Results for 'Cornelia Niekus Moore'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. A Dialogue on G. E. Moore's Ethical Philosophy, Together with an Account of Three Talks with G. E. Moore on Diverse Philosophical Questions. [REVIEW]Constantine Cavarnos & G. E. Moore - 1979
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Henry Moore on Sculpture a Collection of the Sculptor's Writings and Spoken Words.Henry Moore & Philip Brutton James - 1992
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sul Linguaggio Organico di Henry Moore = on the Organic Language of Henry Moore.Henry Moore & Roberto Sanesi - 1978 - La Nuova Foglio.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. The Collected Writings of Addison W. Moore.Addison Webster Moore & John R. Shook - 2003
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. G.E. Moore: Selected Writings.G. E. Moore - 1993 - Routledge.
    G.E. Moore, more than either Bertrand Russell or Ludwig Wittgenstein, was chiefly responsible for the rise of the analytic method in twentieth-century philosophy. This selection of his writings shows Moore at his very best. The classic essays are crucial to major philosophical debates that still resonate today. Amongst those included are: * A Defense of Common Sense * Certainty * Sense-Data * External and Internal Relations * Hume's Theory Explained * Is Existence a Predicate? * Proof of an (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  6. A Discussion Between Wittgenstein and Moore on Certainty : From the Notes of Norman Malcolm.Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. Moore, Norman Malcolm & Gabriel Citron - 2015 - Mind 124 (493):73-84.
    In April 1939, G. E. Moore read a paper to the Cambridge University Moral Science Club entitled ‘Certainty’. In it, amongst other things, Moore made the claims that: the phrase ‘it is certain’ could be used with sense-experience-statements, such as ‘I have a pain’, to make statements such as ‘It is certain that I have a pain’; and that sense-experience-statements can be said to be certain in the same sense as some material-thing-statements can be — namely in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  40
    Moore's Truths About Causation and Responsibility: A Reply to Alexander and Ferzan. [REVIEW]Michael S. Moore - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):445-462.
    In this response to the review of Moore, Causation and Responsibility, by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan, previously published in this journal, two issues are discussed. The first is whether causation, counterfactual dependence, moral blame, and culpability, are all scalar properties or relations, that is, matters of more-or-less rather than either-or. The second issue discussed is whether deontological moral obligation is best described as a prohibition against using another as a means, or rather, as a prohibition on an agent (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore.Ludwig Wittgenstein, John Maynard Keynes, G. E. Moore & Bertrand Russell - 1974
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  9.  14
    Choice, Character, and Excuse*: MICHAEL S. MOORE.Michael S. Moore - 1990 - Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (2):29-58.
    Freud justified his extensive theorizing about dreams by the observation that they were “the royal road” to something much more general: namely, our unconscious mental life. The current preoccupation with the theory of excuse in criminal law scholarship can be given a similar justification, for the excuses are the royal road to theories of responsibility generally. The thought is that if we understand why we excuse in certain situations but not others, we will have also gained a much more general (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  10
    Utility and Humanity: The Quest for the Honestum in Cicero, Hutcheson, and Hume: James Moore.James Moore - 2002 - Utilitas 14 (3):365-386.
    Hume considered An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals incomparably the best of all his writings. In the argument advanced here, I propose that Hume's preference for the Enquiry may be linked to his admiration of Cicero, and his work, De Officiis. Cicero's attempt to discover the honestum of morality in De Officiis had a particular relevance and appeal for philosophers of the early eighteenth century who were seeking to establish what they called the foundation of morality. One of those (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  12
    I—A. W. Moore.A. W. Moore - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169-193.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  79
    G. E. Moore.G. E. Moore - 1959 - Mind 68 (269):1-1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  19
    On Saying and Showing: A. W. Moore.A. W. Moore - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (242):473-497.
    There is not, and may there never be, any treatise by me …onthese things, for the subject is not communicable in words, as othersciences are. Rather is it that, after long association in the business itself and a shared life, a light is lit in the soul, kindled, as it were, by a leaping flame, and thenceforward feeds itself.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  11
    The Destruction of the World Trade Center and the Law on Event-Identity: Michael S. Moore.Michael S. Moore - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:259-342.
    September 11, 2001 brought to legal awareness an issue that has long puzzled metaphysicians. The general issue is that of event-identity, drawing the boundaries of events so that we can tell when there is one event and when there are two. The September 11th version of that issue is: how many occurrences of insured events were there on September 11, 2001 in New York? Was the collapse of the two World Trade Center Towers one event, despite the two separate airliners (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  11
    What Are These Familiar Words Doing Here?: A. W. Moore.A. W. Moore - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51:147-171.
    My title is a quotation from Davidson's essay ‘On Saying That’. And although my concerns are at some remove from his, they do connect at one significant point. We find ourselves under the continual pressure of theory to deny that ordinary familiar semantic features of ordinary familiar words equip them to serve certain ordinary familiar functions. One of Davidson's aims is to resist that pressure as far as the function of reporting indirect speech is concerned. In similar vein I want (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  11
    Causation and Responsibility*: MICHAEL S. MOORE.Michael S. Moore - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):1-51.
    In various areas of Anglo-American law, legal liability turns on causation. In torts and contracts, we are each liable only for those harms we have caused by the actions that breach our legal duties. Such doctrines explicitly make causation an element of liability. In criminal law, sometimes the causal element for liability is equally explicit, as when a statute makes punishable any act that has “ caused … abuse to the child….” More often, the causal element in criminal liability is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  10
    Kinach/Moore Bibliography.Barbara M. Kinach & Carol A. Moore - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (2):13-13.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  9
    Common Principles, Different Histories: Understanding Religious Liberty in the United States and France: R. Laurence Moore.R. Laurence Moore - 2010 - Modern Intellectual History 7 (2):459-478.
    In her book Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality the American philosopher Martha Nussbaum joins a chorus of American intellectuals who have criticized France and other European nations for their failure to embrace the concept of cultural pluralism. In Nussbaum's opinion, the meaning that the French attach to egalité has remained stuck in circumstances peculiar to the eighteenth century. The concept is outdated and has not in the contemporary world been able to protect cultural diversity (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  24
    In What Follows, We Shall Bring Out as Clearly as Possible These Points of Similarities That Moore's Thinking on Goodness Have with Phenomenological Thinking on Values.S. Moore - 2001 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 28:N0 - 2.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  12
    A Comment on D. J. Moore and D. A. Shiek's 'Toward a Theory of Early Infantile Autism.'.Rober A. Webb & Dewey J. Moore - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (3):278-279.
  21. Moore's Margin Notes on Reid.G. E. Moore - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  7
    The Utilitarian Ethics of R. B. Brandt1: Andrew Moore.Andrew Moore - 1993 - Utilitas 5 (2):301-310.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  14
    Kinach/Moore Bibliography (From Page 7).Barbara M. Kinach & Carol A. Moore - 1991 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):13-13.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Dante the Philosopher Tr. By David Moore. --.Etienne Gilson & David Moore - 1949 - Sheed & Ward.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Face to Face: The Photography of Lloyd E. Moore.Lloyd E. Moore - 2012 - Ohio University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. G.E. Moore: The Early Essays.G. E. Moore - 1986 - Temple University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Powerful Days: Civil Rights Photography Charles Moore.Charles Moore, Andrew Young & Michael Durham - 2005 - University Alabama Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Some Fundamental Aspects of the Logic of Mysticism B. Litt. Thesis Submitted by G.E. Moore.G. E. Moore - 1971 - [S.N.].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Il Problema Dei Valori l'Etica di G.E. Moore.Giulio Preti & G. E. Moore - 1986 - F. Angeli.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. A Source Book in Indian Philosophy Edited by Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore.S. Radhakrishnan & Charles Alexander Moore - 1960 - Princeton University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. The Critical Spirit Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse. Edited by Kurt H. Wolff and Barrington Moore. With the Assistance of Heinz Lubasz, Maurice R. Stein and E.V. Walter. --. [REVIEW]Kurt H. Wolff, Barrington Moore & Herbert Marcuse - 1967 - Beacon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. »Obschon das Schwächste Werkzeug«. Die Darstellung der Frau im deutschen Pietismus.Cornelia Niekus Moore - 2005 - In Udo Sträter (ed.), Interdisziplinäre Pietismusforschungen: Beiträge Zum Ersten Internationalen Kongress Für Pietismusforschung 2001. De Gruyter. pp. 37-54.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Desiring to Desire: Russell, Lewis and G.E.Moore.Charles Pigden - 2007 - In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes from G.E.Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 244-260.
    I have two aims in this paper. In §§2-4 I contend that Moore has two arguments (not one) for the view that that ‘good’ denotes a non-natural property not to be identified with the naturalistic properties of science and common sense (or, for that matter, the more exotic properties posited by metaphysicians and theologians). The first argument, the Barren Tautology Argument (or the BTA), is derived, via Sidgwick, from a long tradition of anti-naturalist polemic. But the second argument, the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Moore's Paradoxes, Evans's Principle and Self-Knowledge.John N. Williams - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):348-353.
    I supply an argument for Evans's principle that whatever justifies me in believing that p also justifies me in believing that I believe that p. I show how this principle helps explain how I come to know my own beliefs in a way that normally makes me the best authority on them. Then I show how the principle helps to solve Moore's paradoxes.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  35. Confirmation, Transitivity, and Moore: The Screening-Off Approach.William Roche & Tomoji Shogenji - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (3):1-21.
    It is well known that the probabilistic relation of confirmation is not transitive in that even if E confirms H1 and H1 confirms H2, E may not confirm H2. In this paper we distinguish four senses of confirmation and examine additional conditions under which confirmation in different senses becomes transitive. We conduct this examination both in the general case where H1 confirms H2 and in the special case where H1 also logically entails H2. Based on these analyses, we argue that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  36. Expressivism and Moore's Paradox.Jack Woods - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14:1-12.
    Expressivists explain the expression relation which obtains between sincere moral assertion and the conative or affective attitude thereby expressed by appeal to the relation which obtains between sincere assertion and belief. In fact, they often explicitly take the relation between moral assertion and their favored conative or affective attitude to be exactly the same as the relation between assertion and the belief thereby expressed. If this is correct, then we can use the identity of the expression relation in the two (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37. Moore's Paradox and Epistemic Norms.Clayton Littlejohn - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):79 – 100.
    We shall evaluate two strategies for motivating the view that knowledge is the norm of belief. The first draws on observations concerning belief's aim and the parallels between belief and assertion. The second appeals to observations concerning Moore's Paradox. Neither of these strategies gives us good reason to accept the knowledge account. The considerations offered in support of this account motivate only the weaker account on which truth is the fundamental norm of belief.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  38. Moore's Paradox and the Structure of Conscious Belief.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (1):99-121.
    Propositions such as are paradoxical, in that even though they can be true, they cannot be truly asserted or believed. This is Moore’s paradox. Sydney Shoemaker has recently ar- gued that the paradox arises from a constitutive relation that holds between first- and second-order beliefs. This paper explores this approach to the paradox. Although Shoemaker’s own account of the paradox is rejected, a different account along similar lines is endorsed. At the core of the endorsed account is the claim (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  39.  20
    A Commitment-Theoretic Account of Moore's Paradox.Jack Woods - forthcoming - In An Atlas of Meaning: Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface).
    Moore’s paradox, the infamous felt bizarreness of sincerely uttering something of the form “I believe grass is green, but it ain’t”—has attracted a lot of attention since its original discovery (Moore 1942). It is often taken to be a paradox of belief—in the sense that the locus of the inconsistency is the beliefs of someone who so sincerely utters. This claim has been labeled as the priority thesis: If you have an explanation of why a putative content could (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. The Dogmatist, Moore's Proof and Transmission Failure.Luca Moretti - 2014 - Analysis 74 (3):382-389.
    According to Jim Pryor’s dogmatism, if you have an experience as if P, you acquire immediate prima facie justification for believing P. Pryor contends that dogmatism validates Moore’s infamous proof of a material world. Against Pryor, I argue that if dogmatism is true, Moore’s proof turns out to be non-transmissive of justification according to one of the senses of non-transmissivity defined by Crispin Wright. This type of non-transmissivity doesn’t deprive dogmatism of its apparent antisceptical bite.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  71
    Moore's Paradox and Akratic Belief.Eugene Chislenko - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):n/a-n/a.
    G.E. Moore noticed the oddity of statements like: “It's raining, but I don't believe it.” This oddity is often seen as analogous to the oddity of believing akratically, or believing what one believes one should not believe, and has been appealed to in denying the possibility of akratic belief. I describe a Belief Akratic's Paradox, analogous to Moore's paradox and centered on sentences such as: “I believe it's raining, but I shouldn't believe it.” I then defend the possibility (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  42.  47
    Moore's Paradox and the Priority of Belief Thesis.John N. Williams - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1117-1138.
    Moore’s paradox is the fact that assertions or beliefs such asBangkok is the capital of Thailand but I do not believe that Bangkok is the capital of Thailand or Bangkok is the capital of Thailand but I believe that Bangkok is not the capital of Thailand are ‘absurd’ yet possibly true. The current orthodoxy is that an explanation of the absurdity should first start with belief, on the assumption that once the absurdity in belief has been explained then this (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  43. Scanlon Versus Moore on Goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
  44. On the Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Propositional Content: Anti-Psychologism in Nineteenth-Century Psychology and G.E. Moore’s Early Theory of Judgment.Consuelo Preti - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):176-185.
    I argue that the familiar picture of the rise of analytic philosophy through the early work of G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell is incomplete and to some degree erroneous. Archival evidence suggests that a considerable influence on Moore, especially evident in his 1899 paper ‘The nature of judgment,’ comes from the literature in nineteenth-century empirical psychology rather than nineteenth-century neo-Hegelianism, as is widely believed. I argue that the conceptual influences of Moore’s paper are more likely to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. Belief and Self‐Knowledge: Lessons From Moore's Paradox.Declan Smithies - 2016 - Philosophical Issues 26 (1):393-421.
    The aim of this paper is to argue that what I call the simple theory of introspection can be extended to account for our introspective knowledge of what we believe as well as what we consciously experience. In section one, I present the simple theory of introspection and motivate the extension from experience to belief. In section two, I argue that extending the simple theory provides a solution to Moore’s paradox by explaining why believing Moorean conjunctions always involves some (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. 'Mill, Moore, and Intrinsic Value'.Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32.
    In this paper, I examine how philosophers before and after G. E. Moore understood intrinsic value. The main idea I wish to bring out and defend is that Moore was insufficiently attentive to how distinctive his conception of intrinsic value was, as compared with those of the writers he discussed, and that such inattentiveness skewed his understanding of the positions of others that he discussed and dismissed. My way into this issue is by examining the charge of inconsistency (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  94
    Moore's Paradox, Defective Interpretation, Justified Belief and Conscious Belief.John N. Williams - 2010 - Theoria 76 (3):221-248.
    In this journal, Hamid Vahid argues against three families of explanation of Moore-paradoxicality. The first is the Wittgensteinian approach; I assert that p just in case I assert that I believe that p. So making a Moore-paradoxical assertion involves contradictory assertions. The second is the epistemic approach, one committed to: if I am justified in believing that p then I am justified in believing that I believe that p. So it is impossible to have a justified omissive (...)-paradoxical belief. The third is the conscious belief approach, being committed to: if I consciously believe that p then I believe that I believe that p. So if I have a conscious omissive Moore-paradoxical belief, then I have contradictory second-order beliefs. In their place, Vahid argues for the defective-interpretation approach, broadly that charity requires us to discount the utterer of a Moore-paradoxical sentence as a speaker. I agree that the Wittgensteinian approach is unsatisfactory. But so is the defective-interpretation approach. However, there is a satisfactory version of each of the epistemic and conscious-belief approaches. (shrink)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  48.  59
    Moore's Paradox in Belief and Desire.John N. Williams - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (1):1-23.
    Is there a Moore ’s paradox in desire? I give a normative explanation of the epistemic irrationality, and hence absurdity, of Moorean belief that builds on Green and Williams’ normative account of absurdity. This explains why Moorean beliefs are normally irrational and thus absurd, while some Moorean beliefs are absurd without being irrational. Then I defend constructing a Moorean desire as the syntactic counterpart of a Moorean belief and distinguish it from a ‘Frankfurt’ conjunction of desires. Next I discuss (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  49.  59
    Moore's Paradox in Thought: A Critical Survey.John N. Williams - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):24-37.
    It is raining but you don’t believe that it is raining. Imagine silently accepting this claim. Then you believe both that it is raining and that you don’t believe that it is raining. This would be an ‘absurd’ thing to believe,yet what you believe might be true. Itmight be raining, while at the same time, you are completely ignorant of the state of the weather. But how can it be absurd of you to believe something about yourself that might be (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50. How to Read Moore's "Proof of an External World".Kevin Morris & Consuelo Preti - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4 (1).
    We develop a reading of Moore’s “Proof of an External World” that emphasizes the connections between this paper and Moore’s earlier concerns and strategies. Our reading has the benefit of explaining why the claims that Moore advances in “Proof of an External World” would have been of interest to him, and avoids attributing to him arguments that are either trivial or wildly unsuccessful. Part of the evidence for our view comes from unpublished drafts which, we believe, contain (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000