5 found
See also:
Profile: Carolyn Dicey Jennings (University of California Merced)
  1.  28
    Carolyn Suchy-Dicey (2012). Inductive Parsimony and the Methodological Argument. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):605-609.
    Studies on so-called Change Blindness and Inattentional Blindness have been taken to establish the claim that conscious perception of a stimulus requires the attentional processing of that stimulus. One might contend, against this claim, that the evidence only shows attention to be necessary for the subject to have access to the contents of conscious perception and not for conscious perception itself. This “Methodological Argument” is gaining ground among philosophers who work on attention and consciousness, such as Christopher Mole. I find (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  59
    Carolyn Suchy-Dicey (2009). It Takes Two: Ethical Dualism in the Vegetative State. Neuroethics 2 (3):125-136.
    To aid neuroscientists in determining the ethical limits of their work and its applications, neuroethical problems need to be identified, catalogued, and analyzed from the standpoint of an ethical framework. Many hospitals have already established either autonomy or welfare-centered theories as their adopted ethical framework. Unfortunately, the choice of an ethical framework resists resolution: each of these two moral theories claims priority at the exclusion of the other, but for patients with neurological pathologies, concerns about the patient’s welfare are treated (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  27
    Carolyn Suchy-Dicey (2007). Playing Nice and Teaching Good. Philosophy Now 63:6-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4. Carolyn Suchy-Dicey (2010). Thomas Metzinger, The Ego Tunnel. [REVIEW] Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (5-6):228-232.
  5.  13
    Carolyn Suchy-Dicey (2012). Properly Pragmatic: A Response to Corns and Campbell. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):615-616.