13 found
Order:
See also
Aret Karademir
Middle East Technical University
  1.  61
    Butler and Heidegger: On the Relation Between Freedom and Marginalization.Aret Karademir - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (4):824-839.
    Though the names “Judith Butler” and “Martin Heidegger” rarely come together in Butler and Heidegger scholarship, the critical encounter between these philosophers might help us conceptualize the relationship between freedom and marginalization. In this paper, I will read Butler from the perspective of the Heidegger of Being and Time and claim that what Butler's philosophy suggests is the radical dependency of one's freedom on the cultural resuscitation of socially murdered racial, sexual, ethnic, religious, and sectarian/confessional minorities. More specifically, I will (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  5
    Nietzsche’s Politics: Dynamis or Stasis?Aret Karademir - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):39-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. David Lewis ’in Modal Realizminde Dünya-Ötesi Karşıolgusal Önermeler, İkinci-Dereceden Dünyalar ve Dünyalar-Arası Nedensellik Sorunları‘.Aret Karademir & Pakize Sandıkçıoğlu - 2009 - Felsefe Tartismalari 43:1-15.
    David Lewis is most famous in the analytical metaphysics literature for his analysis of the truth conditions of counterfactual conditionals in terms of possible worlds, and for his analysis of causation in terms of counterfactual conditionals. He uses a notion of comparative similarity of possible worlds in his analysis of counterfactual conditionals. However, since he attributes reality to possible worlds he has attracted many criticisms. The aim of our paper is to present some counterfactuals whose account cannot be given within (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  5
    Foucault ve Cinsellik Deneyi Kurgusu.Aret Karademir - 2015 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):86-100.
    Foucault's philosophy is often divided into three periods: the archeological period of the 1960's, the geneological period of the 1970's, and the ethical period of the 1980's. Considering the subjects Foucault worked on, the methods he employed, and the nature of his analyses in the 1960's, 1970's, and 1980's, it seems prima facie that there is a considerable difference between the different periods of Foucault's career. Nevertheless, Fooucault claims that he has been working on the same subject, that is, the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  32
    Heidegger and Discrimination: On the Relation Between Historicity and Marginalization.Aret Karademir - 2013 - Philosophical Forum 44 (3):205-231.
  6.  70
    Heidegger and Foucault: On the Relation Between the Anxiety–Engendering–Truth and Being-Towards-Freedom. [REVIEW]Aret Karademir - 2013 - Human Studies 36 (3):375-392.
    In his very last, now famous, interview, Michel Foucault states that his philosophical thought was shaped by his reading of Heidegger, even though he does not specify what aspects of Heidegger’s philosophy inspired him in the first place. However, his last interview is not the only place where Foucault refers to Heidegger as his intellectual guide. In his 1981/1982 lecture course, The Hermeneutics of the Subject, Foucault confesses that the way Heidegger conceptualized the relationship between subject and truth was a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  38
    Heidegger and Nazism: On the Relation Between German Conservatism, Heidegger, and the National Socialist Ideology.Aret Karademir - 2013 - Philosophical Forum 44 (2):99-123.
  8.  18
    Liberal Çokkültürcülük: Ulusalcı Liberalizm ve Azınlık-içindeki-Azınlıklar Sorunsalı.Aret Karademir - 2017 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):19-41.
    Özet: 20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde, çıkış noktasını mensubu olduğu kültüre, ulusa veya devlete karşı korunması için bireysel haklarla donatılmış ve içerisinde yetiştiği kültürü rasyonel yetileri ile değerlendirip terk edebilme gücüne sahip “birey” anlayışında bulan “bireyci” liberalizmin içerisinden, bireylerin “kültürel” varlıklar olduklarını, bireysel özgürlüğün “kültürlerin korunması” olmaksızın icra edilemeyeceğini, bunun için de “kültürel azınlık hakları”nın liberalizmin olmazsa olmazı olduğunu savunan “liberal çokkültürcülük” doğmuştur. Bu yazıda, liberal çokkültürcülüğün en önemli versiyonlarından biri olan “ulusalcı liberalizm” incelenecek ve onun kadınlardan, LGBTİ bireylerinden ve dini (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  4
    Minority Rights and Public Autonomy: A Nonculturalist Argument for Accommodating Ethno‐Cultural Diversity.Aret Karademir - 2021 - Philosophical Forum 52 (2):121-137.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  9
    Non-Chauvinist Multiculturalism: A Critical Encounter Between Butler and Kymlicka on the Way to the Emancipationist Model of Minority Rights.Aret Karademir - 2017 - Philosophical Forum 48 (4):423-448.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  18
    Nietzsche’s Politics.Aret Karademir - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):39-47.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Queering Multiculturalism: Liberal Theory, Ethnic Pluralism, and the Problem of Minorities-Within-Minorities.Aret Karademir - 2018 - Lexington Books.
    Queering Multiculturalism argues for group-specific rights for ethno-cultural minorities, but without ignoring the possibility that such rights may lead to ethnic chauvinism, balkanization, and the cultural marginalization of minorities-within-minorities, such as ethnic LGBT people.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  29
    Subject of Conscience: On the Relation Between Freedom and Discrimination in the Thought of Heidegger, Foucault, and Butler.Aret Karademir - unknown
    Martin Heidegger was not only one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century but also a supporter of and a contributor to one of the most discriminatory ideologies of the recent past. Thus, "the Heidegger's case" gives us philosophers an opportunity to work on discrimination from a philosophical perspective. My aim in this essay is to question the relationship between freedom and discrimination via Heidegger's philosophy. I will show that what bridges the gap between Heidegger's philosophy and a discriminatory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark