5 found
Order:
  1.  21
    The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards.Simone de Colle, Adrian Henriques & Saras Sarasvathy - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-15.
    The purpose of this paper is to provide a constructive criticism of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) standards. After pointing out a number of benefits and limitations in the effectiveness of CSR standards, both from a theoretical point of view and in the light of empirical evidence, we formulate and discuss a Paradox of CSR standards: despite being well-intended, CSR standards can favor the emergence of a thoughtless, blind and blinkered mindset which is counterproductive of their aim of enhancing the social (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  23
    Corporate Truth: The Limits to Transparency.Adrian Henriques - 2007 - Earthscan.
    Printbegrænsninger: Der kan printes 10 sider ad gangen og max. 40 sider pr. session.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3.  32
    Civil Society and Social Auditing.Adrian Henriques - 2001 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 10 (1):40–44.
    ‘Social auditing’ is everywhere. An increasing number of companies – and also public and voluntary sector organisations – are trying to assess their social performance systematically. Shell, BP and General Motors are among them. How are they doing it? What impact do NGOs and civil society organisations have on this process? Do they have a privileged place in social audits? This article looks at these questions, and sets out a framework for understanding social audits and civil society. Examples are drawn (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  4.  6
    Civil Society and Social Auditing.Adrian Henriques - 2001 - Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (1):40-44.
  5.  1
    Corporations: Amoral Machines or Moral Persons?Adrian Henriques - 2005 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 24 (3):91-99.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation