4 found
Order:
  1. Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women’s Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination.Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta & Annemiek Richters - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):239-249.
    This article focuses on the transformation of the female reproductive body with the use of assisted reproduction technologies under neo-liberal economic globalisation, wherein the ideology of trade without borders is central, as well as under liberal feminist ideals, wherein the right to self-determination is central. Two aspects of the body in western medicine—the fragmented body and the commodified body, and the integral relation between these two—are highlighted. This is done in order to analyse the implications of local and global transactions (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  9
    Modernity–Postmodernity Controversies: Habermas and Foucault.Annemiek Richters - 1994 - In Barry Smart (ed.), Theory, Culture and Society. Routledge. pp. 1--302.
  3.  40
    When Ethics, Healthcare, and Human Rights Conflict: Mental Healthcare for Asylum Seekers.Annemiek Richters - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (3):304-318.
    Mental health professionals who care for asylum seekers in Western European countries increasingly encounter problems for which standard diagnostic and therapeutic protocols and institutional healthcare policies offer no ready answers. In the following case vignettes some of these problems can be identified.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4. The Judgment Comes with Healing in its Wings: A Call for Rational Detachment.Annemiek Richters & Eduard Bonsel - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2).
    The necessity to criticize Pellegrino and Thomasma's A philosophical basis of medical practice on all methodological levels of scientific practice is defended; a transcendental critique such as their approach is inconsistent with the possibility of science, a theoretical refutation of their work which is internally inconsistent due to its phenomenological/pragmatic stand, an empirical critique of their readings of historical and sociological findings, and a rejection of the possible application of their approach as its social effects sustain or enhance ideological notions (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark