Results for 'C. W. Van Boekel'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  26
    C. W. Van Boekel: Katharsis. Een filologische Reconstructie van de Psychologie van Aristoteles omtrent het Gevoelsleven. Pp. viii+270. Utrecht: De Fontein, 1957. Paper. [REVIEW]D. W. Lucas - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (02):172-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  8
    De Novis Libris Iudicia.W. Den Boer, A. Hoekstra, J. C. Kamerbeek, J. C. Opstelten, G. J. De Vries, C. W. Van Boekel, J. T. H. M. F. Pieters, B. A. Van Groningen, C. J. De Vogel, W. K. Kraak, K. Sprey, E. J. Jonkers, J. H. Croon, M. F. A. Brok & R. E. H. Westendorp Boerma - 1960 - Mnemosyne 13 (1):63-93.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  6
    Judging Athenian Dramatic Competitions.C. W. Marshall & Stephanie van Willigenburg - 2004 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 124:90-107.
    This paper presents a new model for how the voting worked at the Athenian dramatic competitions, and demonstrates its viability mathematically. Previous proposals have either failed to take full account of the ancient sources or have not considered all the possible permutations of judging results. As is generally recognized, ten votes were cast, but in most circumstances not all were counted. Sections I-IV consider the tragic competition at the Dionysia, in which three competitors vied for the prize. For the questions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  54
    The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.
    This paper attempts to systematically characterize critical reactions in argumentative discourse, such as objections, critical questions, rebuttals, refutations, counterarguments, and fallacy charges, in order to contribute to the dialogical approach to argumentation. We shall make use of four parameters to characterize distinct types of critical reaction. First, a critical reaction has a focus, for example on the standpoint, or on another part of an argument. Second, critical reactions appeal to some kind of norm, argumentative or other. Third, they each have (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  5.  70
    About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):27-58.
    We shall investigate the similarities and dissimilarities between old and new dialectic. For the ‘old dialectic’, we base our survey mainly on Aristotle’s Topics and Sophistical Refutations, whereas for the ‘new dialectic’, we turn to contemporary views on dialogical interaction, such as can, for the greater part, be found in Walton’s The New Dialectic. Three issues are taken up: types of dialogue, fallacies, and strategies. Though one should not belittle the differences in scope and outlook that obtain between the old (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  6.  31
    In the Quagmire of Quibbles: A Dialectical Exploration.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3459-3476.
    Criticism may degenerate into quibbling or nitpicking. How can discussants keep quibblers under control? In the paper we investigate cases in which a battle about words replaces a discussion of the matters that are actually at issue as well as cases in which a battle about minor objections replaces a discussion of the major issues. We survey some lines of discussion dealing with these situations in profiles of dialogue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  17
    That’s No Argument! The Dialectic of Non-Argumentation.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1173-1197.
    What if in discussion the critic refuses to recognize an emotionally expressed argument of her interlocutor as an argument, accusing him of having presented no argument at all. In this paper, we shall deal with this reproach, which taken literally amounts to a charge of having committed a fallacy of non-argumentation. As such it is a very strong, if not the ultimate, criticism, which even carries the risk of abandonment of the discussion and can, therefore, not be made without burdening (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  27
    Assessment of Physician-Assisted Death by Members of the Public Prosecution in The Netherlands.J. M. Cuperus-Bosma, G. van der Wal, C. W. Looman & P. J. van der Maas - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (1):8-15.
    OBJECTIVES: To identify the factors that influence the assessment of reported cases of physician-assisted death by members of the public prosecution. DESIGN/SETTING: At the beginning of 1996, during verbal interviews, 12 short case-descriptions were presented to a representative group of 47 members of the public prosecution in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Assessment varied considerably between respondents. Some respondents made more "lenient" assessments than others. Characteristics of the respondents, such as function, personal-life philosophy and age, were not related to the assessment. Case (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  9.  2
    To Leave or Not to Leave? A Multi-Sample Study on Individual, Job-Related, and Organizational Antecedents of Employability and Retirement Intentions.Pascale M. Le Blanc, Maria C. W. Peeters, Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden & Llewellyn E. van Zyl - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  5
    Be Reasonable!Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (2):226-244.
    Are we living in an age of unreason? And what to do about it? Can we combat unreason? We discuss situations in which one may presume to be confronted with unreasonable behavior by an interlocutor: fallacies, changing rules of the game, shifting to some other type of dialogue, and abandonment of reasonable dialogue. We recommend ways that could be helpful to obtain a return to reason. These possibilities lead us to a moderately optimistic conclusion.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Encyclopaedisch Handboek van het Moderne Denken. Derde geheel herziene druk.W. Banning, C. Van der Klaauw, H. Kramers, H. Pos, K. Proost & J. Ubbink - 1951 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 13 (3):563-564.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Encyclopaedisch Handboek van het Moderne Denken.W. Banning, C. J. van der Klaauw, H. A. Kramers, H. J. Pos, K. F. Proost & J. B. Ubbink - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:127-128.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  61
    Incapacity to Give Informed Consent Owing to Mental Disorder.C. W. Van Staden - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):41-43.
    What renders some mentally disordered patients incapable of informed consent to medical interventions? It is argued that a patient is incapable of giving informed consent owing to mental disorder, if a mental disorder prevents a patient from understanding what s/he consents to; if a mental disorder prevents a patient from choosing decisively; if a mental disorder prevents a patient from communicating his/her consent; or if a mental disorder prevents a patient from accepting the need for a medical intervention. This paper (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  14.  10
    An Algebraic Look at Filtrations in Modal Logic.W. Conradie, W. Morton & C. J. van Alten - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (5):788-811.
  15.  34
    The Influence of Synesthesia on Eye Movements: No Synesthetic Pop-Out in an Oculomotor Target Selection Task.Tanja C. W. Nijboer, Gabriela Satris & Stefan Van der Stigchel - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1193-1200.
    Recent research on grapheme-colour synesthesia has focused on whether visual attention is necessary to induce a synesthetic percept. The current study investigated the influence of synesthesia on overt visual attention during an oculomotor target selection task. Chromatic and achromatic stimuli were presented with one target among distractors among multiple ‘5’s ). Participants executed an eye movement to the target. Synesthetes and controls showed a comparable target selection performance across conditions and a ‘pop-out effect’ was only seen in the chromatic condition. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  21
    Th. C. W. Oudemans, De verdeelde mens. Ontwerp van een filosofische anthropologie, 1980. Boom Meppel/Amsterdam, p.p. 285. [REVIEW]G. Glas - 1984 - Philosophia Reformata 49 (2):170-176.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  46
    Are Emotional Expressions Intentional?: A Self-Organizational Approach.R. W. Gibbs Jr & G. C. Van Orden - 2003 - Consciousness and Emotion 4 (1):1-16.
    This paper discusses the debate over whether emotional expressions are spontaneous or intentional actions. We describe a variety of empirical evidence supporting these two possibilities. But we argue that the spontaneous-intentional distinction fails to explain the psychological dynamics of emotional expressions. We claim that a complex systems perspective on intentions, as self-organized critical states, may yield a unified view of emotional expressions as a consequence of situated action. This account simultaneously acknowledges the embodied status of environment, evolution, culture and mind (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  21
    Boekbesprekingen.W. Beuken, Jacques van Ruiten, P. C. Beentjes, Elly Beurskens, F. Droës, Wim Weren, M. J. J. Menken, Martin Parmentier, M. Parmentier, G. Rouwhorst, Marc Schneiders, M. Schrama, Hans Goddijn, M. B. Pranger, Ber Leurink, Otger Steggink, Eugène Honée, Johan G. Hahn, R. G. W. Huysmans, C. Traets & J. Hahn - 1988 - Bijdragen 49 (1):90-110.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  21
    Boekbesprekingen.W. Beuken, Jacques van Ruiten, Bart-Jan Koet, Th C. de Kruijf, J. Wissink, Ben Vedder, J. Y. H. Jacobs, W. G. Tillmans, R. G. W. Huysmans, Th Bell, H. Bleijendaal, Guido Zingari, Paul van Tongeren, H. P. M. Goddijn, Jules Loyson, G. Verwey & M. V. D. Berk - 1981 - Bijdragen 42 (2):203-229.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  5
    Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2019 - Informal Logic 39 (3):205-227.
    When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  12
    Burger, C W, Miiller, B A & Smit D J 1997 - Riglyne vir prediking oor die eenheid van kerk.H. J. Botes - 1999 - Hts Theological Studies 55 (2/3).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  29
    Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”.David Godden - unknown
    Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  23.  14
    De Novis Libris Iudicia.W. Vollgraff, G. Van Hoorn, B. A. Van Groningen, J. C. Kamerbeek, C. J. De Vogel, G. J. De Vries, W. J. W. Koster, J. H. Croon, J. H. Thiel, C. C. Van Essen, A. D. Leeman, R. E. H. Westendorp Boerma, M. F. A. Brok, A. Sizoo, A. W. Byvanck & D. Holwerda - 1957 - Mnemosyne 10 (2):158-190.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  28
    Assistance in Dying for Older People Without a Serious Medical Condition Who Have a Wish to Die: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.Natasja J. H. Raijmakers, Agnes van der Heide, Pauline S. C. Kouwenhoven, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel, Johannes J. M. van Delden & Judith A. C. Rietjens - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (2):145-150.
  25.  36
    Factors Determining the Motivation of Primary Health Care Professionals to Implement and Continue the 'Beweegkuur' Lifestyle Intervention Programme.Judith H. M. Helmink, Stef P. J. Kremers, Leonieke C. van Boekel, Femke N. van Brussel-Visser & Nanne K. de Vries - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):682-688.
  26.  10
    The Burden of Criticism.Jan van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.
    Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convinc-ingly. Other critical reactions convey some or even all of the considerations that make the critic critical of the arguer’s position and direct the arguer to defuse or to at least contend with them. First, an explication of the notion of a critical reaction will be provided, zooming in on the degree of ‘directiveness’ that a critical reaction displays. Second, it will be examined whether (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  27.  14
    Grieksche Ceramiek. By C. W. Lunsingh Scheurleer. Pp. 208; 56 plates. Rotterdam: Nijgh and van Ditmar, 1936.B. L. W. T. - 1937 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 57 (1):91-92.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  17
    Key Factors in Children’s Competence to Consent to Clinical Research.Irma M. Hein, Pieter W. Troost, Robert Lindeboom, Marc A. Benninga, C. M. Zwaan, Johannes B. Van Goudoever & Ramón J. L. Lindauer - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):74.
    Although law is established on a strong presumption that persons younger than a certain age are not competent to consent, statutory age limits for asking children’s consent to clinical research differ widely internationally. From a clinical perspective, competence is assumed to involve many factors including the developmental stage, the influence of parents and peers, and life experience. We examined potential determining factors for children’s competence to consent to clinical research and to what extent they explain the variation in competence judgments.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  29.  13
    A Dynamic Network Model to Explain the Development of Excellent Human Performance.Ruud J. R. Den Hartigh, Marijn W. G. Van Dijk, Henderien W. Steenbeek & Paul L. C. Van Geert - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30.  20
    Cross-Modal, Bidirectional Priming in Grapheme-Color Synesthesia.Chris L. E. Paffen, Maarten J. Van der Smagt & Tanja C. W. Nijboer - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:325-333.
  31.  13
    Examining Fallacies in Diagnostic Reasoning.C. W. van Staden - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):528-530.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  30
    Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1):91-111.
    The paper focuses on conflicts about an already negotiated compromise, taking as its example a debate in Dutch parliament about the approval of the Paris Agreement on climate change of 2015. It deals with a variety of worries that opponents of approval may advance and the arguments in its defense thus invited. It concludes with a profile of dialogue providing reasonable options for those involved in such a conflict.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  27
    The Risk-Benefit Task of Research Ethics Committees: An Evaluation of Current Approaches and the Need to Incorporate Decision Studies Methods. [REVIEW]Johannes J. M. Van Delden Rosemarie D. L. C. Bernabe, Ghislaine J. M. W. Van Thiel, Jan A. M. Raaijmakers - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):6.
    BackgroundResearch ethics committees (RECs) are tasked to assess the risks and the benefits of a trial. Currently, two procedure-level approaches are predominant, the Net Risk Test and the Component Analysis.DiscussionBy looking at decision studies, we see that both procedure-level approaches conflate the various risk-benefit tasks, i.e., risk-benefit assessment, risk-benefit evaluation, risk treatment, and decision making. This conflation makes the RECs’ risk-benefit task confusing, if not impossible. We further realize that RECs are not meant to do all the risk-benefit tasks; instead, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34.  16
    Looking Into the Crystal Ball of Our Emotional Lives: Emotion Regulation and the Overestimation of Future Guilt and Shame.Wilco W. van Dijk, Lotte F. van Dillen, Mark Rotteveel & Elise C. Seip - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (3).
  35.  26
    What Do International Ethics Guidelines Say in Terms of the Scope of Medical Research Ethics?Rosemarie D. L. C. Bernabe, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-18.
    BackgroundIn research ethics, the most basic question would always be, “which is an ethical issue, which is not?” Interestingly, depending on which ethics guideline we consult, we may have various answers to this question. Though we already have several international ethics guidelines for biomedical research involving human participants, ironically, we do not have a harmonized document which tells us what these various guidelines say and shows us the areas of consensus. In this manuscript, we attempted to do just that.MethodsWe extracted (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  19
    The Role of Argument in Negotiation.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):549-567.
    The purpose of this paper is to show the pervasive, though often implicit, role of arguments in negotiation dialogue. This holds even for negotiations that start from a difference of interest such as mere bargaining through offers and counteroffers. But it certainly holds for negotiations that try to settle a difference of opinion on policy issues. It will be demonstrated how a series of offers and counteroffers in a negotiation dialogue contains a reconstructible series of implicit persuasion dialogues. The paper (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  37.  19
    Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):329-350.
    Negotiation is not only used to settle differences of interest but also to settle differences of opinion. Discussants who are unable to resolve their difference about the objective worth of a policy or action proposal may be willing to abandon their attempts to convince the other and search instead for a compromise that would, for each of them, though only a second choice yet be preferable to a lasting conflict. Our questions are: First, when is it sensible to enter into (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  38.  32
    RELIGION IN GAUL W. Van Andringa: La Religion En Gaule Romaine. Piété Et Politique (Ier–IIIe Siècle Apr. J.-C.) . Pp. 336, Maps, Ills. Paris: Editions Errance, 2002. Paper, €29. ISBN: 2-87772-228-. [REVIEW]J. Rufus Fears - 2004 - The Classical Review 54 (02):519-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  8
    E. W. Von Tschirnhaus and the Ars Inveniendi.C. A. Van Peursen - 1993 - Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (3):395.
  40.  21
    Recognising the Forest, but Not the Trees: An Effect of Colour on Scene Perception and Recognition.Tanja C. W. Nijboer, Ryota Kanai, Edward H. F. de Haan & Maarten J. van der Smagt - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):741-752.
    Colour has been shown to facilitate the recognition of scene images, but only when these images contain natural scenes, for which colour is ‘diagnostic’. Here we investigate whether colour can also facilitate memory for scene images, and whether this would hold for natural scenes in particular. In the first experiment participants first studied a set of colour and greyscale natural and man-made scene images. Next, the same images were presented, randomly mixed with a different set. Participants were asked to indicate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  21
    Novel Insights Into the Rehabilitation of Memory Post Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Lauriane A. Spreij, Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily, Caroline M. van Heugten & Tanja C. W. Nijboer - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  42.  30
    The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.
    Some critical reactions hardly give clues to the arguer as to how to respond to them convincingly. Other critical reactions convey some or even all of the considerations that make the critic critical of the arguer’s position and direct the arguer to defuse or to at least contend with them. First, an explication of the notion of a critical reaction will be provided, zooming in on the degree of “directiveness” that a critical reaction displays. Second, it will be examined whether (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  43.  17
    Attitude, Knowledge and Behaviour Towards Evidence‐Based Medicine of Physical Therapists, Students, Teachers and Supervisors in the Netherlands: A Survey.Gwendolijne G. M. Scholten-Peeters, Monique S. Beekman-Evers, Annemiek C. J. W. van Boxel, Sjanna van Hemert, Winifred D. Paulis, Johannes C. van der Wouden & Arianne P. Verhagen - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):598-606.
  44. Linguistic Markers of Recovery: Theoretical Underpinnings of First Person Pronoun Usage and Semantic Positions of Patients.C. W. van Staden - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (2):105-121.
  45.  16
    Language Mirrors Relational Positions in Recovery: A Response to Commentaries by Falzer and Davidson, Gillett, and Suppes.C. W. van Staden - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (2):137-140.
    THE FIRST PART OF MY RESPONSE to the commentaries on my earlier paper is about the place of language and logical systems in the understanding of the personal positions that recovering patients occupy in their life experiences. It includes the main reasons for using Frege's philosophy. Thereafter, I make the point that relational positions in recovery extend broader than positions of actor and patient.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  15
    Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):315-347.
    Contemporary theory of argumentation offers many insights about the ways in which, in the context of a public controversy, arguers should ideally present their arguments and criticize those of their opponents. We also know that in practice not all works out according to the ideal patterns: numerous kinds of derailments are an object of study for argumentation theorists. But how about the use of unfairstrategiesvis-à-vis one’s opponents? What if it is not a matter of occasional derailments but of one party’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  47.  3
    Socio-Emotional Concern Dynamics in a Model of Real-Time Dyadic Interaction: Parent-Child Play in Autism.Casper Hesp, Henderien W. Steenbeek & Paul L. C. van Geert - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  20
    Het voordeel van de twijfel. Sextus Empiricus' scepticisme uitgelegd aan postmodernen.C. W. Maris - 1998 - Nexus 20:164-182.
    Het antieke sceptische oeuvre van Sextus Empiricus werd in de tijd van het humanisme herontdekt en verder ontwikkeld. De Engelse denken Hume nam de draad op in de achttiende eeuw en sindsdien is het scepticisme in het Europese denken een rol blijven spelen. Wittgenstein heeft dit rationalistisch scepticisme van richting doen veranderen en het de weg van postmoderne pluraliteit opgedreven.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  9
    Rudolf Bultmann Se Verstaan van Vryheid.I. W. C. Van Wyk - 2015 - Hts Theological Studies 71 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  50.  10
    Bonaventura en Thomas Van aquino: 1274–1974.C. W. Mönnich - 1974 - Bijdragen 35 (1):2-16.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000