1.  8
    Empirical Developments in Retraction.B. K. Redman, H. N. Yarandi & J. F. Merz - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807-809.
    This study provides current data on key questions about retraction of scientific articles. Findings confirm that the rate of retractions remains low but is increasing. The most commonly cited reason for retraction was research error or inability to reproduce results; the rate from research misconduct is an underestimate, since some retractions necessitated by research misconduct were reported as being due to inability to reproduce. Retraction by parties other than authors is increasing, especially for research misconduct. Although retractions are on average (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  7
    Review of Measurement Instruments in Clinical and Research Ethics, 1999-2003. [REVIEW]B. K. Redman - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):153-156.
    Every field of practice has the responsibility to evaluate its outcomes and to test its theories. Evidence of the underdevelopment of measurement instruments in bioethics suggests that attending to strengthening existing instruments and developing new ones will facilitate the interpretation of accumulating bodies of research as well as the making of clinical judgements. A review of 65 instruments reported in the published literature showed 10 with even a minimal level of psychometric data. Two newly developed instruments provide examples of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Toward Attributes for Ethical Validity.B. K. Redman - 1996 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 7:251-256.
    Export citation  
  4.  18
    Clinical Practice Guidelines as Tools of Public Policy: Conflicts of Purpose, Issues of Autonomy, and Justice.B. K. Redman - 1994 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 5 (4):303.
    Direct download  
    Export citation