16 found
  1. The E-Z Reader Model of Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Comparisons to Other Models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
    The E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al. 1998; 1999) provides a theoretical framework for understanding how word identification, visual processing, attention, and oculomotor control jointly determine when and where the eyes move during reading. In this article, we first review what is known about eye movements during reading. Then we provide an updated version of the model (E-Z Reader 7) and describe how it accounts for basic findings about eye movement control in reading. We then review several alternative models of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   58 citations  
  2.  7
    Toward a Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading.Erik D. Reichle, Alexander Pollatsek, Donald L. Fisher & Keith Rayner - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (1):125-157.
  3.  17
    Orthography and Familiarity Effects in Word Processing.Thomas H. Carr, Michael I. Posner, Alexander Pollatsek & Charles R. Snyder - 1979 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108 (4):389-414.
  4.  8
    Integrating Pictorial Information Across Eye Movements.Alexander Pollatsek, Keith Rayner & William E. Collins - 1984 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (3):426-442.
  5.  9
    An Integrated Model of Word Processing and Eye-Movement Control During Chinese Reading.Xingshan Li & Alexander Pollatsek - 2020 - Psychological Review 127 (6):1139-1162.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. Encoding Multiple Words Simultaneously in Reading is Implausible.Erik D. Reichle, Simon P. Liversedge, Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (3):115-119.
    Several prominent models of reading posit that attention is distributed to support the parallel lexical processing of multiple words. We contend that the auxiliary assumptions underlying this attention-gradient hypothesis are not well founded. Here, we address three specific issues related to the ongoing debate about attention allocation during reading: (i) why the attention-gradient hypothesis is widely endorsed, (ii) why processing several words in parallel in reading is implausible and (iii) why attention must be allocated to only one word at a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  5
    Using E-Z Reader to Simulate Eye Movements in Nonreading Tasks: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Eye–Mind Link.Erik D. Reichle, Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (1):155-185.
  8.  34
    Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.
    The issues the commentators have raised and which we address, include: the debate over how attention is allocated during reading; our distinction between early and late stages of lexical processing; our assumptions about saccadic programming; the determinants of skipping and refixations; and the role that higher-level linguistic processing may play in influencing eye movements during reading. In addition, we provide a discussion of model development and principles for evaluating and comparing models. Although we acknowledge that E-Z Reader is incomplete, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  11
    Tracking the Mind During Reading Via Eye Movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek, Denis Drieghe, Timothy J. Slattery & Erik D. Reichle - 2007 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (3):520-529.
  10.  44
    Is Covert Attention Really Unnecessary?Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):695-696.
    We are largely in agreement with the Findlay & Walker model. However, they appear to dismiss the role of covert spatial attention in tasks in which people are free to move their eyes. We argue that an account of the facts about the perceptual span in reading requires a window of attention not centered around the fovea. Moreover, a computational model of reading that we (Reichle et al. 1998) developed gives a good account of eye movement control in reading and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  26
    Parafoveal Processing During Reading is Reduced Across a Morphological Boundary.Denis Drieghe, Alexander Pollatsek, Barbara J. Juhasz & Keith Rayner - 2010 - Cognition 116 (1):136-142.
    Direct download (11 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  10
    Extending the E‐Z Reader Model of Eye Movement Control to Chinese Readers.Keith Rayner, Xingshan Li & Alexander Pollatsek - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (6):1021-1033.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  14
    Only the Simplest Dual-Route Theories Are Unreasonable.Alexander Pollatsek - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):722-723.
  14.  13
    Effects of Segmentation and Expectancy on Matching Time for Words and Nonwords.Robert M. Schindler, Arnold D. Well & Alexander Pollatsek - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):107.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  15. Reading and Writing.Alexander Pollatsek & Brett Miller - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
    Export citation  
  16.  5
    Two Types of Induced Familiarity in the Matching of Letter Strings.Gary R. Kidd, Alexander Pollatsek & Arnold D. Well - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (3):179-182.