13 found
Order:
  1.  22
    A Place for Figures of Speech in Argumentation Theory.Christian Plantin - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):325-337.
    This paper deals with the treatment of figures of speech in Perelman’s and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Treatise on Argumentation (TA), and, more broadly, with the place of figures in argumentation theory. The contrast between two conceptions (or two domains)\n of rhetoric, “a rhetoric of figures” and “a rhetoric of argument” can be traced back to Ramus, and it has been revived in\n the seventies through the perception of an incommensurability between Perelman’s “New Rhetoric” and the École de Liège’s “General\n Rhetoric”. Modern theories (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Ralph H. Johnson, Christian Plantin & Charles A. Willard - 1996 - Routledge.
    Argumentation theory is a distinctly multidisciplinary field of inquiry. It draws its data, assumptions, and methods from disciplines as disparate as formal logic and discourse analysis, linguistics and forensic science, philosophy and psychology, political science and education, sociology and law, and rhetoric and artificial intelligence. This presents the growing group of interested scholars and students with a problem of access, since it is even for those active in the field not common to have acquired a familiarity with relevant aspects of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  27
    Persuasion or Alignment?Christian Plantin - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):83-97.
    Persuasion is a fact of social life, one upon which positive and negative views can be taken. Argumentative rhetoric is often functionally defined as aiming to persuade. Different views on persuasion are taken in argumentative studies, and many other disciplines focus on persuasion. This article takes an “inter-discursive” view of argumentation, and, following the “Hamblin’s trend”, suggests a possible replacement for the concept of persuasion by the inter-discursive concept of alignment.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  22
    Schmetz, Roland (2000). L'argumentation selon Perelman. Pour une raison au cœur de la rhétorique.Christian Plantin - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (1):127-130.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  12
    Group Emotions in Collective Reasoning: A Model.Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund & Gerald Niccolai - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):301-329.
    Education and cognition research today generally recognize the tri-dimensional nature of reasoning processes as involving cognitive, social and emotional phenomena. However, there is so far no theoretical framework articulating these three dimensions from a descriptive perspective. This paper aims at presenting a first model of how group emotions work in collective reasoning, and specifies their social and cognitive functions. This model is inspired both from a multidisciplinary literature review and our extensive previous empirical work on an international corpus of videotaped (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  5
    Emotional Positioning as a Cognitive Resource for Arguing.Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund & Gerald Peter Niccolai - 2017 - Pragmatics and Society 8 (3):323-354.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Estrategia Argumentativa.Christian Plantin - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 237--238.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  11
    Laissez dire: La norme du discours de l'un est dans le discours de l'autre Christian Plantin (Lyon).Christian Plantin - forthcoming - Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  9
    J. Anthony Blair: Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Introduction by Christopher W. Tindale. [REVIEW]Christian Plantin - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (3):379-388.
    The book presents a selection of paper authored by J. Anthony Blair, one of the most important personalities in the field of argumentation studies, “a frontline worker or pioneer”,, and, I’d like to add, a stylist. The book cover 30 years of research, from 1981 to 2011. Twenty papers are grouped under four thematic sections, “Critical Thinking”, “Informal Logic”, “Argumentation Theory”, and “Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric”. Each section is preceded by an “Introduction” giving its main orientation, and followed by a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Valor Argumentativo.Christian Plantin - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 630--632.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  9
    Dominicy, Marc & Frédéric, Madeleine (2001). La mise en scène des valeurs–la rhétorique de l'éloge et du blâme.Christian Plantin - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):351-354.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  6
    L'argument du paralogisme.Christian Plantin - 1995 - Hermes 15:245.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. La argumentación entre enunciación e interacción [Introducción].Christian plaNtiN - 1998 - Escritos: Revista del Centro de Ciencias del Lenguaje 18:7-21.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark