Results for 'Benchmarking'

739 found
Order:
  1.  22
    Benchmarking en el sector público: aportes y propuestas de implementación para la provincia de Buenos Aires.Federico Del Giorgio Solfa - 2012 - Villa Elisa, Provincia de Buenos Aires: FDGS.
    El tema de este trabajo es el benchmarking en el sector público. Esta investigación, parte del interés por analizar la importancia que ha cobrado el benchmarking en el sector como herramienta de mejora e innovación de la gestión pública donde los Estados comprometen esfuerzos para conseguir calidad, eficiencia y eficacia en los servicios que presta. En esta lógica se inscribe el principal objetivo, que consiste en realizar aportes y propuestas, para la implementación de herramientas de benchmarking en (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  32
    Öffentliches Benchmarking : beiträge für subnationale regierungen und Benchmarking design.Federico Del Giorgio Solfa - 2019 - Villa Elisa, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: FDGS.
    The subject of this book is benchmarking in the public sector and part of the interest is to analyze the importance that benchmarking has acquired in this sector - as a tool for improving and innovating public administration - when states strive for quality, efficiency and effectiveness of the services offered. The study is exploratory and descriptive and uses a qualitative methodology that combines a bibliographic analysis to develop the theoretical framework and the definition of the types and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  22
    Public Benchmarking: contributions for subnational governments and Benchmarking Design.Federico Del Giorgio Solfa - 2017 - Villa Elisa, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: FDGS.
    The theme of this book is benchmarking in the public sector and part of the interest to analyze the importance that benchmarking has gained in the sector -as a tool for improvement and innovation of public management- where States commit efforts to achieve quality, efficiency and effectiveness in the services it provides. The study is exploratory and descriptive, employing a qualitative methodology that combines a bibliographic analysis for the elaboration of the theoretical framework and the definition of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Measuring progress in robotics: Benchmarking and the ‘measure-target confusion’.Vincent C. Müller - 2019 - In Fabio Bonsignorio, John Hallam, Elena Messina & Angel P. Del Pobil (eds.), Metrics of sensory motor coordination and integration in robots and animals. Springer. pp. 169-179.
    While it is often said that robotics should aspire to reproducible and measurable results that allow benchmarking, I argue that a focus on benchmarking can be a hindrance for progress in robotics. The reason is what I call the ‘measure-target confusion’, the confusion between a measure of progress and the target of progress. Progress on a benchmark (the measure) is not identical to scientific or technological progress (the target). In the past, several academic disciplines have been led into (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. A critique of benchmark theory.Robert Bassett - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):241-267.
    Benchmark theory , introduced by Ralph Wedgwood, departs from decision theories of pure expectation maximization like evidential decision theory and causal decision theory and instead ranks actions according to the desirability of an outcome they produce in some state of affairs compared to a standard—a benchmark—for that state of affairs. Wedgwood motivates BT through what he terms Gandalf’s principle, that the merits of an action in a given state should be evaluated relative only to the performances of other actions in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  6.  27
    Utilitarian benchmarks for emissions and pledges promote equity, climate and development.Mark Budolfson - 2021 - Nature Climate Change 11:827–833.
    Tools are needed to benchmark carbon emissions and pledges against criteria of equity and fairness. However, standard economic approaches, which use a transparent optimization framework, ignore equity. Models that do include equity benchmarks exist, but often use opaque methodologies. Here we propose a utilitarian benchmark computed in a transparent optimization framework, which could usefully inform the equity benchmark debate. Implementing the utilitarian benchmark, which we see as ethically minimal and conceptually parsimonious, in two leading climate–economy models allows for calculation of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  10
    Benchmarking and Transparency: Incentives for the Pharmaceutical Industry's Corporate Social Responsibility.Matthew Lee & Julian Kohler - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):641 - 658.
    With over 2 billion people lacking medicines for treatable diseases and 14 million people dying annually from infectious disease, there is undeniable need for increased access to medicines. There has been an increasing trend to benchmark the pharmaceutical industry on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in access to medicines. Benchmarking creates a competitive inter-business environment and acts as incentive for improving CSR. This article investigates the corporate feedback discourses pharmaceutical companies make in response to criticisms from benchmarking (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  8.  25
    Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics.David Feil-Seifer, Kristine Skinner & Maja J. Matarić - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (3):423-439.
    Socially assistive robotics is a growing area of research. Evaluating SAR systems presents novel challenges. Using a robot for a socially assistive task can have various benefits and ethical implications. Many questions are important to understanding whether a robot is effective for a given application domain. This paper describes several benchmarks for evaluating SAR systems. There exist numerous methods for evaluating the many factors involved in a robot’s design. Benchmarks from psychology, anthropology, medicine, and human–robot interaction are proposed as measures (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  55
    Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics.David Feil-Seifer, Kristine Skinner & Maja J. Matarić - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):423-439.
    Socially assistive robotics is a growing area of research. Evaluating SAR systems presents novel challenges. Using a robot for a socially assistive task can have various benefits and ethical implications. Many questions are important to understanding whether a robot is effective for a given application domain. This paper describes several benchmarks for evaluating SAR systems. There exist numerous methods for evaluating the many factors involved in a robot’s design. Benchmarks from psychology, anthropology, medicine, and human–robot interaction are proposed as measures (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  36
    Benchmark values for higher order coefficients of relative risk aversion.Michel Denuit & Béatrice Rey - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (1):81-94.
    The existing literature on savings, insurance, and portfolio choices under risk has revealed that quite often comparative statics results depend, among other things, upon the values of the coefficients of relative risk aversion and relative prudence. More specifically the benchmark values for these coefficients are, respectively, one and two. Recently, several papers investigated constraints on the higher degree extensions of the coefficients of relative risk aversion and of relative prudence. The present work provides a unified approach to this question based (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  65
    Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: Methodological problems and robustness. [REVIEW]Johan J. Graafland, S. C. W. Eijffinger & H. SmidJohan - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):137-152.
    This paper investigates the possibilities and problems of benchmarking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). After a methodological analysis of the advantages and problems of benchmarking, we develop a benchmark method that includes economic, social and environmental aspects as well as national and international aspects of CSR. The overall benchmark is based on a weighted average of these aspects. The weights are based on the opinions of companies and NGO's. Using different methods of weighting, we find that the outcome of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  12. A definition, benchmark and database of AI for social good initiatives.Josh Cowls, Andreas Tsmadaos, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi - 2021 - Nature Machine Intelligence 3:111–⁠115.
    Initiatives relying on artificial intelligence (AI) to deliver socially beneficial outcomes—AI for social good (AI4SG)—are on the rise. However, existing attempts to understand and foster AI4SG initiatives have so far been limited by the lack of normative analyses and a shortage of empirical evidence. In this Perspective, we address these limitations by providing a definition of AI4SG and by advocating the use of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a benchmark for tracing the scope and spread of AI4SG. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  13.  23
    Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABC TM s of benchmarking.Norman W. Weissman, Jeroan J. Allison, Catarina I. Kiefe, Robert M. Farmer, Michael T. Weaver, O. Dale Williams, Ian G. Child, Judy H. Pemberton, Kathleen C. Brown & C. Suzanne Baker - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):269-281.
  14.  83
    Normative benchmarks are useful for studying individual differences in reasoning.Edward Jn Stupple & Linden J. Ball - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):270-271.
    We applaud many aspects of Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) call for a descriptivist research programme in studying reasoning. Nevertheless, we contend that normative benchmarks are vital for understanding individual differences in performance. We argue that the presence of normative responses to particular problems by certain individuals should inspire researchers to look for converging evidence for analytic processing that may have a normative basis.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15. Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform.Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light & Ronald L. Caplan - 1998 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41 (4):605.
  16.  67
    Benchmarking and Transparency: Incentives for the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW]Matthew Lee & Jillian Kohler - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):641-658.
    With over 2 billion people lacking medicines for treatable diseases and 14 million people dying annually from infectious disease, there is undeniable need for increased access to medicines. There has been an increasing trend to benchmark the pharmaceutical industry on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in access to medicines. Benchmarking creates a competitive inter-business environment and acts as incentive for improving CSR. This article investigates the corporate feedback discourses pharmaceutical companies make in response to criticisms from benchmarking (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  17.  10
    Benchmark Pashto Handwritten Character Dataset and Pashto Object Character Recognition (OCR) Using Deep Neural Network with Rule Activation Function.Imran Uddin, Dzati A. Ramli, Abdullah Khan, Javed Iqbal Bangash, Nosheen Fayyaz, Asfandyar Khan & Mahwish Kundi - 2021 - Complexity 2021:1-16.
    In the area of machine learning, different techniques are used to train machines and perform different tasks like computer vision, data analysis, natural language processing, and speech recognition. Computer vision is one of the main branches where machine learning and deep learning techniques are being applied. Optical character recognition is the ability of a machine to recognize the character of a language. Pashto is one of the most ancient and historical languages of the world, spoken in Afghanistan and Pakistan. OCR (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  38
    Human benchmarks on ai's benchmark problems.Jeff Pelletier - unknown
    Default reasoning occurs when the available information does not deductively guarantee the truth of the conclusion; and the conclusion is nonetheless correctly arrived at. The formalisms that have been developed in Artificial Intelligence to capture this mode of reasoning have suffered from a lack of agreement as to which non-monotonic inferences should be considered correct; and so Lifschitz 1989 produced a set of “Nonmonotonic Benchmark Problems” which all future formalisms are supposed to honor. The present work investigates the extent to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  33
    Costs Benchmarks as Criterion for Evaluation of Predatory Pricing.Raimundas Moisejevas, Ana Novosad & Virginijus Bitė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):585-603.
    Predatory pricing is one of the forms of the abuse of a dominant position. Judicial institutions of the European Union and Commission during analysis of predatory pricing devote main attention to the relationship between costs and prices of the dominant undertaking. Moreover, attention is paid also to various cost benchmarks: average variable costs, average avoidable costs, average total costs and long run average incremental costs. European judicial institutions should pay less attention to the costs of a dominant undertaking than to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  17
    Benchmarking administration: University s experience in student an Australian.Clare Mcgee & Graeme Chandler - 1998 - Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 2 (2):38-44.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  9
    Multifactorial Benchmarking of Longitudinal Player Performance in the Australian Football League.Sam McIntosh, Stephanie Kovalchik & Sam Robertson - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  7
    Benchmarking Scientific Image Forgery Detectors.João P. Cardenuto & Anderson Rocha - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (4):1-38.
    The field of scientific image integrity presents a challenging research bottleneck given the lack of available datasets to design and evaluate forensic techniques. The sensitivity of data also creates a legal hurdle that restricts the use of real-world cases to build any accessible forensic benchmark. In light of this, there is no comprehensive understanding on the limitations and capabilities of automatic image analysis tools for scientific images, which might create a false sense of data integrity. To mitigate this issue, we (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  33
    Benchmarking Tendencies in Managerial Mindsets: Prioritizing Stockholders and Stakeholders in Peru, South Africa, and the United States.John A. Parnell, Gregory J. Scott & Georgios Angelopoulos - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):589-605.
    Managers in Peru, South Africa, and the United States were classified into four groups along Singhapakdi et al. (J Bus Ethics 15:1131–1140, 1996) Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility (PRESOR) scale. In Peru and the United States, individuals in the ethics and social responsibility first category reported greater satisfaction with organizational performance than did those in the profits first category. Moral capitalists—individuals who report high emphases on both social responsibility and profits—reported the highest satisfaction with performance in the United (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24. Benchmarking boiler tube failures-Part 1.James Patrick, Robert Oldani & Daryl von Behren - 2005 - In Alan F. Blackwell & David MacKay (eds.), Power. Cambridge University Press. pp. 30-31.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Benchmark programs for evaluating knowledge-based performance requirements.Mary M. Hayes Karen L. Ruoff - forthcoming - Annual Ai Systems in Government Conference: Proceedings.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  9
    Benchmarking- is it worth it?John Housley - 1999 - Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 3 (3):74-79.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  7
    Benchmarking in university administration - a case study from the University of Copenhagen.Bente Hagelund - 1999 - Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 3 (3):89-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Benchmarks for.Rom Harre - 2004 - In Jennifer Radden (ed.), The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion. Oxford University Press. pp. 409.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Benchmarks for Psychiatric Concepts.Rom Harre - 2007 - In Jennifer Radden (ed.), The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion. Oup Usa.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  7
    A Benchmark Similarity Measures for Fermatean Fuzzy Sets.Faiz Muhammad Khan, Imran Khan & Waqas Ahmad - 2022 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 51 (2):207-226.
    In this paper, we utilized triangular conorms. The essence of using S-norm is that the similarity order does not change using different norms. In fact, we are investigating for a new conception for calculating the similarity of two Fermatean fuzzy sets. For this purpose, utilizing an S-norm, we first present a formula for calculating the similarity of two Fermatean fuzzy values, so that they are truthful in similarity properties. Following that, we generalize a formula for calculating the similarity of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  15
    Benchmarking the moral decision-making strength of european biotech companies: A european research project.Annette Kleinfeld - 2001 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 10 (2):122–139.
    Biotechnology companies have been forced to take account of the social and ethical pressures which increasingly surround their activities. A research project was undertaken with the aims of identifying the practices and procedures which companies put in place as a response to these pressures, and of advising the European Commission on ways by which interaction between these companies and their stakeholders might be improved. Two questionnaires were administered, and although the response rate was not high a reasonably balanced sample was (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  15
    Benchmarking the moral decision-making strength of European biotech companies: a European research project.Annette Kleinfeld - 2001 - Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (2):122-139.
    Biotechnology companies have been forced to take account of the social and ethical pressures which increasingly surround their activities. A research project was undertaken with the aims (a) of identifying the practices and procedures which companies put in place as a response to these pressures, and (b) of advising the European Commission on ways by which interaction between these companies and their stakeholders might be improved. Two questionnaires were administered, and although the response rate was not high a reasonably balanced (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  16
    The Brokenness of Being: lacanian theory and benchmark traumas.Hilary Neroni & Mari Ruti - 2023 - Angelaki 28 (6):123-170.
    In “The Brokenness of Being,” Mari Ruti investigates the impact that trauma can have on being. Informed by her own experience of breast cancer, Ruti argues that there are some traumatic experiences that entirely change one’s symbolic coordinates. She calls these types of experiences benchmark traumas. Diagnosed with terminal cancer, Ruti boldly explores how encountering a benchmark trauma forced her to recognize the brokenness of her being. She theorizes that this recognition reveals the split in the subject. Encountering this brokenness, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. The benchmark of patriotism-A review of'Wan qing da bianju zhong de sichao yu renwu'(Yuan Weishi on China's intellectual elite).Z. Y. Zi - 1997 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 28 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  45
    Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments.Timo W. M. van den Brink & Frans van der Woerd - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):187-203.
    This paper investigates the state of the art with respect to sustainability reporting, its linkages with the corporations, internal measurement and monitoring systems and their combined impact on the quality of contemporary sustainability benchmarks, developed by SRI analysts and so-called rating and screening agencies. This research originated from the EU-funded research initiative to create a new generation management framework for corporate sustainability and responsibility (CS-R). The aim of it is to develop a coherent set of assessment –, measurement – and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  36. Joint Doctrine Ontology: A Benchmark for Military Information Systems Interoperability.Peter Morosoff, Ron Rudnicki, Jason Bryant, Robert Farrell & Barry Smith - 2015 - In Semantic Technology for Intelligence, Defense and Security (STIDS). CEUR vol. 1325. pp. 2-9.
    When the U.S. conducts warfare, elements of a force are drawn from different services and work together as a single team to accomplish an assigned mission. To achieve such unified action, it is necessary that the doctrines governing the actions of members of specific services be both consistent with and subservient to joint Doctrine. Because warfighting today increasingly involves not only live forces but also automated systems, unified action requires that information technology that is used in joint warfare must be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  38
    More on benchmarks of fairness: Response to Ballantyne.Trisha Phillips - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (1):49-56.
    This paper challenges the fitness of Angela Ballantyne's proposed theory of exploitation by situating her ‘fair risk account’ in an ongoing dialogue about the adequacy conditions for benchmarks of fairness. It identifies four adequacy conditions: (1) the ability to focus on level rather than type of benefit; (2) the ability to focus on micro-level rather than macro-level fairness; (3) the ability to prevent discrimination based on need; and (4) the ability to prescribe a certain distribution as superior to all others. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38.  2
    A large scale benchmark for session-based recommendations on the legal domain.Marcos Aurélio Domingues, Edleno Silva de Moura, Leandro Balby Marinho & Altigran da Silva - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-36.
    The proliferation of legal documents in various formats and their dispersion across multiple courts present a significant challenge for users seeking precise matches to their information requirements. Despite notable advancements in legal information retrieval systems, research into legal recommender systems remains limited. A plausible factor contributing to this scarcity could be the absence of extensive publicly accessible datasets or benchmarks. While a few studies have emerged in this field, a comprehensive analysis of the distinct attributes of legal data that influence (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  62
    Virtue as a benchmark for spirituality in business.Gerald F. Cavanagh & Mark R. Bandsuch - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):109 - 117.
    Business people often consider spirituality a means of increasing integrity, motivation and job satisfaction. Yet certain spiritualities are superficial and unstable. Religion gives depth and duration to a spirituality, but may also sew divisiveness. A spirituality's ability to develop good moral habits provides a positive test of the "appropriateness" of that spirituality for business. Many successful business executives demonstrate a spirituality that does develop good moral habits.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  40.  40
    The “Indefinite Discipline” of Competitiveness Benchmarking as a Neoliberal Technology of Government.Isabelle Bruno - 2009 - Minerva 47 (3):261-280.
    Working on the assumption that ideas are embedded in socio-technical arrangements which actualize them, this essay sheds light on the way the Open Method of Co-ordination (OMC) achieves the Lisbon strategic goal: to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world . Rather than framing the issue in utilitarian terms, it focuses attention on quantified indicators, comparable statistics and common targets resulting from the increasing practice of intergovernmental benchmarking, in order to tackle the following questions: how (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  41.  19
    Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams.Victoria Groom & Clifford Nass - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):483-500.
  42.  16
    Foundational patterns benchmark.Jana Ahmad & Petr Křemen - 2022 - Applied ontology 17 (4):465-494.
    Recently, there has been growing interest in the use of ontology as a fundamental tool for representing domain-specific conceptual models to improve the semantics, accuracy, and relevance of domain users’ query results. Although the amount of data has grown steadily over the past decade, much data shares similar characteristics that can be captured by a foundational ontology. In this paper, we show how queries based on a foundational ontology can be evaluated and their performance measured. We also present a Foundational (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  38
    Can robots be teammates? benchmarks in humanrobot teams.Victoria Groom & Clifford Nass - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):483-500.
  44.  37
    Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):221 - 253.
    Dispute types can roughly be divided in two classes. One class in whichthe notion of justification is fundamental, and one in which thenotion of opposition is fundamental. Further, for every singledispute type there exist various types of protocols to conduct such adispute. Some protocols permit local search (a process in which oneis allowed to justify claims partially, with the possibility to extendjustifications on request later), while other protocols rely on globalsearch (a process in which only entire arguments count as justifications).This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  8
    Eight Dialectic Benchmarks Discussed By Two Artificial Localist Disputors.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):221-253.
    Dispute types can roughly be divided in two classes. One class in whichthe notion of justification is fundamental, and one in which thenotion of opposition is fundamental. Further, for every singledispute type there exist various types of protocols to conduct such adispute. Some protocols permit local search (a process in which oneis allowed to justify claims partially, with the possibility to extendjustifications on request later), while other protocols rely on globalsearch (a process in which only entire arguments count as justifications).This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  5
    Nonverbal intimacy as a benchmark for human–robot interaction.Billy Lee - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (3):411-422.
    Studies of human–human interactions indicate that relational dimensions, which are largely nonverbal, include intimacy/involvement, status/control, and emotional valence. This paper devises codes from a study of couples and strangers which may be behavior-mapped on to next generation android bodies. The codes provide act specifications for a possible benchmark of nonverbal intimacy in human–robot interaction. The appropriateness of emotionally intimate behaviors for androids is considered. The design and utility of the android counselor/psychotherapist is explored, whose body is equipped with semi-autonomous visceral (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  93
    Proposing Metrics for Benchmarking Novel EEG Technologies Towards Real-World Measurements.Anderson S. Oliveira, Bryan R. Schlink, W. David Hairston, Peter König & Daniel P. Ferris - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
  48.  8
    ASlib: A benchmark library for algorithm selection.Bernd Bischl, Pascal Kerschke, Lars Kotthoff, Marius Lindauer, Yuri Malitsky, Alexandre Fréchette, Holger Hoos, Frank Hutter, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Kevin Tierney & Joaquin Vanschoren - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 237 (C):41-58.
  49. Whose ethics? The benchmark problem in legal ethics research.Elizabeth Chambliss - 2012 - In Leslie C. Levin & Lynn Mather (eds.), Lawyers in practice: ethical decision making in context. London: University of Chicago Press. pp. 47.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  32
    Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools.Christian O'Reilly & Tore Nielsen - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
1 — 50 / 739