5 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Barbara Majcher-Iwanow [6]B. Majcher-Iwanow [1]
  1.  17
    Polish G-spaces and continuous logic.A. Ivanov & B. Majcher-Iwanow - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (4):749-775.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  19
    Eventually open action.Barbara Majcher-Iwanow - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1-2):95-104.
    We study a natural subclass of continuous actions of Polish groups on Polish spaces which we call eventually open actions. We prove that this property characterizes the actions endowed with a complete system of hereditarily countable invariant structures introduced by Hjorth as a generalization of Scott sentences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  93
    Gδ‐pieces of canonical partitions of G‐spaces.Barbara Majcher-Iwanow - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):450-461.
    Generalizing model companions from model theory we define companions of pieces of canonical partitions of Polish G-spaces. This unifies several constructions from logic. The central problem of the paper is the existence of companions which form a G-orbit which is a Gδ-set. We describe companions of some typical G-spaces.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  12
    Polish group actions and effectivity.Barbara Majcher-Iwanow - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):563-573.
    We extend a theorem of Barwise and Nadel describing the relationship between approximations of canonical Scott sentences and admissible sets to the case of orbit equivalence relations induced on an arbitrary Polish space by a Polish group action.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  31
    Polish group actions, nice topologies, and admissible sets.Barbara Majcher-Iwanow - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (6):597-616.
    Let G be a closed subgroup of S∞ and X be a Polish G -space. To every x ∈ X we associate an admissible set Ax and show how questions about X which involve Baire category can be formalized in Ax.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark