70 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Ana S. Iltis [48]Ana Smith Iltis [22]
  1.  9
    Expertise, Ethics Expertise, and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Achieving Terminological Clarity.Ana S. Iltis & Mark Sheehan - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):416-433.
    The language of ethics expertise has become particularly important in bioethics in light of efforts to establish the value of the clinical ethics consultation, to specify who is qualified to function as a clinical ethics consultant, and to characterize how one should evaluate whether or not a person is so qualified. Supporters and skeptics about the possibility of ethics expertise use the language of ethics expertise in ways that reflect competing views about what ethics expertise entails. We argue for clarity (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  2.  5
    Building Norms for Organ Donation in China: Pitfalls and Challenges.Ana S. Iltis - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (5):640-662.
    In most, if not all, jurisdictions with active organ transplantation programs, there is a persistent desire to increase donation rates because the demand for transplantable organs exceeds the supply. China, in particular, faces an extraordinary gap between the number of organs donated by deceased donors and the number of people seeking one or more transplants. China might look to Western countries with higher donation rates to determine how best to introduce Western practices into the Chinese system. In attempting to increase (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  35
    Organ Donation, Brain Death and the Family: Valid Informed Consent.Ana S. Iltis - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):369-382.
    I argue that valid informed consent is ethically required for organ donation from individuals declared dead using neurological criteria. Current policies in the U.S. do not require this and, not surprisingly, current practices inhibit the possibility of informed consent. Relevant information is withheld, opportunities to ensure understanding and appreciation are extremely limited, and the ability to make and communicate a free and voluntary decision is hindered by incomplete disclosure and other practices. Current practices should be revised to facilitate valid informed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  18
    The “Ethics” Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Ana S. Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (4):363-368.
    The nature, possibility, and implications of ethics expertise in general and of bioethics expertise in particular has been the focus of extensive debate for over thirty years. What is ethics expertise and what does it enable experts to do? Knowing what ethics expertise is can help answer another important question: What, if anything, makes a claim of expertise legitimate? In other words, how does someone earn the appellation “ethics expert?” There remains deep disagreement on whether ethics expertise is possible, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5.  12
    Risk-Taking: Individual and Family Interests.Ana S. Iltis - 2015 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):437-450.
    Decisions regarding clinical procedures or research participation typically require the informed consent of individuals. When individuals are unable to give consent, the informed permission of a legally authorized representative or surrogate is required. Although many proposed procedures are aimed primarily at benefiting the individual, some are not. I argue that, particularly when individuals are asked to assume risks primarily or exclusively for the benefit of others, family members ought to be engaged in the informed consent process. Examples of procedures in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  51
    Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry.Ana Smith Iltis - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):271-284.
    Bioethical decision-making depends on presuppositions about the function and goal of bioethics. The authors in this issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy share the assumption that bioethics is about resolving cases, not about moral theory, and that the best method of bioethical decision-making is that which produces useful answers. Because we have no universally agreed upon background moral theory which can serve as the basis for bioethical decision-making, they try to move bioethics away from theory. For them, a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  7.  96
    Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: Ethical Considerations. [REVIEW]Michele K. Langowski & Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (2):71-78.
    Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: Ethical Considerations Content Type Journal Article Pages 71-78 DOI 10.1007/s10730-011-9158-5 Authors Michele K. Langowski, Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Salus Center, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette, 5th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63104-1314, USA Ana S. Iltis, Department of Philosophy and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7332, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA Journal HEC Forum Online ISSN 1572-8498 Print ISSN 0956-2737 Journal Volume Volume 23 Journal Issue (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  8.  10
    Moral Epistemology and Bioethics: Is the New Natural Law the Solution to Otherwise Intractable Disputes?Ana S. Iltis - 2016 - Christian Bioethics 22 (2):169-185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  5
    Prenatal Screening and Prenatal Diagnosis: Contemporary Practices in Light of the Past.Ana S. Iltis - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (6):334-339.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  31
    Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research.Ana S. Iltis - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):6-11.
  11.  12
    Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB.Laura M. Beskow, Christine Grady, Ana S. Iltis, John Z. Sadler & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (6):1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  71
    Values Based Decision Making: Organizational Mission and Integrity. [REVIEW]Ana Smith Iltis - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (1):6-17.
  13. Human Subjects Research : Ethics and Compliance.Ana Smith Iltis - 2006 - In Research Ethics. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  22
    Bioethics and the Culture Wars.Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (1):9-24.
    The term ‘culture wars’ has been used to describe deep, apparently intractable, disagreements between groups for many years. In contemporary discourse, it refers to disputes regarding significant moral matters carried out in the public square and for which there appears to be no way to achieve consensus or compromise. One set of battle lines is drawn between those who hold traditional Christian commitments and those who do not. Christian bioethics is nested in a set of moral and metaphysical understandings that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  5
    Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research.Ana S. Iltis - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):6-11.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  19
    Unproven Stem Cell–Based Interventions and Achieving a Compromise Policy Among the Multiple Stakeholders.Kirstin R. W. Matthews & Ana S. Iltis - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundIn 2004, patient advocate groups were major players in helping pass and implement significant public policy and funding initiatives in stem cells and regenerative medicine. In the following years, advocates were also actively engaged in Washington DC, encouraging policy makers to broaden embryonic stem cell research funding, which was ultimately passed after President Barack Obama came into office. Many advocates did this because they were told stem cell research would lead to cures. After waiting more than 10 years, many of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  25
    Organizational Ethics and Institutional Integrity.Ana Smith Iltis - 2001 - HEC Forum 13 (4):317-328.
  18.  23
    Costs to Subjects for Research Participation and the Informed Consent Process: Regulatory and Ethical Considerations.Ana S. Iltis - 2004 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26 (6):9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  27
    Timing Invitations to Participate in Clinical Research: Preliminary Versus Informed Consent.Ana Smith Iltis - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):89 – 106.
    This article addresses the impact of the potential conflict between the roles of physicians who are both clinicians and researchers on the recruitment of persons into research trials. It has been proposedthat a physician breaches inter-role confidentiality when he or she uses information gathered in his or her clinical role to inform patients about trials for which they may be eligible and that clinician-researchers should adopt a model of preliminary consent to be approached about research prior to commencing a clinical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20.  16
    Placebo Controlled Trials: Restrictions, Not Prohibitions.Ana Smith Iltis - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):380-393.
    The last two decades have witnessed intense debate over the ethical legitimacy of placebo controlled trials. Most of the arguments for and against the use of PCTs turn on one of the following issues: the compatibility of the obligations of clinicians and researchers with PCTs, the scientific merit of PCTs, and the influence of patients' and subjects' perceptions, ability to consent, expectations, and rights on the permissibility of PCTs. I introduce each of these categories and assess the principal arguments in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  18
    Who Is A Patient and Why Does It Matter?Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):62-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  63
    Research Ethics.Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) - 2005 - Routledge.
    Medicine in the twenty-first century is increasingly reliant on research to guarantee the safety and efficacy of medical interventions. As a result, the need to understand the ethical issues that research generates is becoming essential. This volume introduces the principal areas of concern in research on human subjects, offering a framework for understanding research ethics, and the relationship between ethics and compliance. Research Ethics brings together leading scholars in bioethics and the topics covered include the unique concerns that arise in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  4
    Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research.Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):488-501.
    Much of the human research conducted in the United States or by U.S. researchers is regulated by the Common Rule. The Common Rule reflects the decision of 17 federal agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services, to require that investigators follow the same rules for conducting human research., though there is significant overlap with the Common Rule.) Many of the obligations delineated in the Common Rule can be traced back to the work of the National Commission for the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  59
    Patient Ethics and Responsibilities.Ana Smith Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):131 – 137.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  64
    Bioethics: The Intersection of Private and Public Decisions.Ana Smith Iltis - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):381 – 388.
  26.  60
    Introduction.Lisa M. Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):617 – 619.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature Selected Citations From the ETHXWeb Database on Bioethics Centers October 17, 2007.Susan Dodds, Colin Thomson, Robert M. Veatch, Arthur Caplan, Autumn Fiester, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Ana Smith Iltis, Fabrice Jotterand, Wenmay Rei & Jiunn-Rong Yeh - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (6):326-338.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  21
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Susan G. DuBois - 2012 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 2 (2):v-vi.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  2
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2017 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 7 (2):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  5
    Editors’ Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2017 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 7 (3):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  6
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2018 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 8 (1):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  6
    Editors’ Note.James M. Dubois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2018 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 8 (2):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  6
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2018 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 8 (3):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  9
    Editors’ Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2019 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 9 (1):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  5
    Editors’ Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2019 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 9 (2):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  3
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2020 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 10 (1):v-vii.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  3
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2020 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 10 (2):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  1
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Heidi A. Walsh - 2020 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 10 (3):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  5
    Editors' Note.James M. DuBois & Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (3):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  3
    Editors’ Note.James M. DuBois & Ana S. Iltis - 2011 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (2):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  20
    Nancy Berlinger, Ph. D., M. Div., is Deputy Director and Associate for Religious Studies at The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York. Michael A. DeVita, MD, is Associate Professor of Critical Care Medicine and Internal Medicine and Chair of the UPMC Ethics Committee, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. [REVIEW]Barbara J. Evans, Sven Ove Hansson, Steve Heilig, Ana Smith Iltis, Kenneth V. Iserson, Anita F. Khayat, Greg Loeben, Jerry Menikoff & Rebecca D. Pentz - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13:313-314.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  58
    A New Moral Agent: The Patient Advocate.Ana Smith Iltis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):699 – 701.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  45
    Bioethics Consultation in the Private Sector.Ana Smith Iltis - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (2):87-93.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  36
    Biomedical Research Ethics.Ana Smith Iltis - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):515 – 522.
  45.  1
    Cancer and Fertility.Ana S. Iltis - 2017 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 7 (2):107-111.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Conducting and Terminating Randomized Controlled Trials.Ana Smith Iltis - 2006 - In Research Ethics. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  14
    Christian Bioethics Loses Its Founding Editor.Ana S. Iltis & Mark J. Cherry - 2018 - Christian Bioethics 24 (3):213-215.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  24
    Currents in Contemporary Ethics Ethical and Practical Concerns in Developing Payment Policies for Research Involving Children and Adolescents.Ana S. Iltis, Hisako Matsuo & Shannon R. DeVader - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):413-418.
    An Institute of Medicine panel charged with reviewing the system for overseeing research involving children concluded in 2004 that Institutional Review Boards, institutions engaged in research, and study sponsors should “adopt explicit written policies on acceptable and unacceptable types and amounts of payments related to [children’s] research participation.” We previously reported data on practices and policies in the U.S. regarding payments to children who participate in research and their parents. Here, we report additional results from our study and identify some (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Engelhardt on the Common Morality in Bioethics.Ana S. Iltis - 2018 - Conatus 3 (2):49.
    Contemporary bioethics is, at least in part, the product of biomedical and sociopolitical changes in the middle to latter part of the 20th century. These changes prompted reflection on deep moral questions at a time when traditional sources of moral guidance no longer were widely respected and, in some cases, were being rejected. In light of this, scholars, policy makers, and clinicians sought to identify a common morality that could be used among persons with different moral commitments to resolve disputes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  2
    Fair Inclusion and the Pursuit of Robustly Generalizable Clinically Relevant Knowledge.Ana S. Iltis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):27-30.
    Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 27-30.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 70