10 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Charles Creegan [8]Charles L. Creegan [6]
  1.  30
    Either/Or, I (International Kierkegaard Commentary, 3).Charles L. Creegan - 1997 - Teaching Philosophy 20 (2):199-204.
  2. Daniel A. Dombrowski, Analytic Theism, Hartshorne, and the Concept of God Reviewed By.Charles L. Creegan - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17 (6):402-404.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  35
    Wittgenstein and Kierkegaard: Religion, Individuality, and Philosophical Method.Charles L. Creegan - 1989 - Routledge.
  4. Gertrude D. Conway, Wittgenstein on Foundations Reviewed By.Charles Creegan - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (2):82-84.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  11
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Eliot Deutsch, R. J. Ray, Thomas C. Anderson, Charles Creegan & Donald Wayne Viney - 1992 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 32 (2):117-128.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  11
    Kierkegaard: Eithers and Ors.Charles Creegan - unknown
    At first glance, a systematic examination of Either/Or apparently yields a clear analysis of its structure. The project is straightforward. There are two words in the title. There are two volumes, each with its principal speaker. In the course of the work a speaker for the ethical perspective follows an aesthetic speaker and comments critically on him and his ideas. As a judge, he clearly has the requisite temporal authority and moral ascendancy to do so. Moreover the judge appeals to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Mark C. E. Peterson, Abrahim H. Khan, Charles Creegan, Matthew J. Mancini, Delno C. West & Daniel A. Dombrowski - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  5
    Kierkegaard's Relations.Charles L. Creegan - unknown
    There are intriguing congruities between Kierkegaard and some recent tendencies in feminism and post-modern thought.1 Neither Kierkegaard, feminists, nor post-modernism are systematic (that's one congruity right there!), so the common points can't be neatly tabulated. But (again typically of all the parties concerned) they tend to lie in three areas: methodology, communicative strategy, and the rejection of procrustean metaphysics. In what follows I will try to assemble some fragments which point out these congruities.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    H:09 816 9415 M:021 044 4640.Charles Creegan - unknown
    • To obtain a position where I can apply my analytical and writing skills in a team environment. The key value I have to offer is end-to-end integration of information gathering, analyzing systems and requirements, and producing written output in an appropriate format to meet the organization’s needs.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Words of Love.Charles Creegan - unknown
    Kierkegaard has consistently been a key figure in discussions of the relation between Christian and secular worldviews. The particular question of the Christian worldview is one of the central facets of his "project," which already presupposes the existence (in Denmark!) of two different ways of seeing the world, "Christianity" and "Christendom.".
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography