5 found
Alexander Friedman [3]Alexander W. Friedman [2]
  1.  36
    Which Benefits of Research Participation Count as 'Direct'?Alexander Friedman, Emily Robbins & David Wendler - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (2):60-67.
    It is widely held that individuals who are unable to provide informed consent should be enrolled in clinical research only when the risks are low, or the research offers them the prospect of direct benefit. There is now a rich literature on when the risks of clinical research are low enough to enroll individuals who cannot consent. Much less attention has focused on which benefits of research participation count as ‘direct’, and the few existing accounts disagree over how this crucial (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  33
    Does the Elephant Belong in the Room?Alexander Friedman - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):51 – 52.
  3.  45
    Rationing and Social Value Judgments.Alexander W. Friedman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):28 - 29.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 7, Page 28-29, July 2011.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  27
    Complete Lives, Incomplete Theories.Alexander Friedman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):58 – 60.
  5. Minimizing Harm: Three Problems in Moral Theory.Alexander W. Friedman - 2002 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Distance and morality. I argue that in "Faminine Ethics: the Problem of Distance in Morality and Singer's Ethical Theory" Frances Kamm fails to produce a pair of cases in which a moral difference is present that is not attributable to factors other than distance. I also point out that Kamm's attempts at explaining why distance could possibly matter in morality fall far short. I conclude that there is no reason for us to believe that distance matters in morality and offer (...)
    Export citation