Order:
See also
Ben Cross
Wuhan University
Benjamin James Cross
University of Leeds
  1.  8
    Radicalizing Realist Legitimacy.Ben Cross - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (4):369-389.
    Several critics of realist theories of political legitimacy have alleged that it possesses a problematic bias towards the status quo. This bias is thought to be reflected in the way in which these...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  91
    Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument From Disagreement.Ben Cross - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (3):188-194.
    Several recent articles have weighed in on the question of whether moral philosophers can be counted as moral experts. One argument denying this has been rejected by both sides of the debate. According to this argument, the extent of disagreement in modern moral philosophy prevents moral philosophers from being classified as moral experts. Call this the Argument From Disagreement. In this article, I defend a version of AD. Insofar as practical issues in moral philosophy are characterized by disagreement between moral (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  27
    “Offensiphobia” is a Red Herring: On the Problem of Censorship and Academic Freedom.Ben Cross & Louise Richardson-Self - 2020 - Journal of Ethics 24 (1):31-54.
    In a recent article, J. Angelo Corlett criticises what he takes to be the ‘offensiphobic’ practices characteristic of many universities. The ‘offensiphobe’, according to Corlett, believes that offensive speech ought to be censured precisely because it offends. We argue that there are three serious problems with Corlett’s discussion. First, his criticism of ‘offensiphobia’ misrepresents the kinds of censorship practiced by universities; many universities may in some way censure speech which they regard as offensive, but this is seldom if ever a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  32
    Rawlsian Liberalism, Justice for the Worst Off, and the Limited Capacity of Political Institutions.Ben Cross - 2016 - Sophia 55 (2):215-236.
    This article argues that Rawlsian liberal political institutions are incapable of ensuring that the basic welfare needs of the worst off are met. This argument consists of two steps. First, I show that institutions are incapable of ensuring that the basic needs of the worst off are met without pursuing certain non-taxation-based courses of action that are designed to alter the work choices of citizens. Second, I argue that such actions are not permissible for Rawlsian institutions. It follows that a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  27
    Naturalist Political Realism and the First Political Question.Ben Cross - 2018 - Ratio 31 (S1):81-95.
    Many political realists reject the idea that the first task for political philosophy is to justify the existence of coercive political institutions. Instead, they say, we should begin with the factual existence of CPIs, and ask how they ought to be structured. In holding this view, they adopt a form of political naturalism that is broadly Aristotelian in character. In this article, I distinguish between two forms that this political naturalism might take - what I call a ‘strong’ form, and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  22
    Why Inconclusiveness is a Problem for Public Reason.Ben Cross & Thomas M. Besch - 2019 - Law and Philosophy 38 (4):407-432.
    Most theorists of public reason, including both its proponents and critics, now accept that it is inconclusive, meaning that its correct application can result in a plurality of reasonable solutions to the issues it addresses. While some early critics argued that the inconclusiveness of public reason presented a serious problem for political legitimacy – a charge often associated with ‘the completeness objection’ – defenders of public reason have generally dismissed this objection on the grounds that political legitimacy does not hinge (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  20
    Analysing Political Deception: The Virtues of Bernard Williams' Anti‐Tyranny Argument.Ben Cross - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):324-336.
    European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  10
    Deliberative Systems Theory and Activism.Ben Cross - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-18.
  9.  17
    Public Reason and the Exclusion of Oppressed Groups.Ben Cross - 2017 - Dialogue 56 (2):241-265.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  13
    Autonomy and Moral Deference.Ben Cross - 2017 - South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):278-291.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  2
    Intolerance and Argument Expression.Ben Cross - 2019 - Social Theory and Practice 45 (3):329-352.
    Most philosophers seem to think that argument expression is not normally a form of intolerance. Call this the ‘argument-friendly view’ of intolerance. In this article, I argue that the case for the argument-friendly view is much weaker than commonly thought. I consider three possible arguments for the argument-friendly view and conclude that all three fail. This leaves us with a choice: either reject the argument-friendly view, or accept it as a feature of the concept of tolerance which has no rational (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  2
    Intolerance and Argument Expression in Advance.Ben Cross - forthcoming - Social Theory and Practice.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark