11 found
Order:
  1. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.Amartya K. Sen - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):317-344.
  2.  15
    Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What's Wrong With Welfare Economics.Amartya K. Sen - 1979 - Economic Journal 89 (355):537-558.
  3. Games, Justice and the General Will.W. G. Runciman & Amartya K. Sen - 1965 - Mind 74 (296):554-562.
  4.  69
    Rationality and Morality: A Reply. [REVIEW]Amartya K. Sen - 1977 - Erkenntnis 11 (1):225 - 232.
    The paper examines problems for rationality and morality arising out of prisoners' dilemma. Section I criticizes a k sen's attempt to elimate, By variations of preference patterns, The clash between individual rationality and individual or social optimality. Section ii rejects sen's account of morality as a moral ordering of preferences over outcomes, Because it fails to resolve the conflict raised by prisoners' dilemma between individual and social optimality and creates a new conflict between rationality and individual optimality. Section iii sketches (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  42
    The Nature and Classes of Prescriptive Judgements.Amartya K. Sen - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66):46-62.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  40
    Hume's Law and Hare's Rule.Amartya K. Sen - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (155):75 - 79.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  13
    Rights: Formulation and Consequences.Amartya K. Sen - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):152-170.
    The symposium included in this issue of ANALYSE & KRITIK has provided an excellent occasion to re-examine formal as well as motivational issues underlying the so-called liberal paradox. This rejoinder discusses the significance of the new results and analyses, their bearing on the formulation and implications of rights, and also corrects a misinterpretation. Reflections precipitated by the liberal paradox can influence the acceptability of different principles of social decisions, and also the interpretation of 'preference' and 'unanimity'. They also point to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    Desigualdades de bienestar y axiomática rawlsiana.Amartya K. Sen - 1996 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 5 (1).
    Este artículo trata de las comparaciones ordinales de desigualdad de bienestar y su uso en los juicios de bienestar social, especialmente en el contexto del "principio de diferencia" de Rawls. En la sección 1 se desarrolla el concepto de comparaciones de desigualdad ordinales y se presenta un teorema sobre las comparaciones de desigualdad de bienestar para problemas de distribución. La sección 2 se dedicaa la discusión de Harsanyi (1955) de que la preocupación por reducir las desigualdades de bienestar entre las (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  9
    Funciones de bienestar social no lineales: una réplica al profesor Harsanyi.Amartya K. Sen - 1996 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 5 (1).
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Comments on Chapters by Pujol and Hutchinson.Amartya K. Sen - 1995 - In Edith Kuiper & Jolande Sap (eds.), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge. pp. 37.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Spiele, Gerechtigkeit und der allgemeine Wille.Amartya K. Sen & W. G. Runciman - 2002 - In Karsten Fischer & Herfried Münkler (eds.), Gemeinwohl Und Gemeinsinn: Rhetoriken Und Perspektiven Sozial-Moralischer Orientierung. De Gruyter. pp. 127-136.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography