20 found
Order:
  1.  20
    Risk and the Pregnant Body.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong, Lisa H. Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann & Margaret Olivia Little - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (6):34-42.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2.  3
    Reframing Conscientious Care: Providing Abortion Care When Law and Conscience Collide.Mara Buchbinder, Dragana Lassiter, Rebecca Mercier, Amy Bryant & Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (2):22-30.
    “It's almost like putting salt in a wound, for this person who's already made a very difficult decision,” suggested Meghan Patterson, a licensed obstetrician-gynecologist whom we interviewed in our qualitative study of the experiences of North Carolina abortion providers practicing under the state's Woman's Right to Know Act. The act requires that women receive counseling with state-mandated information at least twenty-four hours prior to obtaining an abortion. After the law was passed, Patterson worked with clinic administrators, in consultation with a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  19
    “Prefacing the Script” as an Ethical Response to State-Mandated Abortion Counseling.Mara Buchbinder, Dragana Lassiter, Rebecca Mercier, Amy Bryant & Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2016 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):48-55.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  11
    The Second Wave: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Research.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth Faden - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5-22.
    Though much progress has been made on inclusion of non-pregnant women in research, thoughtful discussion about including pregnant women has lagged behind. We outline resulting knowledge gaps and their costs and then highlight four reasons why ethically we are obliged to confront the challenges of including pregnant women in clinical research. These are: the need for effective treatment for women during pregnancy, fetal safety, harm from the reticence to prescribe potentially beneficial medication, and the broader issues of justice and access (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  28
    Finding Autonomy in Birth.Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann, Margaret Little, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth M. Armstrong & Lisa Harris - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):1-8.
    Over the last several years, as cesarean deliveries have grown increasingly common, there has been a great deal of public and professional interest in the phenomenon of women 'choosing' to deliver by cesarean section in the absence of any specific medical indication. The issue has sparked intense conversation, as it raises questions about the nature of autonomy in birth. Whereas mainstream bioethical discourse is used to associating autonomy with having a large array of choices, this conception of autonomy does not (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  17
    Reframing the Framework: Toward Fair Inclusion of Pregnant Women as Participants in Research.Ruth R. Faden, Margaret Olivia Little & Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):50-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  13
    A Critique of the 'Fetus as Patient'.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):42 – 44.
  8.  18
    The Ethics of Aggregation and Hormone Replacement Therapy.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Evan R. Myers & Ruth R. Faden - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (2):187-211.
    The use of aggregated quality of life estimatesin the formation of public policy and practiceguidelines raises concerns about the moralrelevance of variability in values inpreferences for health care. This variabilitymay reflect unique and deeply held beliefs thatmay be lost when averaged with the preferencesof other individuals. Feminist moral theorieswhich argue for attention to context andparticularity underline the importance ofascertaining the extent to which differences inpreferences for health states revealinformation which is morally relevant toclinicians and policymakers. To facilitatethese considerations, we present (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  22
    Samantha Burton and the Rights of Pregnant Women Twenty Years After In Re A.C.Howard Minkoff & Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (6):13-15.
    In 1987, a young woman named Angela Carder, pregnant and dying from cancer, was ordered by a court of law to undergo a cesarean delivery against her and her family’s wishes. She and her baby both died. Three years later, an appeals court took an extraordinary stand: it vacated the order that ended their lives and upheld pregnant women’s rights to informed consent and bodily integrity. The “unkindest cut of all,”1 it seemed, had been condemned by the courts.2 Yet shortly (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  19
    Maternal-Fetal Surgery: The Fallacy of Abstraction and the Problem of Equipoise. [REVIEW]Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Mary Briody Mahowald - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (2):151-165.
    When surgery is performed on pregnant women forthe sake of the fetus (MFS or maternal fetalsurgery), it is often discussed in terms of thefetus alone. This usage exemplifies whatphilosophers call the fallacy of abstraction: considering a concept as if it were separablefrom another concept whose meaning isessentially related to it. In light of theirpotential separability, research on pregnantwomen raises the possibility of conflictsbetween the interests of the woman and those ofthe fetus. Such research should meet therequirement of equipoise, i.e., a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  24
    Pregnancy and Clinical Research.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (6):3-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  37
    Shame, Gender, Birth.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (1):101-118.
    : In recent years, critics of modern obstetrics have cited technology as responsible for women's discontent regarding childbirth. In this essay, I investigate and pry apart the connection between the quality of childbirth experience and technology. After identifying three factors considered constitutive of a 'good birth,' I demonstrate how technology can either facilitate or hinder each, but how dominant strains of birthing practice that reinforce female shame (hospital-based obstetrics and midwifery) consistently undermine them all. It is not technology per se, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  2
    Shame, Gender, Birth.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (1):101-118.
    In recent years, critics of modern obstetrics have cited technology as responsible for women's discontent regarding childbirth. In this essay, I investigate and pry apart the connection between the quality of childbirth experience and technology. After identifying three factors considered constitutive of a 'good birth,' I demonstrate how technology can either facilitate or hinder each, but how dominant strains of birthing practice that reinforce female shame consistently undermine them all. It is not technology per se, but its sensitive application, which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  13
    Is the Patient Always Right?Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Peter Schwartz - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (2):13-14.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Ethics Journal of the American Medical Association February 2004, Volume 6, Number 2 Clinical Case.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2004 - Ethics 6 (2):1.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  3
    HIV and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Women and Healthcare Policy.Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Ruth R. Faden - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):41-43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Case Study: Is the Patient Always Right?Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Peter Schwartz - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Ethical Issues in Reproduction.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2012 - In D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (eds.), Guidance for Healthcare Ethics Committees. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Issues in Reproduction.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2012 - In D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (eds.), Guidance for Healthcare Ethics Committees. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. The Second Wave: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Research.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth Faden - 2008 - Ijfab: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5-22.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography