10 found
Order:
  1.  26
    Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses as Relations.Aysel Dogan - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):243 - 259.
    In spite of several attempts to explicate the relationship between a scientific hypothesis and evidence, the issue still cries for a satisfactory solution. Logical approaches to confirmation, such as the hypothetico-deductive method and the positive instance account of confirmation, are problematic because of their neglect of the semantic dimension of hypothesis confirmation. Probabilistic accounts of confirmation are no better than logical approaches in this regard. An outstanding probabilistic account of confirmation, the Bayesian approach, for instance, is found to be defective (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  43
    On the Priority of the Right to the Good.Aysel Doğan - 2011 - Kant-Studien 102 (3):316-334.
    Rawls's view that the right is prior to the good has been criticized by various scholars from divergent points of view. Some contend that Rawls's teleological/deontological distinction based on the priority of the right is misleading while others claim that no plausible ethical theory can determine what is right prior to the good. There is no consensus on how to interpret the priority of right to the good; nor is there an agreement on the criteria of teleological/deontological distinction. In this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Aristotle on Conceptual Awareness of Sensory Experiences.Aysel Dogan - 2004 - Philosophical Inquiry 26 (4):27-44.
  4.  3
    Liberalization in International Trade.Aysel Dogan - 2010 - Filosofia Unisinos 11 (2):130-140.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  3
    Cosmopolitan Principles of Distributive Justice.Aysel Doğan - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    Cosmopolitans hold that our duties of distributive justice to others do not stop at borders. Darrel Moellendorf is among those who defend the view that principles of distributive justice are applicable beyond borders. He suggests as a principle of international justice the global difference principle, which allows inequalities in the distribution of wealth and resources only if they are to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged individuals. In this paper, I try to indicate that Moellendorf’s argument for the global (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses as Relations.Aysel Dogan - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):243-259.
    In spite of several attempts to explicate the relationship between a scientific hypothesis and evidence, the issue still cries for a satisfactory solution. Logical approaches to confirmation, such as the hypothetico-deductive method and the positive instance account of confirmation, are problematic because of their neglect of the semantic dimension of hypothesis confirmation. Probabilistic accounts of confirmation are no better than logical approaches in this regard. An outstanding probabilistic account of confirmation, the Bayesian approach, for instance, is found to be defective (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Kozmopolitanska Načela Distributivne Pravednosti.Aysel Doğan - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Justification and Reliability.Aysel Dogan - 2005 - Epistemologia 28 (2):269-282.
  9. The Law of Peoples and the Cosmopolitan Critique.Aysel Dogan - 2004 - Reason Papers 27:131-148.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. The World State and Distributive Justice.Aysel Dogan - 2012 - Philosophia 41 (2).
    Some contend that in the absence of a world state, it is nonsense to speak of the principles of distributive justice. Thomas Nagel is among those who claim that the principles of social justice can only be effectively applied after a world state is established. Nagel supports this claim on the basis of the social contract theory; namely, that a coercive collective authority is necessary to secure obedience to the principles of justice. In this essay, I argue that a world (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography