12 found
Order:
  1.  3
    Hypothesis Evaluation From a Bayesian Perspective.Baruch Fischhoff & Ruth Beyth-Marom - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (3):239-260.
  2.  15
    Evolving Judgments of Terror Risks: Foresight, Hindsight, and Emotion.Baruch Fischhoff, Roxana M. Gonzalez, Jennifer S. Lerner & Deborah A. Small - 2005 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (2):124-139.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  3.  10
    Negative Decision Outcomes Are More Common Among People with Lower Decision-Making Competence: An Item-Level Analysis of the Decision Outcome Inventory.Andrew M. Parker, Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Baruch Fischhoff - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  7
    Advertising Energy Saving Programs: The Potential Environmental Cost of Emphasizing Monetary Savings.Daniel Schwartz, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Baruch Fischhoff & Lester Lave - 2015 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 21 (2):158-166.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  21
    Promoting Protection Against a Threat That Evokes Positive Affect: The Case of Heat Waves in the United Kingdom.Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Carmen E. Lefevre, Andrea L. Taylor, Suraje Dessai, Baruch Fischhoff & Sari Kovats - 2016 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22 (3):261-271.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  6
    Evolving Judgments of Terror Risks: Foresight, Hindsight, and Emotion: A Reanalysis.Baruch Fischhoff, Roxana M. Gonzalez, Jennifer S. Lerner & Deborah A. Small - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (2):e1-e16.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  7
    Does “Putting on Your Thinking Cap” Reduce Myside Bias in Evaluation of Scientific Evidence?Caitlin Drummond & Baruch Fischhoff - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (4):477-505.
    The desire to maintain current beliefs can lead individuals to evaluate contrary evidence more critically than consistent evidence. We test whether priming individuals’ scientific reasoning...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  6
    Direct Measures of Availability and Judgments of Category Frequency.Ruth Beyth-Marom & Baruch Fischhoff - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 (3):236-238.
  9.  17
    Counting Casualties: A Framework for Respectful, Useful Records.Baruch Fischhoff, Scott Atran & Noam Fischhoff - unknown
    Counting casualties in conflict zones faces both practical and ethical concerns. Drawing on procedures from risk analysis, we propose a general approach. It represents each death by standard features, having either essential value, for capturing the social and cultural meaning of individual casualties, or instrumental value, for relating patterns of casualties to possible causes and effects. We illustrate the approach with the choices involved in attempts to record casualties in Iraq and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and with natural disasters, as exemplified (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  7
    "Evolving Judgments of Terror Risks: Foresight, Hindsight, and Emotion": Correction to Fischhoff Et Al.Baruch Fischhoff, Roxana M. Gonzalez, Jennifer S. Lerner & Deborah A. Small - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (2):212-212.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  4
    Commentary : Conflicts of Interest in Policy Analysis : Compliant Pawns in Their Game?Baruch Fischhoff - 2005 - In Don A. Moore (ed.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 263.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  2
    Mutually Assured Support: A Security Doctrine for Terrorist Nuclear Weapons Threats.Baruch Fischhoff, Scott Atran & Marc Sageman - unknown
    If the United States were subject to a terrorist nuclear attack, its president would face overwhelming political pressure to respond decisively. A well-prepared response could help both to prevent additional attacks and to bring the perpetrators to justice. An instinctive response could be cataclysmically ineffective, inflicting enormous collateral damage without achieving either deterrence or justice. An international security doctrine of Mutually Assured Support can make the response to such attacks more effective as well as less likely—by requiring preparations that reduce (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark