5 found
Order:
See also
Anthony Taylor
Oxford University
  1.  37
    Introduction to the Symposium on Matthew Kramer’s Liberalism with Excellence.Anthony Taylor & Paul Billingham - 2018 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 63 (1):1-7.
    In this symposium introduction we outline the central arguments of Matthew Kramer's Liberalism with Excellence, and situate the articles in the symposium with respect to the book and the wider debate between perfectionists and anti-perfectionists.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  16
    Liberal Perfectionism, Moral Integrity, and Self-Respect.Paul Billingham & Anthony Taylor - 2018 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 63 (1):63-79.
    This paper presents a dilemma for Matthew Kramer’s view, as defended in his Liberalism with Excellence. A central aim of that book is to critique existing liberal perfectionist theories, which he labels “edificatory,” and to defend a different such theory, which he calls “aspirational.” Edificatory perfectionism holds that governments ought to promote citizens’ well-being directly by inducing them to live lives that are more wholesome, cultivated, or autonomous. Aspirational perfectionism, meanwhile, holds that governments ought to promote the conditions under which (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  9
    Is Sensory-Motor Partitioning a Good Hypothesis?Anthony Taylor - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (4):669-670.
  4.  5
    Influence of Work Distribution Upon Complex Learning by the Noncorrection and Modified-Correction Methods.Clyde E. Noble & Anthony Taylor - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):352.
  5. Public Justification and the Reactive Attitudes.Anthony Taylor - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (1):97-113.
    A distinctive position in contemporary political philosophy is occupied by those who defend the principle of public justification. This principle states that the moral or political rules that govern our common life must be in some sense justifiable to all reasonable citizens. In this article, I evaluate Gerald Gaus’s defence of this principle, which holds that it is presupposed by our moral reactive attitudes of resentment and indignation. He argues, echoing P.F. Strawson in ‘Freedom and Resentment’, that these attitudes are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations