30 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Bernadette Richards [27]Bernadette J. Richards [4]
  1.  3
    Balancing Interests in Healthcare: What Happens When Commercial Interests Outweigh Patient Welfare and a Brief Overview of the Swinging Pendulum of Informed Consent in Singapore.Bernadette Richards - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):15-20.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  13
    Device Representatives in Hospitals: Are Commercial Imperatives Driving Clinical Decision-Making?Quinn Grundy, Katrina Hutchison, Jane Johnson, Brette Blakely, Robyn Clay-Wlliams, Bernadette Richards & Wendy A. Rogers - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (9):589-592.
    Despite concerns about the relationships between health professionals and the medical device industry, the issue has received relatively little attention. Prevalence data are lacking; however, qualitative and survey research suggest device industry representatives, who are commonly present in clinical settings, play a key role in these relationships. Representatives, who are technical product specialists and not necessarily medically trained, may attend surgeries on a daily basis and be available to health professionals 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to provide (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  4
    Mitochondrial Donation: The Australian Story.Dianne Nicol & Bernadette Richards - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):161-164.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  9
    Considering Professional Misconduct and Best Interests of a Child.Michaela Okninski & Bernadette Richards - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):19-22.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  13
    Considering Professional Misconduct and Best Interests of a Child.Michaela Okninski & Bernadette Richards - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):19-22.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  7
    Considering the Boundaries of Decision-Making Authority: An NHS Trust V Y [2018] UKSC 46.Bernadette Richards - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):153-157.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  13
    Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-Visited.Bernadette Richards & Michaela E. Okninski - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):467-471.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  12
    Social Media: The Unnamed Plaintiff.Bernadette Richards - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (3):309-312.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  12
    Assisted Dying in Australia and Limiting Court Involvement in Withdrawal of Nutrition and Hydration.Bernadette Richards & John Coggon - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (1):15-18.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  22
    Stretching the Boundaries of Parental Responsibility and New Legal Guidelines for Determination of Brain Death.Bernadette Richards & Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):323-328.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  16
    Regulating the New: A Consideration of CRISPR and Approaches to Professional Standards of Practitioners of Chinese Medicine in Australia and Accessing the NDIS.Barry R. Furrow & Bernadette J. Richards - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):167-172.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  4
    The Medical Innovation Bill: Still More Harm Than Good.Bernadette Richards, Gerard Porter, Wendy Lipworth & Tamra Lysaght - 2015 - Clinical Ethics 10 (1-2):1-4.
    The Medical Innovation Bill continues its journey through Parliament. On 23 January 2015, it was debated for the final time in the House of Lords and with one final amendment, the House moved to support the Bill, which then moved to the House of Commons on 26 January. It will be debated again on 27 February 2015. The Bill’s purpose is to encourage responsible innovation in medical treatment. Although this goal is laudable, it is argued that the Bill is unnecessary (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  14
    Regulating Consent to Organ and Embryo Donation: The Legal Dimensions of the Problem.Ngaire Naffine & Bernadette Richards - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):49-55.
    As rational adults, we are free to elect what is (or is not) done to our bodies. However, this strong freedom does not extend to the borders of life. Control over the uses of our biological material is constrained and uncertain at law. Our article examines the legal condition of embryos and organs: how law conceptualises them and regulates their uses.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  28
    Making Decisions.Bernadette Richards, Tom Hayes & Mabel Tsui - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (4):385-393.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  34
    Considering the “Born-Alive” Rule and Possession of Sperm Following Death.Bernadette Richards, Bill Madden & Tina Cockburn - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):323-327.
    Considering the “Born-Alive” Rule and Possession of Sperm Following Death Content Type Journal Article Category Recent Developments Pages 323-327 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9324-0 Authors Bernadette Richards, Law School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Bill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Tina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 8 Journal Issue Volume 8, Number 4.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  49
    Who Makes the Decisions, Especially When It Concerns Minors?Thaddeus Mason Pope & Bernadette Richards - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):441-444.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  6
    Professional Conduct and Making Decisions for Minors.Bernadette Richards & Cameron Stewart - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):11-15.
  18.  22
    Beyond Autonomy: Limits and Alternatives to Informed Consent in Research Ethics and Law.David G. Kirchhoffer & Bernadette J. Richards (eds.) - 2019 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Respect for autonomy has become a fundamental principle in human research ethics. Nonetheless, this principle and the associated process of obtaining informed consent do have limitations. This can lead to some groups, many of them vulnerable, being left understudied. This book considers these limitations and contributes through legal and philosophical analyses to the search for viable approaches to human research ethics. It explores the limitations of respect for autonomy and informed consent both in law and through the examination of cases (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Ethical and Regulatory Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Medical Devices Industry and its Representatives.Guy Maddern, Bernadette Richards, Robyn Clay-Williams, Katrina Hutchison, Quinn Grundy, Jane Johnson, Wendy Rogers & Brette Blakely - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-7.
    The development and deployment of medical devices, along with most areas of healthcare, has been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has had variable ethical implications, two of which we will focus on here. First, medical device regulations have been rapidly amended to expedite approvals of devices ranging from face masks to ventilators. Although some regulators have issued cessation dates, there is inadequate discussion of triggers for exiting these crisis standards, and evidence that this may not be feasible. Given (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  32
    Decision-Making: At the End of Life and the Provision of Pretreatment Advice.Thaddeus Mason Pope & Bernadette J. Richards - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):389-394.
  21.  28
    Organ Donation, Discrimination After Death, Anti-Vaccination Sentiments, and Tuberculosis Management.John Coggon, Bill Madden, Tina Cockburn, Cameron Stewart, Jerome Amir Singh, Anant Bhan, Ross E. Upshur & Bernadette Richards - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):125-133.
  22.  32
    Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour.Cameron Stewart, Bernadette Richards, Richard Huxtable, Bill Madden & Tina Cockburn - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):7-14.
    Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour Content Type Journal Article Category Recent Developments Pages 7-14 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9347-6 Authors Cameron Stewart, Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006 Bernadette Richards, Law School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5005 Richard Huxtable, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH UK Bill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Tina (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  11
    Exploring the Boundaries of Autonomy and the 'Right' to Access Innovative Stem Cell Therapies.Tamra Lysaght, Bernadette Richards & Anantharaman Muralidharan - 2017 - Asian Bioethics Review 9 (1-2):45-60.
    Demands for improved access to innovative therapies have prompted a discourse that claims patients have rights to access treatments that may be of benefit, even if evidence that demonstrates safety and efficacy is lacking. This rights-based discourse is grounded in accounts of autonomy and assertions claiming that the state ought to not interfere with the free choices of patients and clinical decision-making. In this essay, we scrutinise these arguments to defend the ethical and legal permissibility of interference in contexts where (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  16
    Investigating Research and Accessing Reproductive Material.Trudo Lemmens & Bernadette J. Richards - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (1):11-19.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  5
    Clarifying legal tests: Who a parent is and how to warn of unknown risks.Bernadette Richards - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (3):301-304.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  16
    Informing Patients and Making Decisions.Bernadette Richards & John Coggon - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):139-143.
  27.  12
    Property in Tissue and Negligent Conception.Bernadette Richards - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (4):437-440.
    Property in Human Tissue It seems that a recurring theme in our Recent Developments is the issue of property rights in tissue . This has most commonly been associated with access to reproductive material and begins from the presumption of no property in tissue. A recent decision for the Superior Court of Justice, Ontario, whilst unsuccessful on largely procedural grounds, warrants a brief note because it adds to the general discourse on property in tissue and adopts a different approach. Piljak (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  19
    Recent Developments.Bernadette Richards, Bill Madden & Tina Cockburn - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):113-119.
    Recent Developments Content Type Journal Article Pages 113-119 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9300-8 Authors Bernadette Richards, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Bill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Tina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 8 Journal Issue Volume 8, Number 2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  9
    Supporting Innovation in the UK: Care Act 2014: Developments in Social Care Legislation in England and the Medical Innovation Bill.Bernadette Richards & Laura Williamson - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):183-187.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  5
    Untangling the Surrogacy Web and Exploring Legal Duties Following the Discharge of Mental Health Patients.Tina Cockburn, Bill Madden & Bernadette Richards - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (1):25-29.
    Untangling the Surrogacy WebSurrogacy agreements represent unique legal questions that must be answered with great care. In Australia we had the recent “Baby Gammy” scandal that involved an international surrogacy agreement and claims of abandonment of a child with Down’s syndrome. This story served to reinforce concerns that surrogacy turns children into a commodity that can be put to one side if expectations are not met. Of course, surrogacy agreements do not always end in this manner and often the outcome (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark