31 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Catherine Hundleby [23]Catherine E. Hundleby [8]
See also
Catherine Elisabeth Hundleby
University of Windsor
  1.  31
    The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation.Moira Howes & Catherine Hundleby - 2018 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 5 (2):229-254.
    While anger can derail argumentation, it can also help arguers and audiences to reason together in argumentation. Anger can provide information about premises, biases, goals, discussants, and depth of disagreement that people might otherwise fail to recognize or prematurely dismiss. Anger can also enhance the salience of certain premises and underscore the importance of related inferences. For these reasons, we claim that anger can serve as an epistemic resource in argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity of this connection. Arguing also seems to some to identify a central method of philosophical reasoning, and gendered assumptions and standards would pose problems for the discipline. Can feminine modes of reasoning provide an alternative or supplement? Can overarching epistemological standards account for the benefits of different approaches to arguing? These are some of the prospects for argumentation inside and outside of philosophy that feminists consider. -/- (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  18
    Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries.Catherine Hundleby - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):238-262.
    Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept to a necessary minimum. On her ac-count, politeness can limit the ancillary adversariality of hostile culture but a degree of logical opposition will remain part of argumentation, and perhaps all reasoning. Argumentation cannot be purified by politeness in the way she hopes, nor does reasoning even in the discursive context of argumentation demand opposition. Such hopes assume an idealized politeness free from gender, and reasoners with (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4.  46
    The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation.Catherine Hundleby - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):279-308.
    Popular textbook treatments of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation employ the Adversary Method identified by Janice Moulton (1983) that takes the goal of argumentation to be the defeat of other arguments and that narrows the terms of discourse in order to facilitate such defeat. My analysis of the textbooks shows that the Adversary Method operates as a Kuhnian paradigm in philosophy, and demonstrates that the popular fallacies pedagogy is authoritarian in being unresponsive to the scholarly developments in informal logic (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. Just Reason.Catherine Hundleby & Phyllis A. Rooney - 2010 - Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):1-6.
  6.  35
    Introduction: Reasoning for Change.Phyllis Rooney & Catherine E. Hundleby - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3).
    This special issue of Informal Logic brings together two important areas of philosophy that have shown significant development in the last three decades: informal logic and feminist philosophy. A significant innovation they both share is new thinking about practices of argumentation and related practices of reasoning. Feminist theorizing supporting social and political change foregrounds “reasoning for change” in a way that draws attention to the contextual and rhetorical dimensions of argument and thus connects with significant developments in informal logic.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  13
    Fallacy Forward: Situating Fallacy Theory.Catherine E. Hundleby - unknown
    I will situate the fallacies approach to reasoning with the aim of making it more relevant to contemporary life and thus intellectually significant and valuable as a method for teaching reasoning. This entails a revision that will relegate some of the traditional fallacies to the realm of history and introduce more recently recognized problems in reasoning. Some newly recognized problems that demand attention are revealed by contemporary science studies, which reveal at least two tenacious problems in reasoning that I will (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. The Epistemological Evaluation of Oppositional Secrets.Catherine Hundleby - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (4):44-58.
    : Although political values guide people who take advice from standpoint epistemologies in deciding whether to reveal secrets used to resist oppression, these decisions can also be understood and evaluated in purely cognitive or epistemological terms. When political considerations direct us to preserve a secret, the cognitive value progressively diminishes because the view of the world projected by the secret is increasingly vulnerable.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  7
    The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation.Moira Howes & Catherine Hundleby - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.
    Moira Howes and Catherine Hundleby ABSTRACT: While anger can derail argumentation, it can also help arguers and audiences to reason together in argumentation. Anger can provide information about premises, biases, goals, discussants, and depth of disagreement that people might otherwise fail to recognize or prematurely dismiss. Anger can also enhance the salience of certain premises...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  31
    The Open End: Social Naturalism, Feminist Values and the Integrity of Epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (3):251 – 265.
  11.  78
    Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies Sharyn Clough Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, Viii + 166 Pp., $65.00, $24.95 Paper. [REVIEW]Catherine Hundleby - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (4):782.
  12.  49
    Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies.Catherine Hundleby - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (4):782-784.
  13.  60
    Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. By Rae Langton.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (1):224-227.
  14.  18
    The Epistemological Evaluation of Oppositional Secrets.Catherine Hundleby - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (4):44-58.
    Although political values guide people who take advice from standpoint epistemologies in deciding whether to reveal secrets used to resist oppression, these decisions can also be understood and evaluated in purely cognitive or epistemological terms. When political considerations direct us to preserve a secret, the cognitive value progressively diminishes because the view of the world projected by the secret is increasingly vulnerable.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  42
    Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Human (Review).Catherine Hundleby - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 233-237.
  16.  13
    Authority Arguments in Academic Contexts in Social Studies and Humanities.Begona Carrascal & Catherine E. Hundleby - unknown
    In academic contexts the appeal to authority is a quite common but seldom tested argument, either because we accept the authority without questioning it, or because we look for alternative experts or reasons to support a different point of view. But, by putting ourselves side by side an already accepted authority, we often rhetorically manoeuvre to displace the burden of the proof to avoid the fear to present our opinions and to allow face saving.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  13
    The Need for Rhetorical Listening to Ground Scientific Objectivity.Catherine E. Hundleby - unknown
    Recent work in feminist and postcolonial rhetoric demonstrates various meanings of silence. Listening rhetorically in order to comprehend silences is particularly difficult in scientific contexts, I argue, because the common ground for scientific discourse assumes a culture of disclosure. Rhetorical listening is also important to science because listening accounts for silence as well as disclosure, and so maximizes the diversity in recognized perspectives that provides scientific objectivity.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism Reviewed By.Catherine Hundleby - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (6):404-407.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  6
    Harding Then and Now.Catherine Hundleby - 2017 - Metascience 26 (2):307-310.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  9
    Feminist Empiricism.Catherine Hundleby - unknown
  21.  16
    Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Humanby Barbara Herrnstein Smith.Catherine Hundleby - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (4):233-237.
  22.  7
    Androcentrism as a Fallacy of Argumentation.Catherine Hundleby & Claudio Duran - unknown
    The deep operation of androcentrism in scientific argumentation demands recognition as a form of fallacy. On Walton’s account, fallacies are serious mistakes in argumentation that employ presumptions acceptable in other circumstances. There are only isolated cases in which androcentric pre-sumptions are acceptable, and I argue that androcentrism affects an overarching theme of generalization in science rather than an isolated scheme. Androcentrism is related to other ways of treating privileged people as exemplary humans, whose negative impact on processes of argumentation can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Nancy CM Hartsock, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays Reviewed By.Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (4):261-263.
  24.  4
    No Title Available: Dialogue.Catherine Hundleby - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (4):782-784.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  3
    The Epistemological Evaluation of Oppositional Secrets.Catherine Hundleby - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (4):44-58.
  26.  3
    Commentary on Kloster.Catherine E. Hundleby - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  1
    Silence and the Limitations of Contextual Objectivity.Catherine Hundleby - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
    In this dissertation I argue that naturalist epistemology would benefit if it were recognized to include feminist standpoint theory, a theory of knowledge that is based on the feminist critiques of science. Naturalists such as W. O. Quine argue that normative epistemology can be developed on the basis of science. However, they have mostly rested content with descriptions of how knowledge seems to work. Naturalists need to evaluate our epistemic practices against competing alternatives if they are to justify our knowledge (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism. [REVIEW]Catherine Hundleby - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23:404-407.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Nancy C.M. Hartsock, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. [REVIEW]Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21:261-263.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Reasonable Responses: The Thought of Trudy Govier.Catherine E. Hundleby (ed.) - 2017
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark