20 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Brian Ball [19]Brian A. Ball [1]
See also
Brian Ball
Oxford University
  1. Counter Closure and Knowledge Despite Falsehood.Brian Ball & Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (257):552-568.
    Certain puzzling cases have been discussed in the literature recently which appear to support the thought that knowledge can be obtained by way of deduction from a falsehood; moreover, these cases put pressure, prima facie, on the thesis of counter closure for knowledge. We argue that the cases do not involve knowledge from falsehood; despite appearances, the false beliefs in the cases in question are causally, and therefore epistemologically, incidental, and knowledge is achieved despite falsehood. We also show that the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  2.  57
    Deriving the Norm of Assertion.Brian Ball - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:75-85.
    Frank Hindriks has attempted to derive a variant of Timothy Williamson’s knowledge rule for assertion on the basis of a more fundamental belief expression analysis of that speech act. I show that his attempted derivation involves a crucial equivocation between two senses of ‘must,’ and therefore fails. I suggest two possible repairs; but I argue that even if they are successful, we should prefer Williamson’s fully general knowledge rule to Hindriks’s restricted moral norm.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. Indexical Reliabilism and the New Evil Demon.Brian Ball & Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (6):1317-1336.
    Stewart Cohen’s New Evil Demon argument raises familiar and widely discussed concerns for reliabilist accounts of epistemic justification. A now standard response to this argument, initiated by Alvin Goldman and Ernest Sosa, involves distinguishing different notions of justification. Juan Comesaña has recently and prominently claimed that his Indexical Reliabilism (IR) offers a novel solution in this tradition. We argue, however, that Comesaña’s proposal suffers serious difficulties from the perspective of the philosophy of language. More specifically, we show that the two (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  7
    Response to Hindriks and Kooi.Brian Ball - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:93-99.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  73
    Speech Acts: Natural or Normative Kinds? The Case of Assertion.Brian Ball - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (3):336-350.
    There are two views of the essences of speech acts: according to one view, they are natural kinds; according to the other, they are what I call normative kinds—kinds in the (possibly non-reductive) definition of which some normative term occurs. In this article I show that speech acts can be normative but also natural kinds by deriving Williamson's account of assertion, on which it is an act individuated, and constitutively governed, by a norm (the knowledge rule), from a consideration of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. The Tarskian Turn. Edited by Leon Horsten.Brian Ball - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):629-632.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  62
    Semantics, Meta-Semantics, and Ontology: A Critique of the Method of Truth in Metaphysics.Brian A. Ball, Dorothy Edgington & John Hawthorne - unknown
    In this thesis, Semantics, Meta-Semantics, and Ontology, I provide a critique of the method of truth in metaphysics. Davidson has suggested that we can determine the metaphysical nature and structure of reality through semantic investigations. By contrast, I argue that it is not semantics, but meta-semantics, which reveals the metaphysically necessary and sufficient truth conditions of our claims. As a consequence I reject the Quinean criterion of ontological commitment. In Part I, chapter 1, I argue that the metaphysically primary truth (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  42
    The Knowledge Rule and the Action Rule.Brian Ball - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):552-574.
    In this paper I compare Timothy Williamson's knowledge rule of assertion with Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson's action rule. The paper is in two parts. In the first part I present and respond to Maitra and Weatherson's master argument against the knowledge rule. I argue that while its second premise, to the effect that an action X can be the thing to do though one is in no position to know that it is, is true, its first premise is not: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  10
    Alethic Pluralism and the Role of Reference in the Metaphysics of Truth.Brian Ball - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):116-135.
    In this paper, I outline and defend a novel approach to alethic pluralism, the thesis that truth has more than one metaphysical nature: where truth is, in part, explained by reference, it is relational in character and can be regarded as consisting in correspondence; but where instead truth does not depend upon reference it is not relational and involves only coherence. In the process, I articulate a clear sense in which truth may or may not depend upon reference: this involves (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  25
    Forms of Thought, by E. J. Lowe.Brian Ball - 2014 - Mind 123 (492):1205-1208.
  11.  29
    What is Meaning? (Review).Brian Ball - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):485-503.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  19
    What Is Semantic Content?Brian Ball - 2010 - In Erich Rast & Luiz Carlos Baptista (eds.), Meaning and Context. Peter Lang. pp. 2--187.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  9
    On the Normativity of Speech Acts.Brian Ball - 2014 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. De Gruyter. pp. 9-26.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  6
    Critical Notice.Brian Ball - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):575-594.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  11
    The Tarskian Turn. Edited by Leon Horsten. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011. Pp. Xii + 165. Price £24.95.). [REVIEW]Brian Ball - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):629-632.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  3
    Deriving the Norm of Assertion.Brian Ball - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:75-85.
    Frank Hindriks has attempted to derive a variant of Timothy Williamson’s knowledge rule for assertion on the basis of a more fundamental belief expression analysis of that speech act. I show that his attempted derivation involves a crucial equivocation between two senses of ‘must,’ and therefore fails. I suggest two possible repairs; but I argue that even if they are successful, we should prefer Williamson’s fully general knowledge rule to Hindriks’s restricted moral norm.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  1
    Knowledge, Safety, and Questions.Brian Ball - 2016 - Filosofia Unisinos 17 (1):58-62.
    Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could have easily falsely believed such a proposition. Failing to predict that ill-grounded beliefs in such propositions do not constitute knowledge, standard safety theories are therefore less informative than desired. Some have suggested that the subjects at issue could easily have believed some related false proposition; but they have given no indication as to what makes a proposition related. I suggest a solution to this problem: a belief is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Relativism and Monadic Truth. [REVIEW]Brian Ball - 2010 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 13.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Response to Hindriks and Kooi.Brian Ball - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:93-99.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. The Act and Object of Judgment.Brian Ball & Christoph Schuringa (eds.) - forthcoming - Routledge.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark