4 found
Order:
  1.  18
    Beauvoir, Irigaray, and the Possibility of Feminist Phenomenology.Anne van Leeuwen - 2012 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2):474-484.
  2.  84
    Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW]Anne van Leeuwen - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
    Animating Luce Irigaray’s oeuvre are two indissociable projects: the disruption of Western metaphysics and the thinking of sexual difference. The intersection of these two projects implies that any attempt to think through the meaning and significance of Irigaray’s notoriously fraught invocation of sexual difference must take seriously the way in which this invocation is itself always already inflected by her disruptive gesture. In this paper, I will attempt to elucidate one moment of this intersection by focusing on her critical engagement (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Differences: Re-Reading Beauvoir and Irigaray.Emily Anne Parker & Anne van Leeuwen (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
    The essays in this volume seek to resituate the work of Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray both historically and in light of the demands of contemporary feminist theory by examining unexplored aspects of their thought. Authors also highlight the commonalties in thought between the two philosophers, articulating points of dialogue in logic, ethics, and politics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love.Anne Van Leeuwen - 2013 - Hypatia 28 (3):452-468.
    Although sexual difference is widely regarded as the concept that lies at the center of Luce Irigaray's thought, its meaning and significance is highly contested. This dissensus, however, attests to more than merely the existence of a recalcitrant conceptual ambiguity. That is, Irigaray's discussion of sexual difference remains fraught not because she leaves this concept undefined but because the centrality of sexual difference in fact marks a complex and unstable nexus of phenomena that shift throughout her work. Consequently, if Irigaray (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark