11 found
Order:
  1.  67
    Self-Awareness ( Svasaṃvedana ) in Dignāga's Pramāṇasamuccaya and - Vṛtti : A Close Reading.Birgit Kellner - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):203-231.
    The concept of “self-awareness” ( svasaṃvedana ) enters Buddhist epistemological discourse in the Pramāṇasamuccaya and - vṛtti by Dignāga (ca. 480–540), the founder of the Buddhist logico-epistemological tradition. Though some of the key passages have already been dealt with in various publications, no attempt has been made to comprehensively examine all of them as a whole. A close reading is here proposed to make up for this deficit. In connection with a particularly difficult passage (PS(V) 1.8cd-10) that presents the means (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2.  22
    Changing Frames in Buddhist Thought: The Concept of Ākāra in Abhidharma and in Buddhist Epistemological Analysis. [REVIEW]Birgit Kellner - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (2-3):275-295.
    It has been argued that the use of the concept of ākāra—a mental “form,” “appearance” or “aspect”—in Buddhist epistemological analysis or pramāṇa exhibits continuities with earlier Buddhist thinking about mental processes, in particular in Abhidharma. A detailed inquiry into uses of the term ākāra in pertinent contexts in Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośabhāṣya brings to light different semantic nuances and functions of this term. The characteristic use of ākāra in Buddhist epistemological discourse turns out to be continuous with only some of the nuances (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  38
    Self-Awareness (Svasaṃvedana) and Infinite Regresses: A Comparison of Arguments by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti.Birgit Kellner - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):411-426.
    This paper compares and contrasts two infinite regress arguments against higher-order theories of consciousness that were put forward by the Buddhist epistemologists Dignāga (ca. 480–540 CE) and Dharmakīrti (ca. 600–660). The two arguments differ considerably from each other, and they also differ from the infinite regress argument that scholars usually attribute to Dignāga or his followers. The analysis shows that the two philosophers, in these arguments, work with different assumptions for why an object-cognition must be cognised: for Dignāga it must (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  11
    Ākāra in Buddhist Philosophical and Soteriological Analysis: Introduction.Birgit Kellner & Sara McClintock - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (4):427-432.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  6
    Integrating Negative Knowledge Into PramānMa Theory: The Development of the Drśyânupalabdhi Dharmaki¯ Rti's Earlier Works.Birgit Kellner - 2003 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 (1-3):121-159.
    Direct download (5 more)   Export citation   My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Jñānaśrimitra's Anupalabdhirahasya and Sarvaśabdābhāvacarcā: A Critical Edition with a Survey of His Anupalabdhi-Theory.Birgit Kellner - 2007 - Arbeitskreis für Tibetische Und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  6
    Negation €“ Failure or Success? Remarks on an Allegedly Characteristic Trait of DharmakÄ«Rti's Anupalabdhi- Theory.Birgit Kellner - 2001 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 (5/6):495-517.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  5
    Erratum To: Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 42, No. 2‒3.Birgit Kellner & Sara McClintock - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (4):425-426.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Upalabdhy-Abhâva-Mâtra or Adarœana-Mâtra,'Mere Absence of Perception'/'Mere Non-Perception.'2.Birgit Kellner & in Dharmakîrti’S. Earlier Works - 2003 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 31:121-159.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. [REVIEW]Helmut Krasser, Horst Lasic, Eli Franco & Birgit Kellner (eds.) - 2011 - Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Much Ado About Nothing: Kumārila, Śāntarakṣita, and Dharmakīrti on the Cognition of Non-BeingNichts Bleibt Nichts: Die Buddhistische Zurückweisung von Kumārila's Abhāvapramāṇa; Übersetzung Und Interpretation von Śāntarakṣita's Tattvasaṅgraha Vv. 1647-1690 MIT Kamalaśīla's Tattvasaṅgrahapañjikā Sowie Ansätze Und Arbeitshypothese Zur Geschichte Negativer Erkenntnis in der Indischen PhilosophieMuch Ado About Nothing: Kumarila, Santaraksita, and Dharmakirti on the Cognition of Non-BeingNichts Bleibt Nichts: Die Buddhistische Zuruckweisung von Kumarila's Abhavapramana; Ubersetzung Und Interpretation von Santaraksita's Tattvasangraha Vv. 1647-1690 MIT Kamalasila's Tattvasangrahapanjika Sowie Ansatze Und Arbeitshypothese Zur Geschichte Negativer Erkenntnis in der Indischen Philosophie. [REVIEW]John Taber & Birgit Kellner - 2001 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 121 (1):72.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography