114 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Mental Imagery.Alan Richardson - 1969 - Routledge.
  2.  82
    Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism.Alan W. Richardson - 1997 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a major contribution to the history of analytic philosophy in general and of logical positivism in particular. It provides the first detailed and comprehensive study of Rudolf Carnap, one of the most influential figures in twentieth-century philosophy. The focus of the book is Carnap's first major work: Der logische Aufbau der Welt. It reveals tensions within the context of German epistemology and philosophy of science in the early twentieth century. Alan Richardson argues that Carnap's move to philosophy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  3. Reconsidering Logical Positivism.Michael Friedman & Alan W. Richardson - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (1):152-155.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   149 citations  
  4. Interpreting Carnap: Critical Essays.Alan W. Richardson & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.) - 2024 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    A comprehensive, systematic, and historical collection of essays on Rudolf Carnap's philosophy and legacy, written by leading international experts. This volume provides a redressing of Carnap's place in the history of analytic philosophy, through his approach to metaphysics, values, politics, epistemology and philosophy of science.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  39
    Logical Empiricism as Scientific Philosophy.Alan W. Richardson - 2024 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    This Element offers a new account of the philosophical significance of logical empiricism that relies on the past forty years of literature reassessing the project. It argues that while logical empiricism was committed to empiricism and did become tied to the trajectory of analytic philosophy, neither empiricism nor logical analysis per se was the deepest philosophical commitment of logical empiricism. That commitment was, rather, securing the scientific status of philosophy, bringing philosophy into a scientific conception of the world.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  60
    The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism.Alan Richardson & Thomas Uebel (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    If there is a movement or school that epitomizes analytic philosophy in the middle of the twentieth century, it is logical empiricism. Logical empiricists created a scientifically and technically informed philosophy of science, established mathematical logic as a topic in and tool for philosophy, and initiated the project of formal semantics. Accounts of analytic philosophy written in the middle of the twentieth century gave logical empiricism a central place in the project. The second wave of interpretative accounts was constructed to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  7. Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
    This highly multidisciplinary collection discusses an increasingly important topic among scholars in science and technology studies: objectivity in science. It features eleven essays on scientific objectivity from a variety of perspectives, including philosophy of science, history of science, and feminist philosophy. Topics addressed in the book include the nature and value of scientific objectivity, the history of objectivity, and objectivity in scientific journals and communities. Taken individually, the essays supply new methodological tools for theorizing what is valuable in the pursuit (...)
  8. Occasions for an Empirical History of Philosophy of Science: American Philosophers of Science at Work in the 1950s and 1960s.Alan Richardson - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (1):1-20.
    The text- and argument-focused histories of philosophy that we have are mainly interested in teasing out the details of the positions taken on philosophical issues by individual philosophers. But this is a long way from having a historical explanation of the larger-scale trajectory of philosophical development. An empirical history of philosophy, however, examines the institutionalized places and venues for philosophical work that provide a rich, shared structure for the promotion of particular sorts of work. Mid-twentieth-century philosophers of science such as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  44
    Carnap's Construction of the World.Alan W. Richardson - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):717-720.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  10. 'That Sort of Everyday Image of Logical Positivism': Thomas Kuhn and the Decline of Logical Empiricist Philosophy of Science.Alan Richardson - 2007 - In Alan Richardson & Thomas Uebel (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 346--370.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  11.  47
    Logical Empiricism in North America.Gary L. Hardcastle & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) - 2003 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
    "An essential overview of an important intellectual movement, Logical Empiricism in North America offers the first significant, sustained, and multidisciplinary attempt to understand the intellectual, cultural, and political dimensions of ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  12. Toward a History of Scientific Philosophy.Alan Richardson - 1997 - Perspectives on Science-Historical Philosophical and Social 5 (3):418--451.
    Throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, philosophers of various sorts, including Helmholtz, Avenarius, Husserl, Russell, Carnap, Neurath, and Heidegger, were united in promulgating a new, “scientific” philosophy. This article documents some of the varieties of scientific philosophy and argues that the history of scientific philosophy is crucial to the development of analytic philosophy and the division between analytic and continental philosophy. Scientific philosophy defined itself via criticisms of old-fashioned systematic metaphysics and, in the twentieth century, of Lebensphilosophie. It (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  13. Narrating the history of reason itself: Friedman, Kuhn, and a constitutive a priori for the twenty-first century.Alan W. Richardson - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (3):253-274.
    : This essay explores some themes in use of a relativized Kantian a priori in the work of Thomas Kuhn and Michael Friedman. It teases out some shared and some divergent beliefs and attitudes in these two philosophers by comparing their characteristic questions and problems to the questions and problems that seem most appropriately to attend to an adequate understanding of games and their histories. It argues for a way forward within a relativized Kantian framework that is suggested but not (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  14.  62
    Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge.Alan W. Richardson & Hans Reichenbach - 1938 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Notre Dame Press.
    Hans Reichenbach was a formidable figure in early-twentieth-century philosophy of science. Educated in Germany, he was influential in establishing the so-called Berlin Circle, a companion group to the Vienna Circle founded by his colleague Rudolph Carnap. The movement they founded—usually known as "logical positivism," although it is more precisely known as "scientific philosophy" or "logical empiricism"—was a form of epistemology that privileged scientific over metaphysical truths. Reichenbach, like other young philosophers of the exact sciences of his generation, was deeply impressed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  15.  53
    A Critical Context For Longino’s Critical Contextual Empiricism.Miriam Solomon & Alan Richardson - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):211-222.
  16.  61
    Two Dogmas about Logical Empiricism.Alan Richardson - 1997 - Philosophical Topics 25 (2):145-168.
  17.  55
    Scientific Philosophy as a Topic for History of Science.Alan Richardson - 2008 - Isis 99 (1):88-96.
    In lieu of a programmatic argument about the general relations of history of science and philosophy of science, this essay offers a particular topic in the history of philosophy of science that should be of interest to both historians and philosophers of science. It argues that questions typical of contemporary history of science could illuminate the recent history of philosophy of science and analytic philosophy. It also suggests that the history of scientific philosophy is a particularly fruitful arena for historians (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  18. Engineering philosophy of science: American pragmatism and logical empiricism in the 1930s.Alan W. Richardson - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S36-S47.
    This essay examines logical empiricism and American pragmatism, arguing that American philosophy's embrace of logical empiricism in the 1930s was not a turning away from Dewey's pragmatism. It places both movements within scientific philosophy and finds two key points on which they agreed: their revolutionary ambitions and their social engineering sensibility. The essay suggests that the disagreement over emotivism in ethics should be placed within the context of a larger issue on which the movements disagreed: demarcationism and imperialism.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  19.  52
    Engineering Philosophy of Science: American Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism in the 1930s.Alan W. Richardson - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S36-S47.
    This essay examines logical empiricism and American pragmatism, arguing that American philosophy's embrace of logical empiricism in the 1930s was not a turning away from Dewey's pragmatism. It places both movements within scientific philosophy and finds two key points on which they agreed: their revolutionary ambitions and their social engineering sensibility. The essay suggests that the disagreement over emotivism in ethics should be placed within the context of a larger issue on which the movements disagreed: demarcationism and imperialism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  20. Logical Empiricism, American Pragmatism, and the Fate of Scientific Philosophy in North America.Alan W. Richardson - forthcoming - Logical Empiricism in North America:1.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  21. Imagery: Definition and types.Alan Richardson - 1983 - In Anees A. Sheikh (ed.), Imagery: Current Theory, Research, and Application. Wiley. pp. 3--42.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  22. Logical idealism and Carnap's construction of the world.Alan W. Richardson - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):59 - 92.
  23.  1
    Origins of Logical Empiricism. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVI.Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.) - 1996 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
    This latest volume in the eminent Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science series examines the main features of the intellectual milieu from which logical empiricism sprang, providing the first critical exploration of this context by ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  24. The Many Unities of Science: Politics, Semantics, and Ontology.Alan W. Richardson - 2006 - In ¸ Itekellersetal:Sp. pp. 1--25.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  25. From Epistemology to the Logic of Science: Carnap’s Philosophy of Empirical Knowledge in the 1930s.Alan W. Richardson - 1996 - In Ronald N. Giere & Alan W. Richardson (eds.), Origins of Logical Empiricism. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVI. Univ of Minnesota Press. pp. 309--332.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  26. Taking the Measure of Carnap's Philosophical Engineering: Metalogic as Metrology.Alan Richardson - 2013 - In Erich H. Reck (ed.), The Historical turn in Analytic Philosophy. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 60--77.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  27.  60
    How Not to Russell Carnap's Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:3-14.
    On the standard interpretation Rudolf Carnap's Der logische Aufbau der Welt amounts to a highly derivative work-a rigorous thinking through of Russell's External World program. An examination of the aims and methods of logical analysis reveals significant differences between the epistemologies of Russell and Carnap, however. It is argued that Russell's reliance on acquaintance makes logical analysis subservient to empiricist epistemic concerns while Carnap is determined to carry out a broadly Kantian program of guaranteeing the objectivity of science through the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  28. Science as Will and Representation: Carnap, Reichenbach, and the Sociology of Science.Alan W. Richardson - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):162.
    This essay explores some of the issues raised as regards the relations of philosophy and sociology of science in the work of Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach. It argues that Hans Reichenbach's distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification should not be seen as erecting a principled normative/descriptive distinction that demarcates philosophy of science from sociology of science. The essay also raises certain issues about the role of volition, decision, and the limits of epistemological concern in the work of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  29. Ernst Cassirer and Michael Friedman : Kantian or Hegelian dynamics of reason?Alan Richardson - 2010 - In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  30.  26
    Carnap on Unity of Science.Bianca Crewe & Alan Richardson - 2024 - In Alan W. Richardson & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Interpreting Carnap: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    It is no secret that various versions of logical empiricism argued for the importance of unified science. Carnap was a proponent of unity of science views, although he expressed this in different idioms at different times. In the Aufbau (1928) he spoke of the unity of the object domain secured through definability in the constitutional system, in his physicalist period he argued that a physicalist language could serve as the universal language of science, and in his mature philosophical work he (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. ‘The Tenacious, Malleable, Indefatigible, and Yet, Eternally Modifiable Will’: Hans Reichenbach’s Knowing Subject.Alan W. Richardson - 2005 - Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 79:73 -- 87.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  32. Freedom in a Scientific Society: Reading the Context of Reichenbach's Contexts.Alan Richardson - 2006 - In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer. pp. 41--54.
    The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification, this distinction dear to the projects of logical empiricism, was, as is well known, introduced in precisely those terms by Hans Reichenbach in his Experience and Prediction (Reichenbach 1938). Thus, while the idea behind the distinction has a long history before Reichenbach, this text from 1938 plays a salient role in how the distinction became canonical in the work of philosophers of science in the mid twentieth century. The new contextualist history (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  33. Conceiving, Experiencing, and Conceiving Experiencing: Neo-Kantianism and the History of the Concept of Experience.Alan W. Richardson - 2003 - Topoi 22 (1):55-67.
    It is often claimed that epistemological thought divides around the issue of the place of experience in knowledge: While empiricists argue that experience is the only legitimate source of knowledge, rationalists find other such sources. The trouble with such accounts is not that they are wrong, but that they are incomplete. On occasion, epistemological differences run deeper, raising the very notion of experience as an issue for epistemology. This paper looks at two epistemological debates which concerned not simply the place (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  34. 'The Fact of Science' and the Critique of Knowledge: Exact Science as Problem and Resource in Marburg Neo-Kantianism.Alan Richardson - 2006 - In Michael Friedman & Alfred Nordmann (eds.), The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science. MIT Press. pp. 211-226.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  35.  63
    Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board.Burkard Eberlein & Alan Richardson - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):217-245.
    The increasing use of transnational standard-setting bodies to address quality uncertainties and coordination issues across the global economy raises questions about how these bodies establish and maintain their legitimacy and accountability outside the sovereignty of democratic states. Based on a discussion of the legitimacy challenge posed by global governance, we provide an overview of mechanisms by which such bodies can defend their legitimacy claims and examine the actual mechanisms used by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). While the IASB staked (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  36. The Limits of Tolerance: Carnap’s Logico-Philosophical Project in Logical Syntax.Alan W. Richardson - 1994 - Proceedings of Aristotelian Society:67--82.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37. But what then am I, this inexhaustible, unfathomable historical self? Or, upon what ground may one commit empiricism?Alan Richardson - 2011 - Synthese 178 (1):143 - 154.
    This essay examines the perspective from which Bas van Fraassen, in his book, The Empirical Stance, explains the project of empiricism. I argue that this perspective is a robustly transcendental perspective, which suggests that the tradition of empiricism lacks the resources to explain itself. I offer an alternative history of epistemic voluntarism in twentieth-century philosophy to the history van Fraassen himself provides, one that finds the novelty in van Fraassen's own views to be precisely his reintroduction of the knowing mind (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  38.  13
    I—Alan W. Richardson: ‘The Tenacious, Malleable, Indefatigable, and Yet, Eternally Modifiable Will’: Hans Reichenbach's Knowing Subject.Alan W. Richardson - 2005 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):73-87.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  39. A Theological Word Book of the Bible.Alan Richardson - 1951
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  40.  78
    Carnap's Principle of Tolerance.Alan Richardson & Dan Isaacson - 1994 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 68 (1):67 - 83.
    I see the perspective of Tolerance as enshrining an attitude toward philosophical work that stresses its continuity with the procedures of conceptual clarification through mathematisation found in the sciences. What I have tried to show is that Carnap's understanding of the philosophical foundations of mathematics is inseparable from his understanding of the business of philosophy of empirical science.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  41.  25
    Signal transduction through integrins: A central role for focal adhesion kinase?Alan Richardson & J. Thomas Parsons - 1995 - Bioessays 17 (3):229-236.
    The integrins are receptors for proteins of the extracellular matrix, both providing a physical link to the cytoskeleton and transducing signals from the extracellular matrix. Activation of integrins leads to tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of a number of proteins, elevation of cytosolic calcium levels, cytoplasmic alkalinization, changes in phospholipid metabolism and, ultimately, changes in gene expression. The recently discovered focal adhesion kinase localizes to focal contacts, which are sites of integrin clustering, and focal adhesion kinase can physically associate with integrins (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  42.  40
    The Geometry of Knowledge: Lewis, Becker, Carnap and the Formalization of Philosophy in the 1920s.Alan Richardson - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):165-182.
    On an ordinary view of the relation of philosophy of science to science, science serves only as a topic for philosophical reflection, reflection that proceeds by its own methods and according to its own standards. This ordinary view suggests a way of writing a global history of philosophy of science that finds substantially the same philosophical projects being pursued across widely divergent scientific eras. While not denying that this view is of some use regarding certain themes of and particular time (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  43. Tolerating Semantics: Carnap’s Philosophical Point of View.Alan W. Richardson - 2004 - In Carsten Klein & Steven Awodey (eds.), Carnap Brought Home - The View from Jena. Open Court. pp. 63--78.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  44.  34
    Due Process and Standard-setting: An Analysis of Due Process in Three Canadian Accounting and Auditing Standard-setting Bodies.Alan Richardson - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):679-696.
    Due process is the means by which ethical constraints are placed on administrative decision-making. I have developed a model of variation in due process and use this model to explore the implementation of “due process” norms by three standard-setting bodies that are created, funded, and overseen by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants – the Accounting Standards Board, the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, and the Public Sector Accounting Standards Board. I conducted two analyses: a comparative analysis of the implementation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  45.  35
    What Good is a (Indeed, This) History of Pragmatism?Alan Richardson - 2013 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (3):405.
    “Pragmatism” is a term to conjure with in recent history of philosophy—for a little over one hundred years various philosophers have used the term to advocate certain projects, to abjure others, to bind themselves with groups of like-minded philosophers, to distance themselves from other groups, to draw narrative arcs through recent history, to obscure other possible arcs, and so on. No one does quite so much with words as philosophers do. But what have they done with the word “pragmatism”?I have (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  46.  9
    Literature and the Cognitive Revolution.Alan Richardson & Francis F. Steen - 2002 - Duke University Press.
    Since the 1950s, the cognitive revolution has been transforming work in psychology, linguistics, and anthropology. Literary scholars, however, have only recently begun to grapple with the significance of cognitive understandings of language, mind, and behavior for literary and cultural studies. This unique issue of Poetics Today brings the concerns of literary history and cultural studies for the first time into a sustained and productive dialogue with cognitive methods, findings, and paradigms.The introduction situates the collection in relation to previous work, defines (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47.  34
    An Existentialist Theology: A Comparison of Heidegger and Bultmann.Alan Richardson - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (27):189.
  48.  27
    Eidetic imagery, occipital EEG activity, and palinopsia.Alan Richardson - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):613-613.
  49.  40
    Metaphysics and Idealism in the Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):45-72.
    The received view of the anti-metaphysics of Camap's Aufbau finds that it rests exclusively on verificationism. Alberto Coffa has recently put forward an interpretation of the antimetaphysical stance that claims that Camap was confusedly moving from ontological to semantical ideahsm. After raising objections to both of these views another interpretation is put forward. The crucial aspect of Camap's rejection of metaphysics rests on his reinterpretation of epistemology as the logic of objective knowledge. This leads to a rejection of metaphysics inasmuch (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50.  30
    Philosophy of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions: Remarks on the VPI Program for Testing Philosophies of Science.Alan W. Richardson - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:36 - 46.
    In this paper I argue that the program of L. Laudan et al for empirically testing historiographical philosophies of science ("the VPI program") does not succeed in providing a consistent naturalist program in philosophy of science. In particular, the VPI program endorses a nonnaturalist metamethodology that insists on a hypothetico-deductive structure to scientific testing. But hypothetico-deductivism seems to be both inadequate as an account of scientific theory testing in general and fundamentally at odds with most of the historiographic philosophies under (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
1 — 50 / 114