Results for 'B-Deduction'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  34
    A Nonconceptualist Reading of the B-Deduction.Roberto Horácio de Sá Pereira - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):425-442.
    In this paper, I propose a new nonconceptual reading of the B-Deduction. As Hanna correctly remarks :399–415, 2011: 405), the word “cognition” has in both editions of the first Critique a wide sense, meaning nonconceptual cognition, and a narrow meaning, in Kant’s own words “an objective perception”. To be sure, Kant assumes the first meaning to account for why the Deduction is unavoidable. And if we take this meaning as a premise of the B-Deduction, then there is a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the 'Second Step' of the B-Deduction.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Kant Studies Online:51-92.
  3.  13
    Malachi Hacohen Historicizing Deduction: Scientific Method, Critical Debate, and the Historian.Historicizing Deduction - 2004 - In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Springer. pp. 11--17.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  98
    Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
    This paper is about the nature of the relationship between (1) the doctrine of Non-Conceptualism about mental content, (2) Kant's Transcendental Idealism, and (3) the Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding, or Categories, in the B (1787) edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, i.e., the B Deduction. Correspondingly, the main thesis of the paper is this: (1) and (2) yield serious problems for (3), yet, in exploring these two serious problems for the B Deduction, we also (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  5. Empirical Consciousness Explained: Self-Affection, (Self-)Consciousness and Perception in the B Deduction.Corey W. Dyck - 2006 - Kantian Review 11:29-54.
    Few of Kant’s doctrines are as difficult to understand as that of self-affection. Its brief career in the published literature consists principally in its unheralded introduction in the Transcendental Aesthetic and unexpected re-appearance at a key moment in the Deduction chapter in the B edition of the first Critique. Kant’s commentators, confronted with the difficulty of this doctrine, have naturally resorted to various strategies of clarification, ranging from distinguishing between empirical and transcendental self-affection, divorcing self-affection from the claims of self-knowledge (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Is There a Gap in Kant’s B Deduction?Stefanie Grüne - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
    In "Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content", Robert Hanna argues for a very strong kind of non-conceptualism, and claims that this kind of non-conceptualism originally has been developed by Kant. But according to "Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects and the Gap in the B Deduction", Kant's non-conceptualism poses a serious problem for his argument for the objective validity of the categories, namely the problem that there is a gap in the B Deduction. This gap is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  76
    The Second Step of the B‐Deduction.Frederick Rauscher - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):396-419.
    This paper offers a new interpretation of Kant's puzzling claim that the B-Deduction in the Critique of Pure Reason should be considered as having two main steps. Previous commentators have tended to agree in general on the first step as arguing for the necessity of the categories for possible experience, but disagree on what the second step is and whether Kant even needs a second step. I argue that the two parts of the B-Deduction correspond to the two (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  86
    'Objective Validity' and 'Objective Reality' in Kant's B-Deduction of the Categories.Aaron Bunch - 2010 - Kantian Review 14 (2):67-92.
    Like Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, we now have both an A- and a substantially revised B-edition of Henry Allison's commentary to and defence of that work: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense . Unlike Kant's Critique, however, Allison's first edition is unlikely to persist as an occasional rival to the second, since reviewers rightly consider the second to have superseded the landmark scholarship of the first. Nevertheless, before Allison's first edition is entirely supplanted, I would like to save (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  64
    Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
    This paper defends the thesis of the analyticity of the principle of apperception, as developed in the first part of the B-Deduction, against recent criticisms by Paul Guyer and Patricia Kitchen The first part presents these criticisms, the most important of which being that the analyticity thesis is incompatible with both the avowed goal of which being that the Deduction of establishing the validity of the categories and Üie account of apperception in the A-Deduction. The second part argues that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  18
    The Two Steps of the B-Deduction.Markku Leppäkoski - 1998 - Kantian Review 2:107-116.
    Since the publication of Dieter Henrich's classic paper, ‘The proof structure of the transcendental deduction’, in The Review of Metaphysics 22 , the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of the understanding has been under focus in Kant studies in a very special way. The B-deduction seems to be a proof in two steps. Consequently, the focus has been on questions like, ‘What is the structure of the deduction?’, and ‘Why is the deduction carried out in two steps?’ No (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  1
    Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
    This paper defends the thesis of the analyticity of the principle of apperception, as developed in the first part of the B-Deduction, against recent criticisms by Paul Guyer and Patricia Kitchen The first part presents these criticisms, the most important of which being that the analyticity thesis is incompatible with both the avowed goal of which being that the Deduction of establishing the vahdity of the categories and Üie account of apperception in the A-Deduction. The second part argues that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Kant on Perception: Naive Realism, Non-Conceptualism, and the B-Deduction.Anil Gomes - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):1-19.
    According to non-conceptualist interpretations, Kant held that the application of concepts is not necessary for perceptual experience. Some have motivated non-conceptualism by noting the affinities between Kant's account of perception and contemporary relational theories of perception. In this paper I argue (i) that non-conceptualism cannot provide an account of the Transcendental Deduction and thus ought to be rejected; and (ii) that this has no bearing on the issue of whether Kant endorsed a relational account of perceptual experience.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  13.  69
    The Unity of Cognition and the Subjectivist Vs. "Transformative" Approaches to the B-Deduction. Comments on James Conant.Dennis Schulting - 2017 - Critique:00-00.
  14.  67
    Reflections on the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):1-15.
  15.  74
    The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism.Manfred Baum - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):89-107.
  16.  4
    Mario Caimi, Kant’s B Deduction, Trans. Maria Del Carmen Caimi. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014. Pp. 160 ISBN 9781443865371 £41.99. [REVIEW]Thomas Land - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (3):509-514.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  65
    The Failure of the B-Deduction.Paul Guyer - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):67-84.
  18.  31
    Skepticism and Kant's B Deduction.Edwin McCann - 1985 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):71-89.
  19.  7
    Concerning 'Syntheses of Understanding’ in the B Deduction.Bernard Freydberg - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:287-293.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  18
    Comments on Paul Guyer's “The Failure of the B-Deduction”.James Van Cleve - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):85-87.
  21.  6
    Reflections on the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):1-15.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  24
    Comments on Manfred Baum's “the B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism”.Richard E. Aquila - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):109-114.
  23.  9
    Subjective Apperception and Objective Knowledge: A Study on de Role of 18 in the Strategy of CPR's B Deduction.Pedro Costa Rego - 2011 - Manuscrito 34 (2):521-552.
  24.  12
    Comments on Paul Guyer's “the Failure of the B-Deduction”.James Cleve - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):85-87.
  25.  1
    The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism.Manfred Baum - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):89-107.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    The Failure of the B-Deduction.Paul Guyer - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):67-84.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Comments on Manfred Baum’s “The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism”.Richard E. Aquila - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):109-114.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Categories, Necessity, and the Proof-Structure of the B-Deduction.Renato Duarte Fonseca - 2008 - In Valerio Hrsg V. Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Spindel Conference 1986 the B-Deduction.Hoke Robinson - 1987 - Dept. Of Philosophy, Memphis State University.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Categories, Necessity, and the Proof-Structure of the B-Deduction.Margit Ruffing, Guido A. De Almeida, Ricardo R. Terra & Valerio Rohden - 2008 - In Margit Ruffing, Guido A. De Almeida, Ricardo R. Terra & Valerio Rohden (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kantslaw and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Walter de Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  12
    The Second Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):5-20.
    The Transcendental Deduction in the second edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is divided in two parts. Nevertheless, the role of the second half is not immediately clear. This article intends to examine the argument presented in the second half after clarifying its purpose. Based on this approach, we sustain an interpretation according to which Kant tries to establish the validity of categories for all intuition given through sensibility. This interpretation seeks to confirm a conceptual articulation among sensible intuitions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  14
    The First Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):93-112.
    After the publication of Strawson’s “The Bounds of Sense”, the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has been widely regarded as a proof of the objectivity of knowledge as a condition of unity of self-consciousness. Nevertheless, many interpreters accept that there are passages which cannot be easily integrated into such a strategy. In this article, through an analysis of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction, I try to point out the need to adopt a different interpretation according (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  28
    The Transcendental Deduction From a to B: Combination in the Threefold Synthesis and the Representation of a Whole.Hoke Robinson - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):45-61.
  34.  12
    Gentzen Gerhard. Recherches Sur la Déduction Logique. French Translation of 4422 by Ladrière Jean, with Added Footnotes by the Translator. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1955, XI + 170 Pp.Feys Robert. Préface. Therein, Pp. VII–XI.Feys Robert. Note A. Les Méthodes de Déduction Naturelle. Therein, Pp. 1–2.Feys Robert. Note B. Notation Explicite des Suppositions. Therein, Pp. 29–34.Feys Robert. Note C. Méthodes N de Jaśkowski, Bernays Et Johannson. Therein Pp. 35–39.Feys Robert. Note D. Variantes des Calculs LK Et LJ. Therein, Pp. 77–83.Ladrière Jean. Note E. Un Calcul “MK” Analogue au Calcul NK. Therein, Pp. 84–89.Feys Robert. Note F. Signification des Séquences Et des Schémas de Structure. Therein, Pp. 90–92.Ladriére Jean. Note G. Les Schémas de Coupure Et de Fusion de Séquences. Therein, Pp. 93–97.Ladriére Jean. Note H. Tableau de la Démonstration du Théorème Fondamental. Therein, Pp. 98–100.Ladriére Jean. Note I. Marche de la Démonstration du Théorème Fondamental. Therein, Pp. [REVIEW]John van Heijenoort - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (4):350-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  18
    Book Review: R. J. G. B. De Queiroz, A. G. De Oliveira, D. M. Gabbay, The Functional Interpretation of Logical Deduction. [REVIEW]Adrian Rezuş - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (2):447-451.
  36.  11
    Un Nouveau Calcul de Déduction Naturelle Dû À F. B. Fitch.Jean-Blaise Grize - 1955 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 53 (39):328-367.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  12
    The Transcendental Deduction From A to B.Hoke Robinson - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):45-61.
  38.  5
    Solving the Triviality Problem in the B-Edition Transcendental Deduction.Tom Vinci - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 471-482.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Review: Frederic B. Fitch, Natural Deduction Rules for Obligation. [REVIEW]William H. Hanson - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):136-137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    Dopp J.. Logiques Construites Par Une Méthode de Déduction Naturelle. Collection de Logique Mathématique, Série B, No. 3, E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain, and Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1962, 191 Pp. [REVIEW]Dag Prawitz - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):502.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    Review: Haskell B. Curry, The Deduction Theorem in the Combinatory Theory of Restricted Generality. [REVIEW]Richard J. Orgass - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):468-469.
  42. Fitch Ḟrederic B.. Natural Deduction Rules for Obligation. American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 3 , Pp. 27–38.William H. Hanson - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):136-137.
  43. Curry Haskell B.. The Deduction Theorem in the Combinatory Theory of Restricted Generality. Logique Et Analyse, N.S. Vol. 3 , Pp. 15–39. [REVIEW]Richard J. Orgass - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):468-469.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
    James Van Cleve has argued that Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the categories shows, at most, that we must apply the categories to experience. And this falls short of Kant’s aim, which is to show that they must so apply. In this discussion I argue that once we have noted the differences between the first and second editions of the Deduction, this objection is less telling. But Van Cleve’s objection can help illuminate the structure of the B Deduction, and it suggests (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  45. Fichte's Deduction of the Moral Law.Owen Ware - forthcoming - In Steven Hoeltzel (ed.), Palgrave Fichte Handbook. Palgrave.
    It is often assumed that Fichte's aim in Part I of the System of Ethics is to provide a deduction of the moral law, the very thing that Kant – after years of unsuccessful attempts – deemed impossible. On this familiar reading, what Kant eventually viewed as an underivable 'fact' (Factum), the authority of the moral law, is what Fichte traces to its highest ground in what he calls the principle of the 'I'. However, scholars have largely overlooked a passage (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  57
    ‘An Almost Single Inference’ – Kant's Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered.Konstantin Pollok - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (3):323-345.
    By taking into account some texts published between the first and the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason that have been neglected by most of those who have dealt with the deduction of the categories, I argue that the core of the deduction is to be identified as the ‘almost single inference from the precisely determined definition of a judgment in general’, which Kant adumbrates in the Metaphysical Foundations in order to ‘make up for the deficiency’ of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  47.  22
    A Continuity Between the A and B Deductions of the Critique.Emilia Angelova - 2009 - Idealistic Studies 39 (1-3):53-69.
    Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics controversially claims that the A deduction is superior to the B deduction because the imagination, as the“common root” of understanding and sensibility, opens the first Critique to metaphysical ground. Drawing on Dieter Henrich, this paper reinterprets Heidegger’sreading by moving beyond the Analytic and taking the Dialectic into account. This suggests a continuity between the A and B deductions, namely that the imagination, as more than an ontic faculty, remains a basic power that keeps (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
    Kant wrote two versions of the Transcendental Deduction, the first, “A-”Deduction in 1781, and the second, “B-”Deduction in 1787. Since Henrich's “The Proof Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction”, most work on the Transcendental Deduction attempts to make sense of the B-Deduction's two-step argument structure. Though the A-Deduction has suffered comparative neglect, it has received some attention from interpreters who take its extended treatment of the “subjective” side of cognition to amount to a brand of proto-functionalism. Whatever the merits and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  82
    Self-Understanding in Kant's Transcendental Deduction.Derk Pereboom - 1995 - Synthese 103 (1):1 - 42.
    I argue that §§15–20 of the B-Deduction contain two independent arguments for the applicability of a priori concepts, the first an argument from above, the second an argument from below. The core of the first argument is §16's explanation of our consciousness of subject-identity across self-attributions, while the focus of the second is §18's account of universality and necessity in our experience. I conclude that the B-Deduction comprises powerful strategies for establishing its intended conclusion, and that some assistance (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  1
    Kant and the “Mystery Hidden” in the Critique of Pure Reason: A Methodological Approach to the A-Deduction Argument.Adriano Perin - 2018 - Manuscrito 41 (2):53-88.
    ABSTRACT At the core of Kant’s theoretical philosophy lies the deduction of the categories: his effort to secure the distinctiveness of sensibility and understanding and to provide a necessary relation between the domains of these faculties. The argument for this claim is presented in two different versions - i.e., the A and B editions of the Critique of pure reason - and is one of the most puzzling in Kant’s corpus. The common view in the literature that considers the importance (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000