Results for 'B-Deduction'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  28
    A Nonconceptualist Reading of the B-Deduction.Roberto Horácio de Sá Pereira - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):425-442.
    In this paper, I propose a new nonconceptual reading of the B-Deduction. As Hanna correctly remarks :399–415, 2011: 405), the word “cognition” has in both editions of the first Critique a wide sense, meaning nonconceptual cognition, and a narrow meaning, in Kant’s own words “an objective perception”. To be sure, Kant assumes the first meaning to account for why the Deduction is unavoidable. And if we take this meaning as a premise of the B-Deduction, then there is a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the 'Second Step' of the B-Deduction.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Kant Studies Online:51-92.
    This article is a modified version in translation of the original Dutch version that appeared in Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 4 (2010) / * This article has been updated and improved and appears now in the definitive version in my book Kant's Radical Subjectivism, chapter 5. Please refer to that chapter, rather than to this article.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  11
    Malachi Hacohen Historicizing Deduction: Scientific Method, Critical Debate, and the Historian.Historicizing Deduction - 2004 - In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Springer. pp. 11--17.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  86
    Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
    This paper is about the nature of the relationship between (1) the doctrine of Non-Conceptualism about mental content, (2) Kant's Transcendental Idealism, and (3) the Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding, or Categories, in the B (1787) edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, i.e., the B Deduction. Correspondingly, the main thesis of the paper is this: (1) and (2) yield serious problems for (3), yet, in exploring these two serious problems for the B Deduction, we also (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  5. Empirical Consciousness Explained: Self-Affection, (Self-)Consciousness and Perception in the B Deduction.Corey W. Dyck - 2006 - Kantian Review 11 (1):29-54.
    Few of Kant’s doctrines are as difficult to understand as that of self-affection. Its brief career in the published literature consists principally in its unheralded introduction in the Transcendental Aesthetic and unexpected re-appearance at a key moment in the Deduction chapter in the B edition of the first Critique. Kant’s commentators, confronted with the difficulty of this doctrine, have naturally resorted to various strategies of clarification, ranging from distinguishing between empirical and transcendental self-affection, divorcing self-affection from the claims of self-knowledge (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Is There a Gap in Kant's B Deduction?Stefanie Grüne - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
    In "Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content", Robert Hanna argues for a very strong kind of non-conceptualism, and claims that this kind of non-conceptualism originally has been developed by Kant. But according to "Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects and the Gap in the B Deduction", Kant's non-conceptualism poses a serious problem for his argument for the objective validity of the categories, namely the problem that there is a gap in the B Deduction. This gap is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  67
    The Second Step of the B‐Deduction.Frederick Rauscher - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):396-419.
    This paper offers a new interpretation of Kant's puzzling claim that the B-Deduction in the Critique of Pure Reason should be considered as having two main steps. Previous commentators have tended to agree in general on the first step as arguing for the necessity of the categories for possible experience, but disagree on what the second step is and whether Kant even needs a second step. I argue that the two parts of the B-Deduction correspond to the two (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  79
    'Objective Validity' and 'Objective Reality' in Kant's B-Deduction of the Categories.Aaron Bunch - 2010 - Kantian Review 14 (2):67-92.
    Like Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, we now have both an A- and a substantially revised B-edition of Henry Allison's commentary to and defence of that work: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense . Unlike Kant's Critique, however, Allison's first edition is unlikely to persist as an occasional rival to the second, since reviewers rightly consider the second to have superseded the landmark scholarship of the first. Nevertheless, before Allison's first edition is entirely supplanted, I would like to save (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  50
    Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
    This paper defends the thesis of the analyticity of the principle of apperception, as developed in the first part of the B-Deduction, against recent criticisms by Paul Guyer and Patricia Kitchen The first part presents these criticisms, the most important of which being that the analyticity thesis is incompatible with both the avowed goal of which being that the Deduction of establishing the validity of the categories and Üie account of apperception in the A-Deduction. The second part argues that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  16
    The Two Steps of the B-Deduction.Markku Leppäkoski - 1998 - Kantian Review 2 (1):107-116.
    Since the publication of Dieter Henrich's classic paper, ‘The proof structure of the transcendental deduction’, in The Review of Metaphysics 22 , the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of the understanding has been under focus in Kant studies in a very special way. The B-deduction seems to be a proof in two steps. Consequently, the focus has been on questions like, ‘What is the structure of the deduction?’, and ‘Why is the deduction carried out in two steps?’ No (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  1
    Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44:233-252.
    This paper defends the thesis of the analyticity of the principle of apperception, as developed in the first part of the B-Deduction, against recent criticisms by Paul Guyer and Patricia Kitchen The first part presents these criticisms, the most important of which being that the analyticity thesis is incompatible with both the avowed goal of which being that the Deduction of establishing the vahdity of the categories and Üie account of apperception in the A-Deduction. The second part argues that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  28
    The Unity of Cognition and the Subjectivist Vs. "Transformative Approaches to the B-Deduction. Comments on James Conant.Dennis Schulting - 2017 - Critique:00-00.
    In an illuminating new essay ‘Die Einheit des Erkenntnisvermögens bei Kant’ (Conant 2016/2017), James Conant critically addresses what he argues is a widespread assumption in modern philosophy, namely, the assumption that our rational capacity to know is a capacity that is somehow “added” or tacked on to the capacity that we humans share with other animals, that is, our receptive capacity for sensations, our sensibility. This is the so-called “additive” theory of cognition, more specifically of the relation between sensibility and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Kant on Perception: Naive Realism, Non-Conceptualism, and the B-Deduction.Anil Gomes - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):1-19.
    According to non-conceptualist interpretations, Kant held that the application of concepts is not necessary for perceptual experience. Some have motivated non-conceptualism by noting the affinities between Kant's account of perception and contemporary relational theories of perception. In this paper I argue (i) that non-conceptualism cannot provide an account of the Transcendental Deduction and thus ought to be rejected; and (ii) that this has no bearing on the issue of whether Kant endorsed a relational account of perceptual experience.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  14.  61
    Reflections on the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):1-15.
  15.  74
    The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism.Manfred Baum - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):89-107.
  16.  53
    The Failure of the B-Deduction.Paul Guyer - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):67-84.
  17.  7
    Concerning 'Syntheses of Understanding’ in the B Deduction.Bernard Freydberg - 1995 - Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 2:287-293.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  29
    Skepticism and Kant's B Deduction.Edwin McCann - 1985 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1):71-89.
  19.  18
    Comments on Paul Guyer's “The Failure of the B-Deduction”.James Van Cleve - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):85-87.
  20.  22
    Comments on Manfred Baum's “the B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism”.Richard E. Aquila - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):109-114.
  21.  3
    Reflections on the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):1-15.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  8
    Subjective Apperception and Objective Knowledge: A Study on de Role of 18 in the Strategy of CPR's B Deduction.Pedro Costa Rego - 2011 - Manuscrito 34 (2):521-552.
  23.  9
    Comments on Paul Guyer's “the Failure of the B-Deduction”.James Cleve - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):85-87.
  24.  1
    The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism.Manfred Baum - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):89-107.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    The Failure of the B-Deduction.Paul Guyer - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):67-84.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Comments on Manfred Baum’s “The B-Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism”.Richard E. Aquila - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):109-114.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Categories, Necessity, and the Proof-Structure of the B-Deduction.Renato Duarte Fonseca - 2008 - In Valerio Hrsg V. Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Spindel Conference 1986 the B-Deduction.Hoke Robinson - 1987 - Dept. Of Philosophy, Memphis State University.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Categories, Necessity, and the Proof-Structure of the B-Deduction.Margit Ruffing, Guido A. De Almeida, Ricardo R. Terra & Valerio Rohden - 2008 - In Margit Ruffing, Guido A. De Almeida, Ricardo R. Terra & Valerio Rohden (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kantslaw and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Walter de Gruyter.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  9
    The Second Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):5-20.
    The Transcendental Deduction in the second edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is divided in two parts. Nevertheless, the role of the second half is not immediately clear. This article intends to examine the argument presented in the second half after clarifying its purpose. Based on this approach, we sustain an interpretation according to which Kant tries to establish the validity of categories for all intuition given through sensibility. This interpretation seeks to confirm a conceptual articulation among sensible intuitions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  11
    The First Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):93-112.
    After the publication of Strawson’s “The Bounds of Sense”, the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has been widely regarded as a proof of the objectivity of knowledge as a condition of unity of self-consciousness. Nevertheless, many interpreters accept that there are passages which cannot be easily integrated into such a strategy. In this article, through an analysis of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction, I try to point out the need to adopt a different interpretation according (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  7
    Gentzen Gerhard. Recherches Sur la Déduction Logique. French Translation of 4422 by Ladrière Jean, with Added Footnotes by the Translator. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1955, XI + 170 Pp.Feys Robert. Préface. Therein, Pp. VII–XI.Feys Robert. Note A. Les Méthodes de Déduction Naturelle. Therein, Pp. 1–2.Feys Robert. Note B. Notation Explicite des Suppositions. Therein, Pp. 29–34.Feys Robert. Note C. Méthodes N de Jaśkowski, Bernays Et Johannson. Therein Pp. 35–39.Feys Robert. Note D. Variantes des Calculs LK Et LJ. Therein, Pp. 77–83.Ladrière Jean. Note E. Un Calcul “MK” Analogue au Calcul NK. Therein, Pp. 84–89.Feys Robert. Note F. Signification des Séquences Et des Schémas de Structure. Therein, Pp. 90–92.Ladriére Jean. Note G. Les Schémas de Coupure Et de Fusion de Séquences. Therein, Pp. 93–97.Ladriére Jean. Note H. Tableau de la Démonstration du Théorème Fondamental. Therein, Pp. 98–100.Ladriére Jean. Note I. Marche de la Démonstration du Théorème Fondamental. Therein, Pp. [REVIEW]John van Heijenoort - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (4):350-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  9
    Un Nouveau Calcul de Déduction Naturelle Dû À F. B. Fitch.Jean-Blaise Grize - 1955 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 53 (39):328-367.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  12
    Book Review: R. J. G. B. De Queiroz, A. G. De Oliveira, D. M. Gabbay, The Functional Interpretation of Logical Deduction. [REVIEW]Adrian Rezuş - 2015 - Studia Logica 103 (2):447-451.
  35.  27
    The Transcendental Deduction From a to B: Combination in the Threefold Synthesis and the Representation of a Whole.Hoke Robinson - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):45-61.
  36.  11
    The Transcendental Deduction From A to B.Hoke Robinson - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):45-61.
  37.  4
    Solving the Triviality Problem in the B-Edition Transcendental Deduction.Tom Vinci - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 471-482.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Review: Frederic B. Fitch, Natural Deduction Rules for Obligation. [REVIEW]William H. Hanson - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):136-137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Review: Haskell B. Curry, The Deduction Theorem in the Combinatory Theory of Restricted Generality. [REVIEW]Richard J. Orgass - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):468-469.
  40. Fitch Ḟrederic B.. Natural Deduction Rules for Obligation. American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 3 , Pp. 27–38.William H. Hanson - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):136-137.
  41. Curry Haskell B.. The Deduction Theorem in the Combinatory Theory of Restricted Generality. Logique Et Analyse, N.S. Vol. 3 , Pp. 15–39. [REVIEW]Richard J. Orgass - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):468-469.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Dopp J.. Logiques Construites Par Une Méthode de Déduction Naturelle. Collection de Logique Mathématique, Série B, No. 3, E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain, and Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1962, 191 Pp. [REVIEW]Dag Prawitz - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):502.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  78
    Kant's Deduction From Apperception.Dennis Schulting - 2017 - In Kant's Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction. London, UK: Palgrave. pp. 53-96.
    In this article, I consider critical arguments levelled against central elements of my view, expounded in my book Kant’s Deduction and Apperception (Schulting 2012b; KDA), that the categories are derived a priori from the principle of apperception, the ‘I think’. This view goes back to a much earlier, and more famous attempt by Klaus Reich, first proposed in 1932 (see Reich 2001), to argue that the functions of thought are ultimately and a priori derivable from the objective unity of apperception. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  8
    Problems of Kantian Nonconceptualism and the Transcendental Deduction.Dennis Schulting - 2017 - In Kant's Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction. London, UK: Palgrave. pp. 195-255.
    In this paper, I discuss the debate on Kant and nonconceptual content in the context of the main argument of the B-Deduction. Kantian conceptualists (Bowman 2011; Griffith 2012; Gomes 2014) have responded to the recent nonconceptualist offensive, with reference to A89ff./B122ff. (§13)—which, confusingly, the nonconceptualists also cite as evidence for their contrary reading—by arguing that the nonconceptualist view conflicts with the central goal of TD, namely, to argue that all intuitions are subject to the categories. I contend that the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
    James Van Cleve has argued that Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the categories shows, at most, that we must apply the categories to experience. And this falls short of Kant’s aim, which is to show that they must so apply. In this discussion I argue that once we have noted the differences between the first and second editions of the Deduction, this objection is less telling. But Van Cleve’s objection can help illuminate the structure of the B Deduction, and it suggests (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  46. Kant's Deduction From Apperception: A Reply to My Critics.Dennis Schulting - 2014 - Studi Kantiani 27:95-115.
    In my reply to the respective critiques by Corey Dyck, Marcel Quarfood and Andrew Stephenson of my book Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories (Palgrave 2012), I go over some of the main planks of my interpretation of the first step of the B-Deduction. In response to Dyck, I explain that there are several reasons why I believe that the deduction of the categories must indeed be seen as a logical derivation from the unity of apperception, and also (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
    Dennis Schulting offers a thoroughgoing, analytic account of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B-edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason that is different from existing interpretations in at least one important aspect: its central claim is that each of the 12 categories is wholly derivable from the principle of apperception, which goes against the current view that the Deduction is not a proof in a strict philosophical sense and the standard reading that in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Kant's Deduction and Apperception.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
    This book offers a thoroughgoing, analytic account of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B-edition of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason that is different from existing interpretations in at least one important aspect: its central claim is that each of the 12 categories is wholly derivable from the principle of apperception, which goes against the current view that the Deduction is not a proof in a strict philosophical sense and the standard reading that in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  52
    'An Almost Single Inference' – Kant's Deduction of the Categories Reconsidered.Konstantin Pollok - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (3):323-345.
    By taking into account some texts published between the first and the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason that have been neglected by most of those who have dealt with the deduction of the categories, I argue that the core of the deduction is to be identified as the ‘almost single inference from the precisely determined definition of a judgment in general’, which Kant adumbrates in the Metaphysical Foundations in order to ‘make up for the deficiency’ of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50. The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
    Kant wrote two versions of the Transcendental Deduction, the first, “A-”Deduction in 1781, and the second, “B-”Deduction in 1787. Since Henrich's “The Proof Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction”, most work on the Transcendental Deduction attempts to make sense of the B-Deduction's two-step argument structure. Though the A-Deduction has suffered comparative neglect, it has received some attention from interpreters who take its extended treatment of the “subjective” side of cognition to amount to a brand of proto-functionalism. Whatever the merits and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000