 and 2010 with 31 Australian addiction neuroscientists and clinicians (10 females and 21 males; 16 with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  62
    Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation.Adrian Carter, Emily Bell, Eric Racine & Wayne Hall - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (2):129-142.
    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as a potential treatment of drug addiction on the basis of its effects on drug self-administration in animals and on addictive behaviours in some humans treated with DBS for other psychiatric or neurological conditions. DBS is seen as a more reversible intervention than ablative neurosurgery but it is nonetheless a treatment that carries significant risks. A review of preclinical and clinical evidence for the use of DBS to treat addiction suggests that more animal (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  6
    Persons and Personification.William Grey, Wayne Hall & Adrian Carter - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):57-58.
  11.  4
    Standing at the Precipice: A Cautionary Note About Incremental Goods.Benjamin Capps & Adrian Carter - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (3):46-48.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    Avoiding Selective Ethical Objections to Nudges.Adrian Carter & Wayne Hall - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):12-14.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 2, Page 12-14, February 2012.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  2
    Ethical, Social and Clinical Challenges in using Deep Brain Stimulation to Treat Addiction and Other Impulsive and Compulsive Disorders.Adrian Carter, Philip Mosley, Cynthia Forlini & Wayne Hall - 2015 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 19 (1).
    Name der Zeitschrift: Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik Jahrgang: 19 Heft: 1 Seiten: 163-188.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography