74 found
Order:
  1. An Architectonic for Science.Wolfgang Balzer, C. Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):349-350.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   180 citations  
  2. An Architectonic for Science; The Structuralist Program.Wolfgang Balzer, C. Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (1):153-155.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  3.  55
    A logical reconstruction of simple equilibrium thermodynamics.C. Ulises Moulines - 1975 - Erkenntnis 9 (1):101-130.
  4. Fundamentos de filosofía de la ciencia.José A. Díez & C. Ulises Moulines - 2008 - Grupo Planeta (GBS).
    Fundamentos de filosofía de la ciencia es una obra de carácter general destinada principalmente a servir de guía a alumnos y profesores en la ensañanza universitaria de esta disciplina, en especial para los estudios de Filosofía, pero también para los de Humanidades y Ciencias Humanas y Naturales. La obra está estructurada en diferentes niveles para facilitar su utilización como libro de texto, tanto en cursos introductorios generales como en seminarios específicos. Aunque el público universitario es su principal destinatario, se ha (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  5.  71
    On theoreticity.Wolfgang Balzer & C. Ulises Moulines - 1980 - Synthese 44 (3):467 - 494.
  6.  35
    Approximate application of empirical theories: A general explication. [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 1976 - Erkenntnis 10 (2):201 - 227.
  7.  91
    Introduction: Structuralism as a program for modelling theoretical science.C. Ulises Moulines - 2002 - Synthese 130 (1):1-11.
  8.  67
    Intertheoretic approximation: the Kepler-Newton case.C. Ulises Moulines - 1980 - Synthese 45 (3):387-412.
  9.  82
    Intertheoretical Relations and the Dynamics of Science.C. Ulises Moulines - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S8):1-15.
    In this paper I propose clearly to distinguish four fundamental types of intertheoretical relations that may be used to represent different types of theoretical change in empirical science. These four types can be represented formally through a refined version of the set-theoretical apparatus of structuralism. They may be described as: crystallization, theory-evolution, embedding, and replacement with partial incommensurability. They will be first explicated in intuitive, informal terms, and some historical examples will be suggested for each type. In the second part (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  10. Structuralist Theory of Science.Wolfgang Balzer & C. Ulises Moulines - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):353-356.
  11.  71
    Theory-nets and the evolution of theories: The example of Newtonian mechanics.C. Ulises Moulines - 1979 - Synthese 41 (3):417 - 439.
  12.  79
    Making sense of Carnap's “aufbau”.C. Ulises Moulines - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):263 - 286.
  13. Ontology, reduction, emergence: A general frame.C. Ulises Moulines - 2006 - Synthese 151 (3):313-323.
    In a scientific context, ontological commitments should be considered as supervenient over accepted scientific theories. This implies that the primarily ontological notions of reduction and emergence of entities of different kinds should be reformulated in terms of relations between existing empirical theories. For this, in turn, it is most convenient to employ a model-theoretic view of scientific theories: the identity criterion of a scientific theory is essentially given by a class of models. Accordingly, reduction and emergence are to be seen (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  14.  30
    Cuantificadores existenciales y principios-guía en las teorías físicas.C. Ulises Moulines - 1978 - Critica 10 (29):59-88.
  15.  57
    The crystallization of Clausius's phenomenological thermodynamics.C. Ulises Moulines - 2010 - In Andreas Hüttemann & Gerhard Ernst (eds.), Time, Chance, and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 139.
  16.  26
    Esbozo de ontoepistemosemántica.C. Ulises Moulines - 1998 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 13 (1):141-159.
    En este trabajo sc presenta un marco general en el que desarrollar una “ontoepistemo-semántica” para las teodas científicas y sus terminos característicos. En primer lugar, se defiende la esencialidad de los aspectos ontologicos y epistemológicos para la semantica y se hacen explícitos los principios generales que constituyen dicho marco. A continuación, se aplican estos principios al análisis ontoepistemosemántico de cada uno de los tres tipos principales de términos científicos: términos relacionales y funcionales con contenido empírico, términos matemáticos puros y términos (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  17. La Philosophie des sciences. L'invention d'une discipline.C. Ulises Moulines - 2006 - Critica 38 (114):107-120.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  18.  28
    Ls there genulnely sclentlflc progress?C. Ulises Moulines - 2000 - In Adam Jonkisz & Leon Koj (eds.), On Comparing and Evaluating Scientific Theories. Rodopi. pp. 72--173.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  19.  63
    Por qué no soy materialista.C. Ulises Moulines - 1977 - Critica 9 (26):25-37.
  20. Principios-guía y leyes especiales.José Díez & C. Ulises Moulines - 2019 - Perspectivas 3 (2):22-54.
    La finalidad de este trabajo es revisar una de las nociones centrales de la metateoría estructuralista, la noción de principio-guía, mostrar su fecundidad para abordar algunas cuestiones centrales tanto de filosofía general como de filosofía especial de la ciencia, así como de historia de la filosofía de la ciencia, y, por último, revisar y valorar algunas propuestas de elucidación de la misma. La conclusión es que se trata de una noción tan fructífera como difícil de analizar.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  61
    Esbozo de ontoepistemosemántica (sketch of ontoepistemosemantics).C. Ulises Moulines - 1998 - Theoria 13 (1):141-159.
    En este trabajo sc presenta un marco general en el que desarrollar una “ontoepistemo-semántica” para las teodas científicas y sus terminos característicos. En primer lugar, se defiende la esencialidad de los aspectos ontologicos y epistemológicos para la semantica y se hacen explícitos los principios generales que constituyen dicho marco. A continuación, se aplican estos principios al análisis ontoepistemosemántico de cada uno de los tres tipos principales de términos científicos: términos relacionales y funcionales con contenido empírico, términos matemáticos puros y términos (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  22.  8
    Zur Typologie wissenschaftlicher Entwicklung nach strukturalistischer Deutung.C. Ulises Moulines - 1997 - In Christoph Hubig (ed.), Cognitio Humana - Dynamik des Wissens Und der Werte: Xvii. Deutscher Kongreß Für Philosophie Leipzig 23.–27. September 1996, Kongreßband: Vorträge Und Kolloquien. De Gruyter. pp. 397-410.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23.  36
    On how the distinction between history and philosophy of science should not be drawn.C. Ulises Moulines - 1983 - Erkenntnis 19 (1-3):285 - 296.
  24.  31
    The ways of holism.C. Ulises Moulines - 1986 - Noûs 20 (3):313-330.
  25.  45
    Theoretical terms and bridge principles: A critique of Hempel's (self-)criticisms. [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 1985 - Erkenntnis 22 (1-3):97 - 117.
  26.  39
    Die mathematisierung der erfahrung: Vorgänger zu carnaps “aufbau”. [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (1):105-120.
    At present, there is a renewed interest in thoseaspects of Rudolf Carnap ''s LogischerAufbau der Welt that cannot just be reduced tothe tradition of logical positivism. There is, however,one of these aspects which seems to have beenneglected by the historical analyses of theAufbau''s background: what may be called aprogram for the mathematization of sense experience,as developed by Carnap in the most difficult partof his work, Chapter IV/A. It is the program of applying settheory and topology to the reconstruction of phenomenal (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  27.  31
    Wer bestimmt, was es gibt? Zum Verhältnis zwischen Ontologie und Wissenschaftstheorie.C. Ulises Moulines - 1994 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 48 (2):175 - 191.
  28.  14
    Bridges, Constraints, and Links1.C. Ulises Moulines & Marek Polanski - 1996 - In Wolfgang Balzer & Carlos Ulises Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6--219.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29.  10
    Un concepto estructural de aproximación empírica.C. Ulises Moulines - 1976 - Critica 8 (24):25-51.
  30. Review of S. Nuccetelli et al. Blackwell Companion to Latin American Philosophy. [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 2010 - Metascience (19):457-460.
    This volume contains the most extensive exposition of Latin American philosophy to date. I know of no other comparable anthology on the subject in any language. The width of its scope is quite impressive. At least for this reason, and whatever its shortcomings might be (to some of them I’ll come to speak below), it is a welcome collective work.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  60
    Bibliography of Structuralism III.Cláudio Abreu, Pablo Lorenzano & C. Ulises Moulines - 2013 - Metatheoria – Revista de Filosofía E Historia de la Ciencia 3:1--36.
    In two occasions a Bibliography of Structuralism has been published in Erkenntnis (1989, 1994). Since then a lot of water has flowed under the bridge and the structuralist program has shown a continuous development. The aim of the present bibliography is to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the publication of An Architectonic for Science –structuralism’s main reference work– and of its recent translation into Spanish by updating the previous bibliographies with titles which have appeared since 1994 as well as before (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Ontology, Reduction, and the Unity of Science.C. Ulises Moulines - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:19-27.
    Ontology should be conceived as supervenient on scientific theories. They tell us what categories of things there really are. Thus, we would have a unique system of ontology if we would attain the unity of science through a reductionist program. For this, it should be clear how a relation of intertheoretical reduction (with ontological implications) is to be conceived. A formal proposal is laid out in this paper. This allows us also to define the notion of a fundamental theory. Now, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33. Extractos de una correspondencia.C. Ulises Moulines - 1989 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 24 (53):123.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. Joseph D. Sneed, "The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics". [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 1975 - Erkenntnis 9:423.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. La concepción estructural de las ciencias como forma de holismo.C. Ulises Moulines - 1992 - Agora 11 (1):9.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  36.  8
    Towards a Typology of Intertheoretical Relations.C. Ulises Moulines - 1992 - In Javier Echeverria, Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (eds.), The Space of Mathematics: Philosophical, Epistemological, and Historical Explorations. De Gruyter. pp. 403--411.
  37.  57
    ¿Hay Una filosofía de la ciencia en el último Wittgenstein?C. Ulises Moulines - 1989 - Theoria 4 (2):327-342.
  38. Cómo narrar el desarrollo de la filosofía de la ciencia en el siglo XX. Respuesta a Alejandro Cassini.C. Ulises Moulines - 2013 - Critica 45 (134):99-107.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  10
    Guiding Principles and Special Laws†.José A. Díez & C. Ulises Moulines - 2022 - Theoria 88 (4):782-798.
    Theoria, Volume 88, Issue 4, Page 782-798, August 2022.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  10
    La concepción estructuralista de la ciencia.C. Ulises Moulines - 2002 - Revista de filosofía (Chile) 58:69-77.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  46
    Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen. [REVIEW]C. Ulises Moulines - 1982 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 18 (1):183-189.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Desarrollo científico y verdad.C. Ulises Moulines - 1992 - Agora 11 (1):179.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Javier Esquivel, filósofo socrático.C. Ulises Moulines - 1993 - Dianoia 39 (39):203.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Leônidas hegenberg, "etapas da investigação científica".C. Ulises Moulines - 1976 - Critica 8 (24):123.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. The Emergence of a Research Programme in Classical Thermodynamics in Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change.C. Ulises Moulines - 1989 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 111:111-121.
  46. Zur Typologie intendierter Anwendungsformen im Allgemeinen.C. Ulises Moulines - 1991 - Ethik Und Sozialwissenschaften 2 (1):143.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  23
    Tipología axiomática de las teorías empíricas.C. Ulises Moulines - 1985 - Critica 17 (51):41-69.
  48.  1
    A natureza e a estrutura das teorias científicas.C. Ulises Moulines - 2019 - Perspectivas 3 (2):295-312.
    Na filosofia da ciência duas questões tornam-se centrais na discussão da natureza da ciência empírica: 1) o que é uma teoria (científica)? Ou seja, como é construída, como funciona? E, 2) como é que uma teoria se relaciona com sua base experiencial correspondente? Para lidar com estas duas questões, a moderna filosofia da ciência concebeu vários “modelos” (metateóricos) sobre a natureza e o funcionamento das teorias científicas. Alguns aspectos desses modelos são amplamente aceitos pela comunidade de filósofos da ciência, mas (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  30
    What is characteristic of Latin American philosophy?: Susana Nuccetelli, Ofelia Schutte, and Otávio Bueno : A companion to Latin American philosophy. Malden, MA, etc.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. XIV + 555 pp, £100.00 HB.C. Ulises Moulines - 2010 - Metascience 19 (3):457-460.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  33
    Realismos E instrumentalismos: Respuesta a Zamora Bonilla.C. Ulises Moulines - 1995 - Theoria 10 (2):217-224.
1 — 50 / 74