Order:
See also
Bob Plant
University of Aberdeen (PhD)
  1.  30
    Doing Justice to the Derrida–Levinas Connection: A Response to Mark Dooley.Bob Plant - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):427-450.
    Mark Dooley has recently argued (principally against Simon Critchley) that the attempt to establish too strong a ‘connection’ between Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas not only distorts crucial disparities between their respective philosophies, it also contaminates Derrida’s recent work with Levinas’s inherent ‘political naivety’. In short, on Dooley’s reading, Levinas is only of ‘inspirational value’ for Derrida. I am not concerned with defending Critchley’s own reading of the ‘Derrida–Levinas connection’. My objective is rather to demonstrate, first, the way in which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  2.  59
    The End(s) of Philosophy: Rhetoric, Therapy and Wittgenstein's Pyrrhonism.Bob Plant - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (3):222–257.
  3.  19
    Wittgenstein and Levinas: Ethical and Religious Thought.Bob Plant - 2005 - Routledge.
    _Wittgenstein and Levinas_ examines the oft-neglected relationship between the philosophies of two of the most important and notoriously difficult thinkers of the twentieth century. By bringing the work of each philosopher to bear upon the other, Plant navigates between the antagonistic intellectual traditions that they helped to share. The central focus on the book is the complex yet illuminating interplay between a number of ethical-religious themes in both Wittgenstein's mature thinking and Levinas's distinctive account of ethical responsibility.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  51
    Religion, Relativism, and Wittgenstein’s Naturalism.Bob Plant - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):177 - 209.
    Abstract Wittgenstein?s remarks on religious and magical practices are often thought to harbour troubling fideistic and relativistic views. Unsurprisingly, commentators are generally resistant to the idea that religious belief constitutes a ?language?game? governed by its own peculiar ?rules?, and is thereby insulated from the critical assessment of non?participants. Indeed, on this fideist?relativist reading, it is unclear how mutual understanding between believers and non?believers (even between different sorts of believers) would be possible. In this paper I do three things: (i) show (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  14
    Our Natural Constitution: Wolterstorff on Reid and Wittgenstein.Bob Plant - 2003 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 1 (2):157-170.
  6. Playing Games/Playing Us: Foucault on Sadomasochism.Bob Plant - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (5):531-561.
    The impact of Foucault's work can still be felt across a range of academic disciplines. It is nevertheless important to remember that, for him, theoretical activity was intimately related to the concrete practices of self-transformation; as he acknowledged: `I write in order to change myself.' 1 This avowal is especially pertinent when considering Foucault's work on the relationship between sex and power. For Foucault not only theorized about this topic; he was also actively involved in the S&M subculture of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  20
    The Confessing Animal in Foucault and Wittgenstein.Bob Plant - 2006 - Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (4):533-559.
    In "The History of Sexuality", Foucault maintains that "Western man has become a confessing animal" (1990, 59), thus implying that "man" was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that "man is a ceremonial animal" (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's "genealogy" of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  22
    On the Domain of Metaphilosophy.Bob Plant - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (1-2):3-24.
    This article argues for four interrelated claims: Metaphilosophy is not one sub-discipline of philosophy, nor is it restricted to questions of methodology. Rather, metaphilosophical inquiry encompasses the general background conditions of philosophical practice. These background conditions are of various sorts, not only those routinely considered “philosophical” but also those considered biographical, historical, and sociological. Accordingly, we should be wary of the customary distinction between what is proper and merely contingent to philosophy. “What is philosophy?” is best understood as a practical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  37
    On Being Dead with Derrida.Bob Plant - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (3):320-338.
    If mortality is the most important fact about us, then it is reasonable to think that fear of death is our most fundamental fear. Indeed, while philosophers continue to disagree about whether it is rational to fear death, they tend to assume that fear is the most common, natural response our mortality provokes. I neither want to deny the reality of this fear nor evaluate its rationality. Rather, drawing on Derrida’s remarks on ‘quasi-death’, I will argue that fearful or not, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  24
    Death, Fear, and Self-Mourning.Bob Plant - unknown
    Attitudes to our own mortality are characterized by more than just fear, suggests Bob Plant.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  73
    Absurdity, Incongruity and Laughter.Bob Plant - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (1):111-134.
    In "The Myth of Sisyphus", Camus recommends scornful defiance in the face of our absurd, meaningless existence. Although Nagel agrees that human life possesses an absurd dimension, he objects to Camus' existentialist 'dramatics'. For Nagel, absurdity arises from the irreducible tension between our subjective and objective perspectives on life. In this paper I do two things: (i) critically reconstruct Camus' and Nagel's positions, and (ii) develop Nagel's critique of Camus in order to argue that humour is an appropriate response to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  44
    Philosophical Diversity and Disagreement.Bob Plant - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):567-591.
    Widespread and lasting consensus has not been philosophy's fate. Indeed, one of philosophy's most striking features is its ability to accommodate “not only different answers to philosophical questions” but also “total disagreement on what questions are philosophical” (Rorty 1995, 58). It is therefore hardly surprising that philosophers' responses to this metaphilosophical predicament have been similarly varied. This article considers two recent diagnoses of philosophical diversity: Kornblith and Rescher (respectively) claim that taking philosophical disagreement seriously does not lead to metaphilosophical scepticism. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Christ's Autonomous Hand: Simulations on the Madness of Giving.Bob Plant - 2004 - Modern Theology 20 (4):547-566.
  14.  44
    The Wretchedness of Belief: Wittgenstein on Guilt, Religion, and Recompense.Bob Plant - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):449 - 476.
    In "Culture and Value" Wittgenstein remarks that the truly "religious man" thinks himself to be, not merely "imperfect" or "ill," but wholly "wretched." While such sentiments are of obvious biographical interest, in this paper I show why they are also worthy of serious philosophical attention. Although the influence of Wittgenstein's thinking on the philosophy of religion is often judged negatively (as, for example, leading to quietist and/or fideist-relativist conclusions) I argue that the distinctly ethical conception of religion (specifically Christianity) that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  46
    The Banality of Death.Bob Plant - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (4):571-596.
    Notwithstanding the burgeoning literature on death, philosophers have tended to focus on the significance death has (or ought/ought not to have) for the one who dies. Thus, while the relevance one's own death has for others (and the significance others' deaths have for us) is often mentioned, it is rarely attributed any great importance to the purported real philosophical issues. This is a striking omission, not least because the deaths of others - and the anticipated effects our own death will (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  20
    Perhaps ….Bob Plant - 2006 - Angelaki 11 (3):137-156.
    The formulae "perhaps" and "perhaps not," [] we adopt in place of "perhaps it is and perhaps it is not" []. But here again we do not fight about phrases [] these expressions are indicative of non-assertion. Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism One could spend years on [] the perhaps [] whose modality will render fictional and fragile everything that follows []. One does not testify in court and before the law with "perhaps." Jacques Derrida, Demeure: Fiction and Testimony.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  20
    Wittgenstein, Religious “Passion,” and Fundamentalism.Bob Plant - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (2):280-309.
    Notwithstanding his own spiritual inadequacies, Wittgenstein has a profound respect for those capable of living a genuinely religious life; namely, those whose “passionate,” “loving” faith demands unconditional existential commitment. In contrast, he disapproves of those who see religious belief as hypothetical, reasonable, or dependent on empirical evidence. Drawing primarily on Culture and Value, “Lectures on Religious Belief,” and On Certainty, in this essay I defend two claims: (1) that there is an unresolved tension between Wittgenstein's later descriptive-therapeutic approach and the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  17
    The Wittgenstein Archive.Bob Plant & Peter Baumann - 2006 - Philosophy Now 58:26-27.
    Something in the way of a parody of iconography...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  11
    Resisting Silence In the Face of Evil.Bob Plant - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):27-34.
    In the following paper I shall outline a number of preliminary ideas concerning the relationship between the Holocaust and certain themes which emerge in the work of Emmanuel Levinas. As this relationship is distinctly twofold, my analysis will include both a textual and a rather more speculative component. That is to say, while I shall argue that reading Levinas specifically as a post-Holocaust thinker clarifies a number of his philosophical and rhetorical motifs, so, in turn, does this challenging body of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  9
    Perhaps… Jacques Derrida and Pyrrhonian Scepticism.Bob Plant - 2006 - Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 11 (3):137-156.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  22
    Ethics Without Exit: Levinas and Murdoch.Bob Plant - 2003 - Philosophy and Literature 27 (2):456-470.
  22.  8
    Levinas and the Holocaust: A Reconstruction.Bob Plant - 2014 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 22 (1):44-79.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Gideon Ofrat, The Jewish Derrida Reviewed By.Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (3):181-185.
  24.  14
    Apologies: Levinas and Dialogue.Bob Plant - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):79 – 94.
    In his recent article 'Speech and Sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the Constitution of the Moral Point of View', Steven Hendley argues that Levinas's preoccupation with language as 'exposure' to the 'other' provides an important corrective to Habermas's focus on the 'procedural' aspects of communication. Specifically, what concerns Hendley is the question of moral motivation, and how Levinas, unlike Habermas, responds to this question by stressing the dialogical relation as one of coming 'into proximity to the face of the other' (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  2
    Resisting Silence In the Face of Evil: Re-Thinking the Holocaust, Speaking the Unspeakable, with Emmanuel Levinas.Bob Plant - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):27-34.
    In the following paper I shall outline a number of preliminary ideas concerning the relationship between the Holocaust and certain themes which emerge in the work of Emmanuel Levinas. As this relationship is distinctly twofold, my analysis will include both a textual and a rather more speculative component. That is to say, while I shall argue that reading Levinas specifically as a post-Holocaust thinker clarifies a number of his philosophical and rhetorical motifs, so, in turn, does this challenging body of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Gideon Ofrat, The Jewish Derrida. [REVIEW]Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:181-185.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Jacques Derrida, Who's Afraid of Philosophy? Right to Philosophy.Bob Plant - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (4):247-249.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Jacques Derrida, Who's Afraid of Philosophy? Right to Philosophy 1. [REVIEW]Bob Plant - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23:247-249.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Jill Robbins, Ed., Is It Righteous To Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas Reviewed By.Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (6):442-444.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. On Testimony, Sincerity and Truth.Bob Plant - 2007 - Paragraph 30 (1):30-50.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Richard Rand, Ed., Futures of Jacques Derrida Reviewed By.Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (3):181-185.
  32. Richard Rand, Ed., Futures of Jacques Derrida. [REVIEW]Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:181-185.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Simon Glendinning, Ed., Arguing with Derrida Reviewed By.Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (3):181-185.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Simon Glendinning, Ed., Arguing with Derrida. [REVIEW]Bob Plant - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:181-185.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography