30 found
Order:
  1.  12
    Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy.D. C. Innes - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):165-.
    Augustan poets refer curiously often to the possible composition of a Gigantomachy, as in Prop. 2.1 and 3.9, Ov. Am. 2.1.11 ff., Trist. 2.61 ff. and 331 ff., and the future study of natural philosophy, as in Verg. Georg. 2.475 ff. and Prop. 3.5.25 ff. These ambitions are rejected, abandoned, or firmly set in the future. I suggest that the function of both is closely similar since they provide traditionally sublime themes to contrast the poet's present ‘humbler’’ task.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  31
    Aristotle's Rhetoric.D. C. Innes - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (02):151-.
  3.  31
    Ancient Rhetoric.D. C. Innes - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (01):66-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  24
    Cicero, Ad Atticum i. 14. 4.D. C. Innes - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (02):145-146.
  5.  32
    Gorgias, Antiphon and Sophistopolis.D. C. Innes - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (2):221-231.
  6.  14
    Kωλoeiδhσ.D. C. Innes - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (01):240-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  28
    Menander Rhetor.D. C. Innes - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (01):23-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  13
    Phidias and Cicero, Brutus 70.D. C. Innes - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (02):470-.
    Phidias’ absence from the survey of sculptors in Cic. Brut. 70 is curious, explanation in terms of differing histories of sculpture only partly convincing. I suggest that Cicero has valid literary motives and is wittily undermining the Atticist position by adaptation of what was a rhetorical topos, the parallel development of Greek prose and sculpture from archaic spareness to classical expertise and dignity: see Dem. Eloc. 14, D. H. Isoc. 3, p.59 U-R; more elaborate but partly deriving from Cicero and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  3
    Phidias and Cicero, Brutus 70.D. C. Innes - 1978 - Classical Quarterly 28 (2):470-471.
    Phidias’ absence from the survey of sculptors in Cic. Brut. 70 is curious, explanation in terms of differing histories of sculpture only partly convincing. I suggest that Cicero has valid literary motives and is wittily undermining the Atticist position by adaptation of what was a rhetorical topos, the parallel development of Greek prose and sculpture from archaic spareness to classical expertise and dignity: see Dem. Eloc. 14, D. H. Isoc. 3, p.59 U-R; more elaborate but partly deriving from Cicero and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  15
    Quo Usque Tandem Patiemini?D. C. Innes - 1977 - Classical Quarterly 27 (02):468-.
    In his article , 97–105) R. Reneham rightly classes Sail. Cat.20.9 as a conscious imitation of Cic.Cat.1.1, but adopts the unsatisfactory explanation of parody. Such parody is, as he notes, without parallel in Sallust and ineptly distracts attention from the vigorous development of Catiline's rhetoric. Elsewhere mimesis is regularly a compliment to the author imitated, often closely functional by reinforcing a point from the parallel of a similar context . Similarly I suggest that here Sallust recalls Cicero's words to illustrate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  25
    S. A. Kosma: Κεφάλαια ἀπὸ τὴν χρήση το ἐπιθέτου στὸν Πίνδαρο. Pp. xx+175. Thessalonica: privately printed, 1970. Paper.D. C. Innes - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (01):84-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  25
    Tiberius on Figures of Speech.D. C. Innes - 1971 - The Classical Review 21 (03):368-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  32
    Aristotle's Rhetoric - Bernd Schneider: Die mittelalterlichen griechisch-lateinischen Übersetzungen der aristotelischen Rhetorik. Pp. xiii+203. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971. Cloth, DM. 68. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (2):151-153.
  14.  29
    Ancient Rhetoric J. Martin: Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Methode. (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, II.3.) Pp. xi + 420. Munich: Beck, 1974. Cloth, DM. 118. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (01):66-68.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  36
    Detlev Fehling: Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias. Pp. xii+358. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1969. Cloth, DM.78. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (03):418-.
  16.  13
    Detlev Fehling: Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias. Pp. xii+358. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1969. Cloth, DM.78. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (3):418-418.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  23
    Giuseppe Brocgia: Tradizione ed esegesi: studi su Esiodo e sulla lirica greca arcaica. Pp. 151. Brescia: Paideia, 1969. Paper, L.2,500. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (03):404-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  13
    Giuseppe Brocgia: Tradizione ed esegesi: studi su Esiodo e sulla lirica greca arcaica. Pp. 151. Brescia: Paideia, 1969. Paper, L.2,500. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (3):404-404.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  27
    Menander Rhetor J. Soffel: Die Regeln Menanders für die Leichenrede. (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, 57.) Pp. 295. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain, 1974. Cloth, DM. 42. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (01):23-24.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  29
    On Style Dirk Marie Schenkeveld: Studies in Demetrius 'On Style'. (Amsterdamdiss.) Pp. 186. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1964. Cloth, fl. 28. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (03):315-317.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  30
    W. Stroh: Taxis und Taktik, Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Pp. 318. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1975. Cloth, £9.75. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (01):121-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  9
    W. Stroh: Taxis und Taktik, Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Pp. 318. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1975. Cloth, £9.75. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (1):121-121.
  23.  4
    Accentual Responsion in Greek Strophic Poetry. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (1):94-94.
  24.  8
    Aristote, Rhétorique, Tome troisième. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (1):107-108.
  25.  18
    Denys d'Halicarnasse, Opuscules rhétoriques. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1981 - The Classical Review 31 (1):111-112.
  26.  7
    Figures of Speech in Pindar. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (3):323-324.
  27.  4
    Sight and Sound in Bacchylides. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1972 - The Classical Review 22 (1):15-16.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  5
    Towards a Text of Aristole's Rhetoric. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1976 - The Classical Review 26 (2):172-173.
  29.  8
    Tiberius on Figures of Speech. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1971 - The Classical Review 21 (3):368-370.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  14
    Zur Ideenlehre des Hermogenes. [REVIEW]D. C. Innes - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (1):120-121.