12 found
  1. Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task.Petter Johansson, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikstrom & Andreas Olsson - 2005 - Science 310 (5745):116-119.
    A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed to notice conspicuous mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  2.  22
    A ten-Year Follow-Up of a Study of Memory for the Attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb Memories and Memories for Flashbulb Events. [REVIEW]William Hirst, Elizabeth A. Phelps, Robert Meksin, Chandan J. Vaidya, Marcia K. Johnson, Karen J. Mitchell, Randy L. Buckner, Andrew E. Budson, John D. E. Gabrieli, Cindy Lustig, Mara Mather, Kevin N. Ochsner, Daniel Schacter, Jon S. Simons, Keith B. Lyle, Alexandru F. Cuc & Andreas Olsson - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (3):604-623.
  3.  87
    The Role of Social Cognition in Emotion.Andreas Olsson & Kevin N. Ochsner - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2):65-71.
  4.  7
    Social Fear Learning: From Animal Models to Human Function.Jacek Debiec & Andreas Olsson - 2017 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21 (7):546-555.
  5. Semantic Processing Without Conscious Identification: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.Georg Stenberg, Magnus Lindgren, Mikael Johansson, Andreas Olsson & Ingmar Rosén - 2000 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (4):973-1004.
  6.  7
    Mechanisms of Social Avoidance Learning Can Explain the Emergence of Adaptive and Arbitrary Behavioral Traditions in Humans.Björn Lindström & Andreas Olsson - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (3):688-703.
  7.  6
    Immunization Against Social Fear Learning.Armita Golkar & Andreas Olsson - 2016 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (6):665-671.
  8.  7
    Demonstrator Skill Modulates Observational Aversive Learning.Ida Selbing, Björn Lindström & Andreas Olsson - 2014 - Cognition 133 (1):128-139.
  9.  4
    Outline of a Sensory-Motor Perspective on Intrinsically Moral Agents.Christian Balkenius, Lola Cañamero, Philip Pärnamets, Birger Johansson, Martin Butz & Andreas Olsson - 2016 - Adaptive Behavior 24 (5):306-319.
    We propose that moral behaviour of artificial agents could be intrinsically grounded in their own sensory-motor experiences. Such an ability depends critically on seven types of competencies. First, intrinsic morality should be grounded in the internal values of the robot arising from its physiology and embodiment. Second, the moral principles of robots should develop through their interactions with the environment and with other agents. Third, we claim that the dynamics of moral emotions closely follows that of other non-social emotions used (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  10.  22
    The Role of a “Common is Moral” Heuristic in the Stability and Change of Moral Norms.Björn Lindström, Simon Jangard, Ida Selbing & Andreas Olsson - 2018 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 (2):228-242.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  11.  6
    Aversive Learning and Trait Aggression Influence Retaliatory Behavior.Tanaz Molapour, Björn Lindström & Andreas Olsson - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
  12.  27
    Is Cultivating “Biological Blindness” a Viable Route to Understanding Behavioral Phenomena?Andreas Olsson & Ame Öhman - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):220-221.
    Mitchell et al. propose that associative learning in humans and other animals requires the formation of propositions by means of conscious and controlled reasoning. This approach neglects important aspects of current thinking in evolutionary biology and neuroscience that support the claim that learning, here exemplified by fear learning, neither needs to be conscious nor controlled.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation