8 found
Order:
  1. Karel Vanhaesebrouck, Arthur Cools, Thomas Crombez & Johan Taels (2008). Tragédie Classique, Souveraineté Et Droit: Le Cas de Britannicus (1699) de Jean Racine. In Arthur Cools (ed.), The Locus of Tragedy. Brill
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  3
    Bart J. Koet, Martin Parmentier, Carlo Leget, J. Visser, K. W. Jager, Arie L. Molendijk, Arthur Cools, A. H. C. van Eijk, M. F. M. van den Berk, Paul Schotsmans & Walter Van Herck (1999). Boekbesprekingen. Bijdragen 60 (1):93-116.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    Arthur Cools (2012). Disastrous Responsibility. Levinas Studies 6:113-130.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. P. C. Beentjes, Martien Parmentier, Riemer Roukema, Martin Parmentier, Jos E. Vercruysse, W. Logister, G. Rouwhorst, R. G. W. Huysmans, Arthur Cools, Arie L. Molendijk, A. Prokopf & M. C. H. van Dijk-Groeneboer (1999). Boekbesprekingen. Bijdragen 60 (3):346-367.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Andris Breitling, Chris Bremmers & Arthur Cools (eds.) (2015). Debating Levinas’ Legacy. Brill.
    The contributions of this volume discuss the legacy of Emmanuel Levinas’ philosophy. Examining critically the limits of his thinking, they also bear witness to its influence, thus demonstrating the significance of his groundbreaking project of establishing ethics as first philosophy.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Arthur Cools (2005). Naar Een Fenomenologische Benadering van de dissensusTowards a Phenomenological Approach to the Dissensus. Bijdragen 66 (2):179-195.
    According to a philosophical tradition, it is trivial to speak about dissensus: the incompatibility of meaning and the dispute are charcteritics of the life of the philosopical reflection. In its most radical sense, though, the notion of dissensus is not only opposed to the possibility of reaching consensus, but concerns the possibility of discourse itself. As such, dissensus confronts philosophy with an impossibility that challenges its evidence. How to approach this impossibility? I argue that the problem of dissensus is not (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Arthur Cools (2005). Naar een fenomenologische benadering Van de dissensus: Over het geschil tussen Maurice Blanchot en Emmanuel Levinas. Bijdragen 66 (2):179-195.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  30
    Arthur Cools (ed.) (2008). The Locus of Tragedy. Brill.
    This book wants to open a contemporary philosophical perspective on the tragic. What is the locus of tragedy?
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography