16 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Alex Steinberg [12]Alexander Steinberg [4]
See also
  1. Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Grounding, Supervenience, Response-Dependence (Basic Philosophical Concepts).Benjamin Schnieder, Miguel Hoeltje & Alex Steinberg (eds.) - 2013 - Philosophia Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  2. Priority Monism and Part/Whole Dependence.Alex Steinberg - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2025-2031.
    Priority monism is the view that the cosmos is the only independent concrete object. The paper argues that, pace its proponents, Priority monism is in conflict with the dependence of any whole on any of its parts: if the cosmos does not depend on its parts, neither does any smaller composite.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  3.  47
    Without Reason?Benjamin Schnieder & Alex Steinberg - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (4):523-541.
    The argument for modal collapse is partly responsible for the widespread rejection of the so-called Principle of Sufficient Reason in recent times. This paper discusses the PSR against the background of the recent debate about grounding and develops principled reasons for rejecting the argument from modal collapse.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4. Without Reason?Benjamin Schnieder & Alex Steinberg - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (3).
    The argument for modal collapse is partly responsible for the widespread rejection of the so-called Principle of Sufficient Reason in recent times. This paper discusses the PSR against the background of the recent debate about grounding and develops principled reasons for rejecting the argument from modal collapse.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  42
    Paradigmatic Metaphysics.Alex Steinberg - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):403-409.
    In a series of papers, Christian Nimtz argues for the view that the semantic notion of paradigm termhood lies at the heart of Kripkean philosophy of language and metaphysics. According to Nimtz, th...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Explanation by Induction?Miguel Hoeltje, Benjamin Schnieder & Alex Steinberg - 2013 - Synthese 190 (3):509-524.
    Philosophers of mathematics commonly distinguish between explanatory and non-explanatory proofs. An important subclass of mathematical proofs are proofs by induction. Are they explanatory? This paper addresses the question, based on general principles about explanation. First, a recent argument for a negative answer is discussed and rebutted. Second, a case is made for a qualified positive take on the issue.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  48
    Defining Global Supervenience.Alex Steinberg - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):367-380.
    What does it mean that certain properties globally supervene on others? The paper criticises the now standard way of spelling out the notion in terms of 1–1 correlations between world-domains and proposes a modification that escapes the difficulties. The new definition can secure the additional benefit of resisting an argument to the effect that global supervenience is theoretically dispensable.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  94
    Pleonastic Possible Worlds.Alexander Steinberg - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):767-789.
    The role of possible worlds in philosophy is hard to overestimate. Nevertheless, their nature and existence is very controversial. This is particularly serious, since their standard applications depend on there being sufficiently many of them. The paper develops an account of possible worlds on which it is particularly easy to believe in their existence: an account of possible worlds as pleonastic entities. Pleonastic entities are entities whose existence can be validly inferred from statements that neither refer to nor quantify over (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  31
    How to Properly Lose Direction.Alex Steinberg - forthcoming - Synthese.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  25
    Supervenience: A Survey.Alex Steinberg - 2013 - In .
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11. What Might Be and What Might Have Been.Benjamin Schnieder, Moritz Schulz & Alexander Steinberg - 2010 - In S.-J. Conrad & S. Imhof (eds.), Strawson - Concept and Object. ontos.
    The article is an extended comment on Strawson’s neglected paper ‘Maybes and Might Have Beens’, in which he suggests that both statements about what may be the case and statements about what might have been the case can be understood epistemically. We argue that Strawson is right about the first sort of statements but wrong about the second. Finally, we discuss some of Strawson’s claims which are related to positions of Origin Essentialism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  14
    Pleonastic Possible Worlds.Alexander Steinberg - 2013 - .
    The role of possible worlds in philosophy is hard to overestimate. Nevertheless, their nature and existence is very controversial. This is particularly serious, since their standard applications depend on there being sufficiently many of them. The paper develops an account of possible worlds on which it is particularly easy to believe in their existence: an account of possible worlds as pleonastic entities. Pleonastic entities are entities whose existence can be validly inferred from statements that neither refer to nor quantify over (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  40
    Adequate Counterpart Translations.Alex Steinberg - 2018 - Mind 127 (506):547-563.
    An important motivation for believing in the modal realist’s ontology of other concrete possible worlds and their inhabitants is its theoretical utility, centrally the reduction of ordinary modal talk to counterpart theory as showcased by David Lewis’s 1968 translation scheme. In a recent paper Harold Noonan, following the lead of John Divers, argues that Lewis’s scheme is not strictly adequate by the modal realist’s own lights, and that nothing short of jettisoning de dicto contingency will help. In this paper, I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  20
    Pleonastic Propositions and the Face Value Theory.Alex Steinberg - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):1165-1180.
    Propositions are a useful tool in philosophical theorizing, even though they are not beyond reasonable nominalistic doubts. Stephen Schiffer’s pleonasticism about propositions is a paradigm example of a realistic account that tries to alleviate such doubts by grounding truths about propositions in ontologically innocent facts. Schiffer maintains two characteristic theses about propositions: first, that they are so-called pleonastic entities whose existence is subject to what he calls something-from-nothing transformations ; and, second, that they are the referents of ‘that’-clauses that function (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  36
    Reviews Revenge of the Liar – New Essays on the Paradoxes Edited by J.C. Beall Oxford University Press, 2007, X + 374 Pp., £60 Isbn 978-0-19-923391-. [REVIEW]Alex Steinberg - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (3):454-458.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  3
    A Note on Surplus Content.Alexander Steinberg - 2017 - Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (2):202-205.
    ABSTRACTIn the target article, Stephen Yablo appeals crucially to the notion of surplus content. But when he does so, it is by appeal to the notion of mathematical addition and subtraction. In this commentary, I argue that the analogy with mathematical subtraction is underdeveloped and potentially misleading.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark