4 found
Order:
See also
Anthony Coleman
Willamette University
  1.  77
    Must We Mean What We Say?Anthony Coleman - 2003 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11 (1):114-115.
    Must We Mean What We Say?, Stanley Cavell's first book, has been recently rereleased with a new preface by the author. The book is a collection of essays spanning a twelve-year period, ranging in topic from the ‘ordinary language’ procedures of Austin and Wittgenstein to interpretations of literary works by Beckett and Shakespeare. It was originally published in 1969, yet it contains much that is still relevant for contemporary philosophy. Indeed, it could be argued that there is as much to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  81
    G. E. Moore and Bad Faith.Anthony Coleman - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):347-365.
    Abstract: G. E. Moore claimed to know a variety of commonsense propositions. He is often accused of being dogmatic or of begging the question against philosophers who deny that he knows such things. In this paper, I argue that this accusation is mistaken. I argue that Moore is instead guilty of answering questions of the form ‘Do I know p?’ in bad faith.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  17
    Issue Introduction.Anthony Coleman & Ivan Welty - 2010 - Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  1
    Must We Mean What We Say? [REVIEW]Anthony Coleman - 2003 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11 (1):114-114.
    Must We Mean What We Say?, Stanley Cavell's first book, has been recently rereleased with a new preface by the author. The book is a collection of essays spanning a twelve-year period, ranging in topic from the ‘ordinary language’ procedures of Austin and Wittgenstein to interpretations of literary works by Beckett and Shakespeare. It was originally published in 1969, yet it contains much that is still relevant for contemporary philosophy. Indeed, it could be argued that there is as much to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark