57 found
Order:
  1. De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross‐cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment.Florian Cova, Christopher Y. Olivola, Edouard Machery, Stephen Stich, David Rose, Mario Alai, Adriano Angelucci, Renatas Berniūnas, Emma E. Buchtel, Amita Chatterjee, Hyundeuk Cheon, In-Rae Cho, Daniel Cohnitz, Vilius Dranseika, Ángeles E. Lagos, Laleh Ghadakpour, Maurice Grinberg, Ivar Hannikainen, Takaaki Hashimoto, Amir Horowitz, Evgeniya Hristova, Yasmina Jraissati, Veselina Kadreva, Kaori Karasawa, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Kim, Minwoo Lee, Carlos Mauro, Masaharu Mizumoto, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Jorge Ornelas, Barbara Osimani, Carlos Romero, Alejandro Rosas, Massimo Sangoi, Andrea Sereni, Sarah Songhorian, Paulo Sousa, Noel Struchiner, Vera Tripodi, Naoki Usui, Alejandro V. del Mercado, Giorgio Volpe, Hrag A. Vosgerichian, Xueyi Zhang & Jing Zhu - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (3):317-338.
    Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat aesthetic judgments in the same way as typical expressions of subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, the property of being right or wrong regardless of disagreement. Moreover, this apparent intersubjective validity has been taken to constitute one of the main explananda for philosophical accounts of aesthetic judgment. But is it really the case that most people (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  2. Are There Cross-Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law.Ivar R. Hannikainen, Kevin P. Tobia, Guilherme da F. C. F. de Almeida, Raff Donelson, Vilius Dranseika, Markus Kneer, Niek Strohmaier, Piotr Bystranowski, Kristina Dolinina, Bartosz Janik, Sothie Keo, Eglė Lauraitytė, Alice Liefgreen, Maciej Próchnicki, Alejandro Rosas & Noel Struchiner - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (8):e13024.
    Despite pervasive variation in the content of laws, legal theorists and anthropologists have argued that laws share certain abstract features and even speculated that law may be a human universal. In the present report, we evaluate this thesis through an experiment administered in 11 different countries. Are there cross‐cultural principles of law? In a between‐subjects design, participants (N = 3,054) were asked whether there could be laws that violate certain procedural principles (e.g., laws applied retrospectively or unintelligible laws), and also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  37
    Extreme time-pressure reveals utilitarian intuitions in sacrificial dilemmas.Alejandro Rosas & David Aguilar-Pardo - 2020 - Thinking and Reasoning 26 (4):534-551.
    Studies with sacrificial moral dilemmas capture human variation in moral attitudes towards an extreme case of moral conflict between utilitarian and deontological principles. In this moral task, th...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  4. The Ship of Theseus Puzzle.David Rose, Edouard Machery, Stephen Stich, Mario Alai, Adriano Angelucci, Renatas Berniūnas, Emma E. Buchtel, Amita Chatterjee, Hyundeuk Cheon, In-Rae Cho, Daniel Cohnitz, Florian Cova, Vilius Dranseika, Angeles Eraña Lagos, Laleh Ghadakpour, Maurice Grinberg, Ivar Hannikainen, Takaaki Hashimoto, Amir Horowitz, Evgeniya Hristova, Yasmina Jraissati, Veselina Kadreva, Kaori Karasawa, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Kim, Min-Woo Lee, Carlos Mauro, Masaharu Mizumoto, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Christopher Y. Olivola, Jorge Ornelas, Barbara Osimani, Alejandro Rosas, Carlos Romero, Massimo Sangoi, Andrea Sereni, Sarah Songhorian, Paulo Sousa, Noel Struchiner, Vera Tripodi, Naoki Usui, Alejandro Vázquez Del Vázquez Del Mercado, Giorgio Volpe, Hrag A. Vosgerichian, Xueyi Zhang & Jing Zhu - 2014 - In Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 1. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 158-174.
    Does the Ship of Theseus present a genuine puzzle about persistence due to conflicting intuitions based on “continuity of form” and “continuity of matter” pulling in opposite directions? Philosophers are divided. Some claim that it presents a genuine puzzle but disagree over whether there is a solution. Others claim that there is no puzzle at all since the case has an obvious solution. To assess these proposals, we conducted a cross-cultural study involving nearly 3,000 people across twenty-two countries, speaking eighteen (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  5. Is a bad will a weak will? Cognitive dispositions modulate folk attributions of weakness of will.Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez & Jesús Antonio Gutiérrez Cabrera - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (3):350–363.
    In line with recent efforts to empirically study the folk concept of weakness of will, we examine two issues in this paper: (1) How is weakness of will attribution [WWA] influenced by an agent’s violations of best judgment and/or resolution, and by the moral valence of the agent’s action? (2) Do any of these influences depend on the cognitive dispositions of the judging individual? We implemented a factorial 2x2x2 between–subjects design with judgment violation, resolution violation, and action valence as independent (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. (1 other version)Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism.Ivar Hannikainen, Kevin Tobia, Guilherme de Almeida, Noel Struchiner, Markus Kneer, Piotr Bystranowski, Niek Strohmaier, Sammy Bensinger, Kristina Dolinina, Bartosz Janik, Egle Lauraityte, Michael Laakasuo, Alice Liefgreen, Ivars Neiders, Maciej Prochnicki, Alejandro Rosas, Jukka Sundvall & Tomasz Zuradzki - 2022 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44):e2206531119.
    A cross-cultural survey experiment revealed a widespread tendency to rely on a rule’s letter over its spirit when deciding which acts violate the rule. This tendency’s strength varied markedly across (k = 15) field sites, owing to cultural variation in the impact of moral appraisals on judgments of rule violation. Compared to laypeople, legal experts were more inclined to disregard their moral evaluations of the acts altogether, and consequently exhibited more pronounced textualist tendencies. Finally, we evaluated a plausible mechanism for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  52
    Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas.Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez & David Aguilar-Pardo - 2019 - Judgment and Decision Making 14:555-564.
    In the sacrificial moral dilemma task, participants have to morally judge an action that saves several lives at the cost of killing one person. According to the dual process corrective model of moral judgment suggested by Greene and collaborators (2001; 2004; 2008), cognitive control is necessary to override the intuitive, deontological force of the norm against killing and endorse the utilitarian perspective. However, a conflict model has been proposed more recently to account for part of the evidence in favor of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  72
    Beyond Inclusive Fitness? On A Simple And General Explanation For The Evolution of Altruism.Alejandro Rosas - 2010 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 2 (20130604).
    Altruism is a central concept in evolutionary biology. Evolutionary biologists still disagree about its meaning (E.O. Wilson 2005; Fletcher et al. 2006; D.S. Wilson 2008; Foster et al. 2006a, b; West et al. 2007a, 2008). Semantic disagreement appears to be quite robust and not easily overcome by attempts at clarification, suggesting that substantive conceptual issues lurk in the background. Briefly, group selection theorists define altruism as any trait that makes altruists losers to selfish traits within groups, and makes groups of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  9.  91
    Viewing Others as Equals: the Non-cognitive Roots of Shared Intentionality.Alejandro Rosas & Juan Pablo Bermúdez - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):485-502.
    We propose two adjustments to the classic view of shared intentionality as based on conceptual-level cognitive skills. The first one takes into account that infants and young children display this capacity, but lack conceptual-level cognitive skills. The second one seeks to integrate cognitive and non-cognitive skills into that capacity. This second adjustment is motivated by two facts. First, there is an enormous difference between human infants and our closest living primate relatives with respect to the range and scale of goal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10. Psychological and evolutionary evidence for altruism.Alejandro Rosas - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (1):93-107.
    Sober and Wilson have recently claimed that evolutionary theory can do what neither philosophy nor experimental psychology have been able to, namely, "break the deadlock" in the egoism vs. altruism debate with an argument based on the reliability of altruistic motivation. I analyze both their reliability argument and the experimental evidence of social psychology in favor of altruism in terms of the folk-psychological "laws" and inference patterns underlying them, and conclude that they both rely on the same patterns. I expose (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  11. The return of reciprocity: A psychological approach to the evolution of cooperation.Alejandro Rosas - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):555-566.
    Recent developments in evolutionary game theory argue the superiority of punishment over reciprocity as accounts of large-scale human cooperation. I introduce a distinction between a behavioral and a psychological perspective on reciprocity and punishment to question this view. I examine a narrow and a wide version of a psychological mechanism for reciprocity and conclude that a narrow version is clearly distinguishable from punishment, but inadequate for humans; whereas a wide version is applicable to humans but indistinguishable from punishment. The mechanism (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  12.  39
    Rationalization and Reflection Differentially Modulate Prior Attitudes Toward the Purity Domain.Ivar R. Hannikainen & Alejandro Rosas - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (6):e12747.
    Outside Western, predominantly secular‐liberal environments, norms restricting bodily and sexual conduct are widespread. Moralization in the so‐called purity domain has been treated as evidence that some putative violations are victimless. However, respondents themselves disagree: They often report that private yet indecent acts incur self‐harm, or harm to one's family and the wider community—a result which we replicate in Study 1. We then distinguish two cognitive processes that could generate a link between harmfulness and immorality, and recreate them in Studies 2 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  43
    Kant y la ciencia natural de los organismos.Alejandro Rosas - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):5-23.
    En la filosofía kantiana la explicación de los organismos, como ejemplos de diseño complejo, es un problema de difícil solución. Como entidades materiales deberían ser explicables por leyes mecánicas. Por su diseño, exigen una explicación por causas finales. Ambas explicaciones son inaceptables. Per..
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14. Beyond the Sociobiological Dilemma: Social Emotions and the Evolution of Morality.Alejandro Rosas - 2007 - Zygon 42 (3):685-700.
    Is morality biologically altruistic? Does it imply a disadvantage in the struggle for existence? A positive answer puts morality at odds with natural selection, unless natural selection operates at the level of groups. In this case, a trait that is good for groups though bad for individuals can evolve. Sociobiologists reject group selection and have adopted one of two horns of a dilemma. Either morality is based on an egoistic calculus, compatible with natural selection; or morality continues tied to psychological (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15. La moral y sus sombras: la racionalidad instrumental y la evolución de las normas de equidad.Alejandro Rosas - 2005 - Critica 37 (110):79-104.
    Los sociobiólogos han defendido una posición "calvinista" que se resume en la siguiente fórmula: si la selección natural explica las actitudes morales, no hay altruismo genuino en la moral; si la moral es altruista, entonces la selección natural no puede explicarla. En este ensayo desenmascaro los presupuestos erróneos de esta posición y defiendo que el altruismo como equidad no es incompatible con la selección natural. Rechazo una concepción hobbesiana de la moral, pero sugiero su empleo en la interpretación de la (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  24
    Harm, Reciprocity and the Moral Domain.Alejandro Rosas - 2013 - In Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer. pp. 493--502.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17. Perceiving utilitarian gradients: Heart rate variability and self-regulatory effort in the moral dilemma task.Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez, Jorge Martínez Cotrina, David Aguilar-Pardo, Juan Carlos Caicedo Mera & Diego Mauricio Aponte - 2021 - Social Neuroscience 16 (4):391–405.
    It is not yet clear which response behavior requires self-regulatory effort in the moral dilemma task. Previous research has proposed that utilitarian responses require cognitive control, but subsequent studies have found inconsistencies with the empirical predictions of that hypothesis. In this paper we treat participants’ sensitivity to utilitarian gradients as a measure of performance. We confronted participants (N = 82) with a set of five dilemmas evoking a gradient of mean utilitarian responses in a 4-point scale and collected data on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Argumentos trascendentales y la refutación kantiana del idealismo.Alejandro Rosas - 1990 - Ideas Y Valores 39 (82):33-50.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  12
    La Neuropsicología Del Juicio Moral. Sobre Las Causas de Respuestas Contraintuitivas a Los Dilemas Morales.Alejandro Rosas, Andrea Arciniegas, Esteban Cavides & Alejandra Arciniegas - 2014 - Praxis Filosófica 38:89-106.
    Una literatura creciente en neuropsicología estudia el juicio moral aplicando dilemas morales a personas con daños neuronales o con rasgos de personalidad antisocial; y parece confirmar una tendencia al juicio utilitarista contra-intuitivo, es decir, estas personas aprueban el sacrificio de un inocente para salvar varias vidas. Argumentamos que las evidencias encontradas no respaldan la hipótesis de dos módulos morales (Greene et al. 2004), sino más bien una disfunción en la capacidad empática o en el procesamiento de emociones, que apoyaría una (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  84
    Mind reading, deception and the evolution of Kantian moral agents.Alejandro Rosas - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (2):127–139.
    Classical evolutionary explanations of social behavior classify behaviors from their effects, not from their underlying mechanisms. Here lies a potential objection against the view that morality can be explained by such models, e.g. Trivers’reciprocal altruism. However, evolutionary theory reveals a growing interest in the evolution of psychological mechanisms and factors them in as selective forces. This opens up perspectives for evolutionary approaches to problems that have traditionally worried moral philosophers. Once the ability to mind-read is factored-in among the relevant variables (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  39
    Against the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality: Deconstructing a Philosophical Myth.Alejandro Rosas - 2021 - In Johan De Smedt & Helen De Cruz (eds.), Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics. Synthese Library. Springer - Synthese Library. pp. 135-150.
    Evolutionary ethics debunks moral realism – or value realism in general – but this is not the same as debunking the authority of moral claims, for moral realism is not the only possible explanation of the source of moral authority. However, a few influential evolutionary philosophers do believe that evolution debunks not just moral realism, but morality, period. My main purpose in this paper is to highlight the difference between these two versions of debunking, and to extricate evolutionary theory from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Las emociones morales como adaptaciones para la cooperación en dilemas sociales.Alejandro Rosas - 2007 - Ludus Vitalis 15 (28):97-118.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Multilevel selection and human altruism.Alejandro Rosas - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):205-215.
    Views on the evolution of altruism based upon multilevel selection on structured populations pay little attention to the difference between fortuitous and deliberate processes leading to assortative grouping. Altruism may evolve when assortative grouping is fortuitously produced by forces external to the organism. But when it is deliberately produced by the same proximate mechanism that controls altruistic responses, as in humans, exploitation of altruists by selfish individuals is unlikely and altruism evolves as an individually advantageous trait. Groups formed with altruists (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  32
    (1 other version)Diéguez Lucena, Antonio. La evolución del conocimiento. De la mente animal a la mente humana.Morales Juan Diego & Alejandro Rosas - 2012 - Ideas Y Valores 61 (150):289-298.
    Se busca rastrear la imagen que Platón tiene de Heráclito y articularla con la estructura argumentativa del Cratilo, para comprender las necesidades textuales a las que responde la doctrina del flujo perpetuo, es decir, la discusión sobre la corrección (ὀρθότης) del nombre. Gracias a la inclusión del testimonio heraclíteo, resulta posible rastrear la presunta consolidación de la tesis sobre los nombres primarios y los secundarios como el eje de la separación entre dos planos de realidad (uno estable y uno móvil) (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  56
    Jullien, François. El rodeo y el ac.Juan Diego Morales & Alejandro Rosas - 2012 - Ideas Y Valores 61 (150).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  22
    A cooperative species: human reciprocity and its evolution.Alejandro Rosas - 2013 - Revista de Filosofia Aurora 25 (36):343.
  27. Aprioridad y subjetividad: las dos caras de la" Crítica de la Razón Pura": defensa de una tesis de Strawson.Alejandro Rosas - 1992 - Ideas Y Valores 41 (87-88):41-58.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. ¿Decisión Utilitarista o Decisión Aleatoria?: Crítica a una tesis atrincherada en la neurociencia cognitiva.Alejandro Rosas, Esteban Caviedes, Maria Alejandra Arciniegas Gomez & Andrea Arciniegas Gomez - 2013 - Ideas Y Valores 62 (153):179-199.
    Diversos estudios han concluido que los pacientes con daño en la Corteza Frontal –CF– o Corteza Prefrontal Ventromedial –CPV– muestran una disposición a herir directamente a otra persona con el fin de salvar varias vidas en sus respuestas a los “dilemas morales personales”, revelando una posible carencia de empatía. No obstante, cuando evalúan conductas carentes de empatía sin justificación utilitarista, sus respuestas son normales. Defendemos aquí que los pacientes sufren una deficiencia cognitiva relacionada con la hipótesis de marcador somático de (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. El análisis del lenguaje moral en la teoría kantiana de la libertad.Alejandro Rosas - 1998 - Revista Venezolana de Filosofía 38:81-100.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  95
    El conflicto entre lo racional y lo irracional en los fundamentos de la filosofía de la historia según Kant.Alejandro Rosas - 1990 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 2 (2):261-279.
    La filosofía se ha preocupado desde susorígenes por el sentido de la vida humana. Estapreocupación es la que subyace a la "Filosofíade la Historia", disciplina que surge en laépoca moderna con la pregunta por la existencia o inexistencia de un progreso en la historia. Autores como Kant consideran que el progreso,para poder valer como tal, ha de aconteceren el terreno de lo moral, sobre todo en sus manifestaciones sociales externas, es decir, enla realización del derecho natural en las formasconcretas de (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  77
    El Efecto Knobe: Asimetrías en la atribuición de intencionalidad y sus causas.Alejandro Rosas & Maria Alejandra Arciniegas Gomez - 2013 - Manuscrito 36 (2):311-341.
  32. El grito de libertad del pensamiento.Alejandro Rosas - 1997 - Ideas Y Valores 46 (104):96-98.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Etica y ontología.Alejandro Rosas - 1992 - Universitas Philosophica 17:83-92.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Filosofía moral del naturalismo.Alejandro Rosas - 1998 - Ideas Y Valores 47 (106):122-135.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  51
    Fenómeno, nóumeno y mente en Kant.Alejandro Rosas - 1996 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 8 (1):65-80.
    El dualismo sustancial cartesiano y el problema mente-cuerpo suscitaron en la modernidad una reacción monista, que suprime la interacción ontológica dualistay concibe el problema como un conflicto entre discursos explicativos. Kant introduce la distinción entre fenómeno y nóumeno como una distinción de perspectivas, con la intención de resolver el conflicto entre explicaciones materialistas y explicaciones mentalistas.Sin embargo, no ubica consistentemente lo mentalen la perspectiva nouménica y oscurece así su solución perspectivista y sus compromisos ontológicos con el mentalismo idealista. El presente (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  68
    Kant and the Natural Science of Organisms.Alejandro Rosas - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):5–23.
    Regarding the explanation of organisms as instances of complex design, Kantian philosophy faces a difficult problem: as material entities they should be explained through mechanical laws, but because of their design, they call for an explanation through final causes. Nonetheless, both explanations are unacceptable. Does Kant offer any way out? Part of his solution is that both teleology and mechanicism must apply as regulative principles. But this implies limiting mechanicism to a regulative idea, which is inconsistent with his claim that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Kant, espíritus y noúmenos.Alejandro Rosas - 2001 - Ideas Y Valores:29-42.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  61
    La evolución de la moral contractual.Alejandro Rosas - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (147):209-222.
    Las explicaciones evolucionarias del altruismo y la cooperación humana, inauguradas por pioneros como Darwin, Hamilton y Trivers, sugieren que la biología podría eventualmente construir una explicación científica plausible de un núcleo de la moralidad humana. Según este proyecto, la moralidad y la ..
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. La Función De La Razón En El Naturalismo Moral De Hume.Alejandro Rosas - 1998 - Ideas Y Valores 47:75-86.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. (1 other version)La justificación biológica de la moral: modelos y perspectivas.Alejandro Rosas - 2002 - Ideas Y Valores 51 (118):17-34.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41. Levels of Selection in Synergy.Alejandro Rosas - 2009 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):135-150.
    Individual and group selection are usually conceived as opposed evolutionary processes. Though cases of synergy are occasionally recognized, the evolutionary importance of synergy is largely ignored. However, synergy is the plausible explanation for the evolution of collectives as higher level individuals i.e., collectives acting as adaptive units, e.g., genomes and colonies of social insects. It rests on the suppression of the predictable tendency of evolutionary units to benefit at the expense of other units or of the wholes they contribute to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. (1 other version)Natural Selection and Morality.Alejandro Rosas - 2006 - Ideas Y Valores 55:53-73.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Prometer en falso: la contradicción práctica y el imperativo categórico.Alejandro Rosas - 1997 - Ideas Y Valores 46:86-93.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  42
    Reseña de "La evolución y la verdad desnuda. Un enfoque darwinista de la filosofía" de Gonzalo Munévar.Alejandro Rosas - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):202-208.
  45.  1
    Sympathy and resentment.Alejandro Rosas - 2016 - Filosofia Unisinos 17 (2).
    I defend resentment as a legitimate and necessary moral attitude by neutralizing an objection that points to its hostile and morally repugnant character. The argument proceeds by embedding resentment in a view of morality as a social and communicative practice, supported by a common knowledge of apparently inborn moral expectations. In virtue of these natural expectations, every person is pre-institutionally entitled to goodwill and to the pleasure that arises from showing and receiving goodwill from others. Resentment arises naturally when these (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  76
    Towards a unified theory of reciprocity.Alejandro Rosas & Francesco Guala - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):36.
    In a unified theory of human reciprocity, the strong and weak forms are similar because neither is biologically altruistic and both require normative motivation to support cooperation. However, strong reciprocity is necessary to support cooperation in public goods games. It involves inflicting costs on defectors; and though the costs for punishers are recouped, recouping costs requires complex institutions that would not have emerged if weak reciprocity had been enough.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  34
    The Evolution of Contractual Morality.Alejandro Rosas - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (147):209–222.
    Evolutionary explanations of altruism and human cooperation, first set forth by pioneers such as Darwin, Hamilton and Trivers, suggest that biology might be capable of offering a plausible scientific explanation of the core of human morality. According to this project, morality and human cooperation arise when resourcesare scarce; they cannot be exploited by isolated individuals; and individuals cannot maintain a long-term position of domination over others in order to advance their selfish ends. An important philosophical question that arises with respect (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  10
    Transzendentaler Idealismus und Widerlegung der Skepsis bei Kant: Untersuchungen zur analytischen und metaphysischen Schicht in der "Kritik der reinen Vernuft".Alejandro Rosas - 1991
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49.  18
    Utilitarian Decision or Random Decision? Critique of a Thesis Rooted in Cognitive Neuroscience.Alejandro Rosas, Esteban Caviedes, Arciniegas Gomez Maria Alejandra & Arciniegas Gomez Maria Andrea - 2013 - Ideas Y Valores 62 (153):179-199.
    RESUMEN Diversos estudios han concluido que los pacientes con daño en la Corteza Frontal -CF- o Corteza Prefrontal Ventromedial -CPV- muestran una disposición a herir directamente a otra persona con el fin de salvar varias vidas en sus respuestas a los "dilemas morales personales", revelando una posible carencia de empatía. No obstante, cuando evalúan conductas carentes de empatía sin justificación utilitarista, sus respuestas son normales. Defendemos aquí que los pacientes sufren una deficiencia cognitiva relacionada con la hipótesis de marcador somático (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Universalización moral y prudencia en Kant.Alejandro Rosas - 1996 - Ideas Y Valores 45 (102):104-111.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 57