Results for 'Arash Dahi Taleghani'

145 found
Order:
  1.  1
    Pore Structure Characteristics and its Effect on Adsorption Capacity of Niutitang Marine Shale in Sangzhi Block, Southern China.Xinghua Wang, Arash Dahi Taleghani & Wenlong Ding - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (4):T843-T856.
    Characteristics of shale pore structures may play an important role in natural gas accumulation and consequently estimating the original gas in place. To determine the pore structure characteristics of Niutitang marine shale in the Sangzhi block, we carried out [Formula: see text] adsorption-desorption, [Formula: see text] adsorption, and methane isothermal adsorption on shale samples to reveal the pore size distribution and its impact on the adsorption capacity. Results indicate that the Niutitang Shale is in stages of maturity and overmaturity with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  4
    An Integrated Modeling Approach for Natural Fractures and Posttreatment Fracturing Analysis: A Case Study.Ping Puyang, Arash Dahi Taleghani & Bhaba Sarker - 2016 - Interpretation: SEG 4 (4):T485-T496.
    Hydraulic fracturing has been the principal production enhancement technique in low-permeability reservoirs for the past few decades. Through core and outcrop studies, advanced logging tools, microseismic mapping and well testing analysis, the complexity of induced fracture network in the presence of natural fractures has been further elucidated. Although most natural fractures are cemented by precipitations due to diagenesis, they can be reactivated during fracturing treatments and serve as preferential paths for fracture growth and fluid flow. However, current technologies for posttreatment (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  21
    The Ethics of Carr and Wendt: Fairness and Peace.Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou - 2018 - Journal of International Political Theory 14 (3):314-330.
    The, classical realist writings of E.H. Carr and constructivist publications of Alexander Wendt are extraordinarily influential. While they have provoked a great number of reactions within the discipline of International Relations, the ethical dimensions of their works have rarely been studied at length. This article seeks to remedy this lack of examination by engaging in an in-depth scrutiny of the moral concerns of these two mainstream International Relations scholars. On investigation, it is revealed that Carr demonstrates a strong commitment to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  98
    Pattern of Neuronal Activity Associated with Conscious and Unconscious Processing of Visual Signals.Arash Sahraie, Lawrence Weiskrantz, J. L. Barbur, Alison Simmons & M. Brammer - 1997 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Usa 94:9406-9411.
  5. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.Arash Abizadeh - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
    The question of whether or not a closed border entry policy under the unilateral control of a democratic state is legitimate cannot be settled until we first know to whom the justification of a regime of control is owed. According to the state sovereignty view, the control of entry policy, including of movement, immigration, and naturalization, ought to be under the unilateral discretion of the state itself: justification for entry policy is owed solely to members. This position, however, is inconsistent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   143 citations  
  6.  9
    Innovation Systems Approach: A Philosophical Appraisal.Arash Moussavi & Ali Kermanshah - 2018 - Philosophy of Management 17 (1):59-77.
    The innovation systems approach has swiftly spread out worldwide in the last three decades and stood as an important framework for policy-making in the fields of science, technology, and innovation. At the same time, there have been serious and untreated concerns in the literature about the theoretical soundness of this approach. Our discussion in this paper is based on the belief that a detailed analysis on epistemological foundations of the approach could shed a judgmental light on the aforementioned concerns. To (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  22
    Collective Contexts in Conversation: Grounding by Proxy.Arash Eshghi & Patrick G. T. Healey - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (2):299-324.
    Anecdotal evidence suggests that participants in conversation can sometimes act as a coalition. This implies a level of conversational organization in which groups of individuals form a coherent unit. This paper investigates the implications of this phenomenon for psycholinguistic and semantic models of shared context in dialog. We present a corpus study of multiparty dialog which shows that, in certain circumstances, people with different levels of overt involvement in a conversation, that is, one responding and one not, can nonetheless access (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope of Distributive Justice.Arash Abizadeh - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (4):318–358.
    Many anticosmopolitan Rawlsians argue that since the primary subject of justice is society's basic structure, and since there is no global basic structure, the scope of justice is domestic. This paper challenges the anticosmopolitan basic structure argument by distinguishing three interpretations of what Rawls meant by the basic structure and its relation to justice, corresponding to the cooperation, pervasive impact, and coercion theories of distributive justice. On the cooperation theory, it is true that there is no global basic structure, but (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  9.  58
    Sovereign Jurisdiction, Territorial Rights, and Membership in Hobbes.Arash Abizadeh - 2016 - In A. Martinich & Kinch Hoekstra (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Although sovereign jurisdictional authority is not itself a kind of property right for Hobbes, it is the object of the sovereign’s (not the state’s) proprietary rights. Jurisdictional authority for Hobbes is foundationally over persons rather than territory, so that the sovereign’s territorial jurisdiction is parasitic on jurisdiction over persons. Territory nevertheless plays a significant role in determining subjects’ political obligations because the sovereign’s ability to protect subjects is necessary for such obligations, and control over space is necessary to protect subjects. (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10. Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller.Arash Abizadeh - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (1):121-130.
  11.  45
    Hobbes’s Conventionalist Theology, the Trinity, and God as an Artificial Person by Fiction.Arash Abizadeh - 2018 - Historical Journal 60 (4):915-941.
    By the time Hobbes wrote Leviathan, he was a theist, but not in the sense presumed by either side of the present-day debate concerning the sincerity of his professed theism. On the one hand, Hobbes’s expressed theology was neither merely deistic, nor confined to natural theology: the Hobbesian God is not merely a first mover, but a person who counsels, commands, and threatens. On the other hand, the Hobbesian God’s existence depends on being constructed artificially by human convention. The Hobbesian (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.Arash Abizadeh - 2012 - American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882.
    Cultural-nationalist and democratic theory both seek to legitimize political power via collective self-rule: their principle of legitimacy refers right back to the very persons over whom political power is exercised. But such self-referential theories are incapable of jointly solving the distinct problems of legitimacy and boundaries, which they necessarily combine, once it is assumed that the self-ruling collectivity must be a pre-political, in-principle bounded, ground of legitimacy. Cultural nationalism claims that political power is legitimate insofar as it expresses the nation’s (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  13.  19
    Awareness of Faces is Modulated by Their Emotional Meaning.Maarten Milders, Arash Sahraie, Sarah Logan & Niamh Donnellon - 2006 - Emotion 6 (1):10-17.
  14.  35
    What is Conversation? Distinguishing Dialogue Contexts.Arash Eshghi & Patrick Gt Healey - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. The Special-Obligations Challenge to More Open Borders.Arash Abizadeh - 2016 - In Sarah Fine & Lea Ypi (eds.), Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford University Press.
    According to the special-obligations challenge to the justice argument for more open borders, immigration restrictions to wealthier polities are justified because of special obligations owed to disadvantaged compatriots. I interrogate this challenge by considering three types of ground for special obligations amongst compatriots. First, the social relations that come with shared residence, such as participation in a territorially bounded, mutually beneficial scheme of cooperation; having fundamental interests especially vulnerable to the state’s exercise of power; being subject to coercion by the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  16. Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other: On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity.Arash Abizadeh - 2005 - American Political Science Review 99 (1):45-60.
    Two arguments apparently support the thesis that collective identity presupposes an Other: the recognition argument, according to which seeing myself as a self requires recognition by an other whom I also recognize as a self (Hegel); and the dialogic argument, according to which my sense of self can only develop dialogically (Taylor). But applying these arguments to collective identity involves a compositional fallacy. Two modern ideologies mask the particularist thesis’s falsehood. The ideology of indivisible state sovereignty makes sovereignty as such (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  17.  80
    Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation? Four Arguments.Arash Abizadeh - 2002 - American Political Science Review 96 (3):495-509.
    This paper subjects to critical analysis four common arguments in the sociopolitical theory literature supporting the cultural nationalist thesis that liberal democracy is viable only against the background of a single national public culture: the arguments that (1) social integration in a liberal democracy requires shared norms and beliefs (Schnapper); (2) the levels of trust that democratic politics requires can be attained only among conationals (Miller); (3) democratic deliberation requires communicational transparency, possible in turn only within a shared national public (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  18. The Representation of Hobbesian Sovereignty: Leviathan as Mythology.Arash Abizadeh - 2013 - In S. A. Lloyd (ed.), Hobbes Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Readers of Hobbes have often seen his Leviathan as a deeply paradoxical work. On one hand, recognizing that no sovereign could ever wield enough coercive power to maintain social order, the text recommends that the state enhance its power ideologically, by tightly controlling the apparatuses of public discourse and socialization. The state must cultivate an image of itself as a mortal god of nearly unlimited power, to overpower its subjects and instil enough fear to win obedience. On the other hand, (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  1
    Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics.Arash Abizadeh - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
    Reading Hobbes in light of both the history of ethics and the conceptual apparatus developed in recent work on normativity, this book challenges received interpretations of Hobbes and his historical significance. Arash Abizadeh uncovers the fundamental distinction underwriting Hobbes's ethics: between prudential reasons of the good, articulated via natural laws prescribing the means of self-preservation, and reasons of the right or justice, comprising contractual obligations for which we are accountable to others. He shows how Hobbes's distinction marks a watershed (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  32
    The Nursing Metaparadigm Concept of Human Being in Islamic Thought.Nasrollah Alimohammadi, Fariba Taleghani, Esa Mohammadi & Reza Akbarian - 2014 - Nursing Inquiry 21 (2):121-129.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory.Arash Abizadeh - 2011 - American Political Science Review 105 (02):298-315.
    Hobbesian war primarily arises not because material resources are scarce; or because humans ruthlessly seek survival before all else; or because we are naturally selfish, competitive, or aggressive brutes. Rather, it arises because we are fragile, fearful, impressionable, and psychologically prickly creatures susceptible to ideological manipulation, whose anger can become irrationally inflamed by even trivial slights to our glory. The primary source of war, according to Hobbes, is disagreement, because we read into it the most inflammatory signs of contempt. Both (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  22.  5
    You Don't Deserve to Be Published.Arash Hejazi - 2011 - Logos 22 (1):53-62.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. Is There a Genuine Tension Between Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism and Special Responsibilities?Arash Abizadeh & Pablo Gilabert - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):349 - 365.
    Samuel Scheffler has recently argued that some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable; that such relationships give rise to “underived” special responsibilities; that there is a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities; and that we must consequently strike a balance between the two. We argue that there is no such tension and propose an alternative approach to the relation between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities. First, while some relationships are non-instrumentally valuable, no relationship is unconditionally valuable. Second, whether such relationships (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  24. Historical Truth, National Myths and Liberal Democracy: On the Coherence of Liberal Nationalism.Arash Abizadeh - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (3):291–313.
    The claim that liberal democratic normative commitments are compatible with nationalism is challenged by the widely acknowledged fact that national identities invariably depend on historical myths: the nationalist defence of such publicly shared myths is in tension with liberal democratic theory’s commitment to norms of publicity, public justification, and freedom of expression. Recent liberal nationalist efforts to meet this challenge by justifying national myths on liberal democratic grounds fail to distinguish adequately between different senses of myth. Once this is done (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  25.  38
    Hobbes on Mind: Practical Deliberation, Reasoning, and Language.Arash Abizadeh - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):1-34.
    Readers of Hobbes usually take his account of practical deliberation to be a passive process that does not respond to agents’ judgements about what normative reasons they have. This is ostensibly because deliberation is purely conative and/or excludes reasoning, or because Hobbesian reasoning is itself a process in which reasoners merely experience a succession of mental states (e.g. according to purely associative mental structures). I argue to the contrary that for Hobbes deliberation (and hence the basis for voluntary action) is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  7
    Application of Artificial Societies in Analysis of Social Dynamic Phenomena and Complex Processes.Arash Rahman - forthcoming - Social Research: An International Quarterly.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  14
    Intentions and Statins Prescribing: Can the Theory of Planned Behaviour Explain Physician Behaviour in Following Guideline Recommendations?Arash Rashidian & Ian Russell - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):749-757.
  28.  28
    Wealth Adjustment Using a Synergy Between Communication, Cooperation, and One-Fifth of Wealth Variables in an Artificial Society.Arash Rahman, Saeed Setayeshi & Mojtaba Shamsaei Zafarghandi - 2009 - AI and Society 24 (2):151-164.
    Wealth distribution based on classic sugarscape model leads to a population increase and the Gini coefficient decrease when cooperation and communication parameters are taken into account. In another study, this model was developed by implying a receipt of one-fifth of the assets of the population and derived utilization for poor people. The results showed a relation between mortality decrease, population increase, and Gini coefficient decrease (equality increase). In a synergic process, the wealth adjustment based on sugarscape model underwent some experiments (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  17
    Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly.Arash Abizadeh - 2021 - Perspectives on Politics 19 (3):791-806.
    The two traditional justifications for bicameralism are that a second legislative chamber serves a legislative-review function (enhancing the quality of legislation) and a balancing function (checking concentrated power and protecting minorities). I furnish here a third justification for bicameralism, with one elected chamber and the second selected by lot, as an institutional compromise between contradictory imperatives facing representative democracy: elections are a mechanism of people’s political agency and of accountability, but run counter to political equality and impartiality, and are insufficient (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  19
    Evaluating Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed for the Management of Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancers and Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the AGREE Instrument.Shirin Irani, Arash Rashidian, Reza Yousefi-Nooraie & Akbar Soltani - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):729-736.
  31.  14
    Empowerment in Family Planning as Viewed by Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study.Shahnaz Kohan, Masoumeh Simbar & Fariba Taleghani - 2012 - Journal of Biosocial Science 44 (2):209-219.
  32.  13
    Glory and the Evolution of Hobbes’s Disagreement Theory of War: From Elements to Leviathan.Arash Abizadeh - 2020 - History of Political Thought 41 (2):265-298.
    The centrality of glory, contempt, and revengefulness to Leviathan’s account of war is highlighted by three contextual features: Hobbes’s displacement of the traditional conception of glory as intrinsically intersubjective and comparative; his incorporation of the Aristotelian view that revengefulness is provoked by expressions of mere contempt; and the evolution of his account between 1640 and 1651. An archeology of Leviathan’s famous chapter thirteen confirms that Hobbes’s thesis throughout his career was that disagreement is the universal cause of war because prickly, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  34
    Minimum Presentation Time for Masked Facial Expression Discrimination.Maarten Milders, Arash Sahraie & Sarah Logan - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (1):63-82.
  34. Publicity, Privacy, and Religious Toleration in Hobbes's Leviathan.Arash Abizadeh - 2013 - Modern Intellectual History 10 (2):261-291.
    What motivated an absolutist Erastian who rejected religious freedom, defended uniform public worship, and deemed the public expression of disagreement a catalyst for war to endorse a movement known to history as the champion of toleration, no coercion in religion, and separation of church and state? At least three factors motivated Hobbes’s 1651 endorsement of Independency: the Erastianism of Cromwellian Independency, the influence of the politique tradition, and, paradoxically, the contribution of early-modern practices of toleration to maintaining the public sphere’s (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35. A Critique of the “Common Ownership of the Earth” Thesis.Arash Abizadeh - 2013 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 8 (2):33-40.
    In On Global Justice, Mathias Risse claims that the earth’s original resources are collectively owned by all human beings in common, such that each individual has a moral right to use the original resources necessary for satisfying her basic needs. He also rejects the rival views that original resources are by nature owned by no one, owned by each human in equal shares, or owned and co-managed jointly by all humans. I argue that Risse’s arguments fail to establish a form (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36.  43
    Hobbes’s Agnostic Theology Before Leviathan.Arash Abizadeh - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (5):714-737.
    Prior to 1651, Hobbes was agnostic about the existence of God. Hobbes argued that God’s existence could neither be demonstrated nor proved, so that those who reason about God’s existence will systematically vacillate, sometimes thinking God exists, sometimes not, which for Hobbes is to say they will doubt God’s existence. Because this vacillation or doubt is inherent to the subject, reasoners like himself will judge that settling on one belief rather than another is epistemically unjustified. Hobbes’s agnosticism becomes apparent once (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37.  3
    On the Relation Between the General Affective Meaning and the Basic Sublexical, Lexical, and Inter-Lexical Features of Poetic Texts—A Case Study Using 57 Poems of H. M. Enzensberger.Susann Ullrich, Arash Aryani, Maria Kraxenberger, Arthur M. Jacobs & Markus Conrad - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38.  39
    Can Blindsight Be Superior to 'Sighted-Sight?'.Ceri T. Trevethan, Arash Sahraie & Larry Weiskrantz - 2007 - Cognition 103 (3):491-501.
  39.  20
    Teaching Evidence‐Based Practice: The Teachers Consider the Content.Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Arash Rashidian, Jennifer L. Keating & Eva Schonstein - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):569-575.
  40.  10
    Gender Barriers to Health Promotion in Middle-Aged Iranian Women.B. Enjezab, Z. Farajzadegan, F. Taleghani & A. Aflatoonian - 2014 - Journal of Biosocial Science 46 (6):818-829.
  41. What is New Information?Osten Dahí - 1976 - In Nils Erik Enkvist & Viljo Kohonen (eds.), Reports on Text Linguistics: Approaches to Word Order. [Åbo Akademi].
  42.  91
    The Passions of the Wise: Phronêsis, Rhetoric, and Aristotle’s Passionate Practical Deliberation.Arash Abizadeh - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (2):267 - 296.
    According to Aristotle, character (êthos) and emotion (pathos) are constitutive features of the process of phronetic practical deliberation: in order to render a determinate action-specific judgement, practical reasoning cannot be simply reduced to logical demonstration (apodeixis). This can be seen by uncovering an important structural parallel between the virtue of phronêsis and the art of rhetoric. This structural parallel helps to show how Aristotle's account of practical reason and deliberation, which constructively incorporates the emotions, illuminates key issues in contemporary democratic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  43.  50
    Opposition Instead of Recognition: The Social Significance of “Determinations of Reflection” in Hegel’s Science of Logic.Arash Abazari - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (3):253-277.
    Axel Honneth reconstructs Hegel’s social and political philosophy on the basis of the concept of recognition. For Honneth, recognition is a constitutive relation between individuals that is in principle symmetrical. By conceiving recognition through symmetry, Honneth effectively bans the inclusion of power within recognitive relation. He thus regards the relations of power as cases of non-recognition or misrecognition. In this paper, I develop an alternative theory of the constitutive relation between individuals for Hegel, one that is based on the asymmetrical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  90
    Wage Competition and the Special-Obligations Challenge to More Open Borders.Arash Abizadeh, Manish Pandey & Sohrab Abizadeh - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (3):255-269.
    According to the special-obligations challenge to the justice argument for more open borders, immigration restrictions to wealthier polities are justified because of special obligations owed to disadvantaged compatriots negatively impacted by the immigration of low-skilled foreign workers. We refute the special-obligations challenge by refuting its empirical premise and draw out the normative implications of the empirical evidence for border policies. We show that immigration to wealthier polities has negligible impact on domestic wages and that only previous cohorts of immigrants are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  12
    On Arash Abizadeh, 'Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics'. [REVIEW]Michael LeBuffe - 2018 - European Hobbes Society 2018:NA.
    I would like to begin by congratulating Arash Abizadeh. Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics is a splendid book. Even where I have disagreed with Abizadeh, the book has been a great help to me in framing central issues and in setting out pressing questions for different interpretations. I am sure that it will be a valuable resource for students of Hobbes for many years. -/- Here I will discuss Abizadeh’s views on the science of morality in Hobbes, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  13
    Promoting Development and Use of Systematic Reviews in a Developing Country.Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Arash Rashidian, Saharnaz Nedjat, Reza Majdzadeh, Soroush Mortaz-Hedjri, Arash Etemadi & Hojjat Salmasian - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1029-1034.
  47.  86
    In Defence of the Universalization Principle in Discourse Ethics.Arash Abizadeh - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (2):193–211.
  48.  5
    Gender Barriers to Health Promotion in Middle-Aged Iranian Women.B. Enjezab, Z. Farajzadegan, F. Taleghani & A. Aflatoonian - 2013 - Journal of Biosocial Science 46 (6):1-12.
  49. Banishing the Particular: Rousseau on Rhetoric, Patrie, and the Passions.Arash Abizadeh - 2001 - Political Theory 29 (4):556-582.
    Rousseau initially attempts to secure freedom by grounding political rule in persuasion, rather than coercion. When the spectre of rhetoric undermines this strategy, he is led to ground the volonté générale in the silent and introspective disclosure of the solitary citizen’s inner conscience, which through a sentimentalist transformation of Descartes’s category of bon sens, is recast as an eminently public sentiment. But when rhetorical eloquence turns out to be indispensable to politics, Rousseau turns to republican virtue and the trope of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  50.  65
    On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?Arash Abizadeh - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4):445-472.
    The susceptibility of Habermas' socio-political theory to the charge of motivational impotence can be traced to a problem in the way in which he conceives of discursive practical reason. By implicitly constructing the notion of discursive rationality in contrast to, and in abstraction from, the rhetorical and affective components of language use, Habermas' notion of discursive practical reason ends up reiterating the same binaries — between reason and passion, abstract and concrete, universal and particular — that provide the tacit parameters (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
1 — 50 / 145