22 found
Order:
See also
Andreas Follesdal
University of Oslo
  1.  10
    Tracking Justice Democratically.Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (3):324-339.
    Is international judicial human rights review anti-democratic and therefore illegitimate, and objectionably epistocratic to boot? Or is such review compatible with—and even a recommended component of—an epistemic account of democracy? This article defends the latter position, laying out the case for the legitimacy, possibly democratic legitimacy of such judicial review of democratically enacted legislation and policy-making. The article first offers a brief conceptual sketch of the kind of epistemic democracy and the kind of international human rights courts of concern—in particular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  44
    Real World Justice. Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions.Andreas Follesdal & Thomas Pogge (eds.) - 2005 - Springer.
    It helps ordinary citizens evaluate their options and their responsibility for global institutional factors, and it challenges social scientists to address the causes of poverty and hunger that act across borders.The present volume ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  50
    Survey Article: Subsidiarity.Andreas Follesdal - 1998 - Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2):190-218.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  4.  12
    Getting to Justice?Andreas Follesdal - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):231-242.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in the EU and Canada.Andreas Follesdal & Victor M. Muñiz Fraticelli - 2015 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 10 (2):89-106.
    Andreas Follesdal,Victor Muñiz Fraticelli | : A Principle of Subsidiarity regulates the allocation and/or use of authority within a political order where authority is dispersed between a centre and various sub-units. Section 1 sketches the role of such principle of subsidiarity in the EU, and some of its significance in Canada. Section 2 presents some conceptions of subsidiarity that indicate the range of alternatives. Section 3 considers some areas where such conceptions might add value to constitutional and political deliberations in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  34
    Subsidiarity, Democracy, and Human Rights in the Constitutional Treaty of Europe.Andreas Follesdal - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):61–80.
  7.  2
    Union Citizenship: Unpacking the Beast of Burden.Andreas Follesdal - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (3):313-343.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  12
    Subsidiarity, Democracy, and Human Rights in the Constitutional Treaty of Europe.Andreas Follesdal - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):61-80.
  9.  33
    The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights.Andreas Follesdal - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):595-607.
  10.  39
    Equality of Education and Citizenship: Challenges of European Integration.Andreas Follesdal - 2008 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (5):335-354.
  11.  9
    The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory.Andreas Follesdal - 2013 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (2):339-360.
    The Article addresses some of the disagreement concerning the legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. It lays out some aspects of a theory of legitimacy for the international human rights judiciary that seem relevant to addressing two challenges: First, it is difficult to justify the human rights judiciary by appeal to standard accounts of why states agree to subject themselves to treaties. What is the problem the international human rights judiciary is meant to help solve? Second, the human rights (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  49
    Constructing a European Civic Society – Vaccination for Trust in a Fair, Multi-Level Europe.Andreas Follesdal - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (4):303-324.
  13.  15
    Global Ethics and Respect for Culture.Andreas Follesdal - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:3-23.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  21
    Multiple Citizenship: Normative Ideals and Institutional Challenges.Eva Erman & Andreas Follesdal - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302.
    Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  11
    Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law.Andreas Follesdal - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (2):242-251.
    Machiavelli's 500-year-old treatise The Prince outlined the central features of the realist tradition in international relations. His premises led him to question the likelihood of efficacious and stable international law and international courts, a skepticism that has present-day proponents. Machiavelli's reluctance was due to a combination of features of human nature and a focus on anarchic features of the relations among states. This article challenges these assumptions and implications: Other interpretations of human nature are closer to Machiavelli's text, and current (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  6
    Global Ethics and Respect for Culture.Andreas Follesdal - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:3-23.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  14
    Why Deliberative Democracy?Andreas Follesdal - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (1):125-127.
  18.  9
    Can There Be a Just Zionism? Does Anyone Care? On Chaim Ganz, A Just Zionism.Andreas Follesdal - 2011 - Ethical Perspectives 18 (4):625-632.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  20
    Exit, Choice, and Loyalty: Religious Liberty Versus Gender Equality.Andreas Follesdal - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):407–420.
  20.  17
    Introduction: How to Bring Normative Requirements to Bear on Institutions Beyond the State.Andreas Follesdal - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):461-465.
  21.  5
    The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union.Andreas Follesdal - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4):441-468.
  22. The Significance of State Borders for International Distributive Justice.Andreas Follesdal - 1991 - Dissertation, Harvard University
    How should the global set of social institutions distribute income and wealth among members of different states? I present a Theory of Global Justice which supports the Bounded Significance of State Borders: The states system must satisfy the Determinate Human Needs of all, and the distribution within each state must satisfy Rawls' Difference Principle. However, justice does not require a Global Difference Principle: income and wealth need not be distributed so as to maximize the income and wealth of the globally (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark