The people we call Europeans include many millions of European Union citizens, the Swiss, the Ukrainians, the Turks, the Norwegians, the Croatians, the Serbs, and the Albanians. Do they share memories and a common sense of history? Indeed, should Europeans share memories? Each of the European nations has accumulated a stockpile of tales and myths that allow its citizens to act in solidarity within set boundaries. What, then, does that imply for a united Europe? In what way do Europeans have (...) a "shared memory" We must display the anchor points of supra- and transnational memory as concentric circles: The first circle: the holocaust as a negative founding myth. The second circle: Soviet-communism-equally criminal? The third circle: expulsions as a pan-European Trauma? The fourth circle: the Armenian question- Unanswered? The fifth circle: the European periphery The sixth circle: Europe as a continent of Immigration. The seventh circle: Europe's success story after 1945. (shrink)

This is no election-year manifesto for those who vacillate between right and left to try to usurp the liberal terrain lying between Englehard and Bonn, Hoppe and Schiller, who present themselves under venerable — indeed, already worn-out—labels. What concerns us is a middle-class radicalism stemming from a respectable democratic tradition. In the not-too-distant future this traditional “radicalism” will be in the majority. We are not concerned with the Greens and other colored Alternatives, so long as they keep claiming that new (...) social movements must depend on some fareastern or western school of irrationalism, or that they must be an escape from politics or a “new experiment.” Our concern is the potential “Red-Green” majority. (shrink)

The call for transparency is one of the main slogans of the political present. While Anita Möllering, following the agenda of the “Piraten-Partei”, mostly addresses the demand for transparency to political actors and relates it to democratic procedures, Claus Leggewie discusses the downsides of this fundamentally democratic demand. From this point of view, the central conflict concerns the fixation of the “Piraten-Partei” on a transparent state, while the users of social media hardly reflect on the intransparency of its private commercial (...) operators in a critical way. (shrink)

Die Forderung nach Transparenz gehört zu den zentralen Schlagworten der politischen Gegenwart. Während Anita Möllering die Transparenz-Forderung im Sinne der Piraten-Partei aber vor allem an die politischen Akteure adressiert und auf demokratische Verfahren bezieht, diskutiert Claus Leggewie insbesondere die Kehrseiten dieser basisdemokratischen Forderung. Zentraler Widerspruch ist aus dieser Perspektive die Fixierung der Piraten-Partei auf den gläsernen Staat, während sich die Benutzer sozialer Medien der Intransparenz ihrer privat-kommerziellen Betreiber kaum kritisch stellen. German The call for transparency is one of the main (...) slogans of the political present. While Anita Möllering, following the agenda of the “Piraten-Partei”, mostly addresses the demand for transparency to political actors and relates it to democratic procedures, Claus Leggewie discusses the downsides of this fundamentally democratic demand. From this point of view, the central conflict concerns the fixation of the “Piraten-Partei” on a transparent state, while the users of social media hardly reflect on the intransparency of its private commercial operators in a critical way. (shrink)