9 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Catherine Wearing (Wellesley College)
  1. Metaphor and What is Said.Catherine Wearing - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (3):310–332.
    In this paper, I argue for an account of metaphorical content as what is said when a speaker utters a metaphor. First, I show that two other possibilities—the Gricean account of metaphor as implicature and the strictly semantic account developed by Josef Stern—face several serious problems. In their place, I propose an account that takes metaphorical content to cross-cut the semantic-pragmatic distinction. This requires re-thinking the notion of metaphorical content, as well as the relation between the metaphorical and the literal.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Metaphor, Idiom, and Pretense.Catherine Wearing - 2012 - Noûs 46 (3):499-524.
    Imaginative and creative capacities seem to be at the heart of both games of make-believe and figurative uses of language. But how exactly might cases of metaphor or idiom involve make-believe? In this paper, I argue against the pretense-based accounts of Walton (1990, 1993), Hills (1997), and Egan (this journal, 2008) that pretense plays no role in the interpretation of metaphor or idiom; instead, more general capacities for manipulating concepts (which are also called on within the use of pretense) do (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Autism, Metaphor and Relevance Theory.Catherine Wearing - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (2):196-216.
    The pattern of impairments exhibited by some individuals on the autism spectrum appears to challenge the relevance-theoretic account of metaphor ( Carston, 1996, 2002 ; Sperber and Wilson, 2002 ; Sperber and Wilson, 2008 ). A subset of people on the autism spectrum have near-normal syntactic, phonological, and semantic abilities while having severe difficulties with the interpretation of metaphor, irony, conversational implicature, and other pragmatic phenomena. However, Relevance Theory treats metaphor as importantly unlike phenomena such as conversational implicature or irony (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  8
    Null Complements: Licensed by Syntax or by Semantics-Pragmatics?Corinne Iten, Marie-Odile Junker, Aryn Pyke, Robert Stainton & Catherine Wearing - unknown
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  21
    Metaphor and Hyperbole: Testing the Continuity Hypothesis.Paula Rubio-Fernández, Catherine Wearing & Robyn Carston - 2015 - Metaphor and Symbol 30 (1):24-40.
    In standard Relevance Theory, hyperbole and metaphor are categorized together as loose uses of language, on a continuum with approximations, category extensions and other cases of loosening/broadening of meaning. Specifically, it is claimed that there are no interesting differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses. In recent work, we have set out to provide a more fine-grained articulation of the similarities and differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses and their relation to literal uses. We have defended the view that hyperbolic use (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  25
    Review of Samuel Guttenplan, Objects of Metaphor[REVIEW]Catherine Wearing - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  20
    Review of Insensitive Semantics, by Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore. [REVIEW]Robert J. Stainton & Catherine Wearing - 2006 - Journal of Linguistics 42 (1):187-190.
  8.  13
    The Semantics and Syntax of Null Complements.Robert J. Stainton, Marile-Odile Junker & Catherine Wearing - unknown
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Semantics and Pragmatics in the Interpretation of Metaphor.Catherine Wearing - 2002 - Dissertation, Harvard University
    This dissertation examines how the distinction between what is said and what is implicated should be applied to metaphorical language. I claim that metaphor has been incorrectly held to belong to the domain of pragmatics---what is implicated by an utterance---and I argue that metaphorical interpretations can and should be regarded as constituting what is said. ;The first two chapters develop the case against two implicature accounts of metaphor: Grice's account of metaphor as conversational implicature, and the relevance-theoretic account of metaphor (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography