Order:
  1.  70
    Prospective Memory: A New Focus for Research.Peter Graf & Bob Uttl - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):437-450.
    Prospective memory is required for many aspects of everyday cognition, its breakdown may be as debilitating as impairments in retrospective memory, and yet, the former has received relatively little attention by memory researchers. This article outlines a strategy for changing the fortunes of prospective memory, for guiding new research to shore up the claim that prospective memory is a distinct aspect of cognition, and to obtain evidence for clear performance dissociations between prospective memory and other memory functions. We begin by (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  21
    Ceiling Effects Make Hughes and Nicholson’s Data Analyses and Conclusions Inconclusive.Bob Uttl & Alain Morin - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1135-1137.
    Hughes and Nicholson suggest that recognizing oneself is easier from face vs. voice stimuli, that a combined presentation of face and voice actually inhibits self-recognition relative to presentation of face or voice alone, that the left hemisphere is superior in self-recognition to the right hemisphere, and that recognizing self requires more effort than recognizing others. A re-examination of their method, data, and analyses unfortunately shows important ceiling effects that cast doubts on these conclusions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  18
    Pro- and Retrospective Memory in Late Adulthood.Bob Uttl, Peter Graf, JoAnn Miller & Holly Tuokko - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):451-472.
    Everyday tasks, such as getting groceries en route from work, involve two distinct components, one prospective (i.e., remembering the plan) and the other retrospective (i.e., remembering the grocery list). The present investigation examined the size of the age-related performance declines in these components, as well as the relationship between these components and age-related differences in processing resources. The subjects were 133 community-dwelling adults between 65 and 95 years of age. They completed a large battery of tests, including tests of pro- (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark