5 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Moral Status and the Architects of Principlism.Francis Beckwith & Allison Krile Thornton - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):504-520.
    In this article, we discuss Beauchamp and Childress’s treatment of the issue of moral status. In particular, we introduce the five different perspectives on moral status that Beauchamp and Childress consider in Principles of Biomedical Ethics and explain their alternative to those perspectives, raise some critical questions about their approach, and offer a different way to think about one of the five theories of moral status that is more in line with what we believe some of its leading advocates affirm.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  61
    Varieties of Animalism.Allison Krile Thornton - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (9):515-526.
    Animalism in its basic form is the view that we are animals. Whether it is a thesis about anything else – like what the conditions of our persistence through time are or whether we're wholly material things – depends on the facts about the persistence conditions and ontology of animals. Thus, I will argue, there are different varieties of animalism, differing with respect to which other theses are taken in conjunction with animalism in its basic form. The different varieties of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  3.  37
    Libertarian Free Will: Contemporary Debates, Ed. David Palmer. [REVIEW]Allison Krile Thornton - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (2):239-245.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  5
    Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, and Identity. [REVIEW]Allison Krile Thornton - 2017 - Review of Metaphysics 71 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  2
    Animals Now and Then.Allison Krile Thornton - 2018 - Dissertation, Baylor University
    One aim of this dissertation is to remove ambiguities that have impeded a clear discussion and adequate evaluation of animalism. To that end I develop a taxonomy of different varieties of animalism and argue that there are substantive differences between them. In earlier debates about animalism, the previously elided distinctions that my taxonomy makes clear create unnecessary confusion and disagreement. My taxonomy resolves some of that confusion and provides the parties to the debate with a conceptual framework for importantly distinct (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark