Results for 'Dancy On Buck—Passing'

998 found
Order:
  1.  16
    Dancy on Buck Passing.Philip Stratton-Lake - 2013 - In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford University Press.
    I defend the buck-passing account of value from Dancy's critique.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  10
    Dancy on Buck Passing.Philip Stratton-Lake - unknown
    I defend the buck-passing account of value from Dancy's critique.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  49
    Should We Pass the Buck?Jonathan Dancy - 2005 - In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Springer. pp. 33--44.
  4.  6
    Why Pass Every Buck? On Skorupski's Buck‐Passing Account of Normativity.Richard Rowland - 2011 - Ratio 24 (3):340-348.
  5.  62
    Excellence and Means: On the Limits of Buck-Passing. [REVIEW]Johan Brännmark - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (3):301-315.
    The article explores the limits of buck-passing analysis in evaluating value or goodness. It talks about the inability of back-passers to account for two important types of value or goodness, which include excellence and means. The use of delimiting strategy in buck-passing analysis in order to be in possession of goodness is discussed.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6. An Augmented Buck-Passing Account of Reasons and Value: Scanlon and Crisp on What Stops the Buck.Philip Cook - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (4):490-507.
    Roger Crisp has inspired two important criticisms of Scanlon's buck-passing account of value. I defend buck-passing from the wrong kind of reasons criticism, and the reasons and the good objection. I support Rabinowicz and Rønnow-Rasmussen's dual role of reasons in refuting the wrong kind of reasons criticism, even where its authors claim it fails. Crisp's reasons and the good objection contends that the property of goodness is buck-passing in virtue of its formality. I argue that Crisp conflates general and formal (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  7
    An Augmented Buck-Passing Account of Reasons and Value: Scanlon and Crisp on What Stops the Buck: Philip Cook.Philip Cook - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (4):490-507.
    Roger Crisp has inspired two important criticisms of Scanlon's buck-passing account of value. I defend buck-passing from the wrong kind of reasons criticism, and the reasons and the good objection. I support Rabinowicz and Rønnow-Rasmussen's dual role of reasons in refuting the wrong kind of reasons criticism, even where its authors claim it fails. Crisp's reasons and the good objection contends that the property of goodness is buck-passing in virtue of its formality. I argue that Crisp conflates general and formal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Wrongness and Reasons.Ulrike Heuer - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):137 - 152.
    Is the wrongness of an action a reason not to perform it? Of course it is, you may answer. That an action is wrong both explains and justifies not doing it. Yet, there are doubts. Thinking that wrongness is a reason is confused, so an argument by Jonathan Dancy. There can’t be such a reason if ‘ϕ-ing is wrong’ is verdictive, and an all things considered judgment about what (not) to do in a certain situation. Such judgments are based (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  9.  64
    Why Pass Every Buck? On Skorupski's Buck-Passing Account of Normativity.Richard Rowland - 2011 - Ratio 24 (3):340-348.
  10.  52
    Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry (Review).R. M. Dancy - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):634-636.
    Coleridge wrote: “Every man is born an Aristotelian or a Platonist. I do not think it possible that anyone born an Aristotelian can become a Platonist; and I am sure that no born Platonist can ever change into an Aristotelian. They are two classes of man, beside which it is next to impossible to conceive a third.”Ancient Platonists could not be counted on to accept this kind of dichotomy, and that is what Karamanolis’s book is about. It covers Antiochus , (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  16
    Review: On A History of Women Philosophers, Vol. I. [REVIEW]R. M. Dancy - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (1):160 - 171.
    This book sets high standards for itself. Regrettably it fails to meet them: apart from a few displays of thorough and competent research, it is generally based on substandard scholarship.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  36
    Mystery to Me—a Delightful Mystery, After a While, but a Mystery Nonethe-Less. It Was Not Until a Few Months Before My Final Examinations That the Light Dawned and I Began to Feel at Home in the Subject. Still, I Went on to Do Graduate Work (in the Form of the Two-Year Oxford BPhil) Not so Much Out of Any Passionate Interest in Philosophy as From. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - 2013 - In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford University Press. pp. 337.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
    In this much-anticipated book, Jonathan Dancy offers the only available full-scale treatment of particularism in ethics, a view with which he has been associated for twenty years. Dancy now presents particularism as the view that the possibility of moral thought and judgement does not in any way depend on an adequate supply of principles. He grounds this claim on a form of reasons-holism, holding that what is a reason in one case need not be any reason in another, (...)
  14.  22
    Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives: Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts.Craig Boardman & Barry Bozeman - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (3):183-198.
    We provide a critical assessment of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) “broader impacts criterion” for peer review, which has met with resistance from the scientific community and been characterized as unlikely to have much positive effect due to poor implementation and adherence to the linear model heuristic for innovation. In our view, the weakness of NSF's approach owes less to these issues than to the misguided assumption that the peer review process can be used to leverage more societal value from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  11
    Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives: Passing the Buck on Science and Social Impacts.Barry Bozeman & Craig Boardman - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (3):183-198.
    We provide a critical assessment of the National Science Foundation's “broader impacts criterion” for peer review, which has met with resistance from the scientific community and been characterized as unlikely to have much positive effect due to poor implementation and adherence to the linear model heuristic for innovation. In our view, the weakness of NSF's approach owes less to these issues than to the misguided assumption that the peer review process can be used to leverage more societal value from research. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  5
    On Passing the Buck.D. M. Armstrong - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (3):346.
  17. Abandoning the Buck Passing Analysis of Final Value.Andrew E. Reisner - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):379 - 395.
    In this paper it is argued that the buck-passing analysis (BPA) of final value is not a plausible analysis of value and should be abandoned. While considering the influential wrong kind of reason problem and other more recent technical objections, this paper contends that there are broader reasons for giving up on buck-passing. It is argued that the BPA, even if it can respond to the various technical objections, is not an attractive analysis of final value. It is not attractive (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18. Resisting Buck-Passing Accounts of Prudential Value.Guy Fletcher - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):77-91.
    This paper aims to cast doubt upon a certain way of analysing prudential value (or good for ), namely in the manner of a ‘buck-passing’ analysis. It begins by explaining why we should be interested in analyses of good for and the nature of buck-passing analyses generally (§I). It moves on to considering and rejecting two sets of buck-passing analyses. The first are analyses that are likely to be suggested by those attracted to the idea of analysing good for in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19. Compunction, Buck-Passing, and Moral Reasons: Reply to Darwall.Dale Miller - manuscript
    In “’But It Would Be Wrong,’” Stephen Darwall advances a mixed view regarding “deontic buck-passing.” He holds that a wrong action’s “wrong-making features” are our reasons for reactive attitudes like blame; with respect to these reasons, the action’s wrongness “passes the buck” to these features. Yet the action’s being wrong is itself an additional reason for the agent not to do the action, Darwall contends, a “second-personal” moral reason. So with respect to reasons for action, the buck doesn’t get passed. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Naturalism and the Buck-Passing Account of Value.Francesco Orsi - 2006 - Philosophical Writings 32 (2):58-77.
    It has been thought that the prospects for non-naturalism about normativity may be significantly advanced if non-naturalists take the relation of being a reason as the basic normative entity, and so if, inter alia, they endorse a buck-passing account of value. This is thought to yield theoretical benefits regarding (i) the open question argument, (ii) the defence against the charge of queerness, and (iii) demands of parsimony. In the paper I contest these claims. Non- naturalists need not focus on reasons, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  26
    The Normative and the Evaluative: The Buck-Passing Account of Value.Richard Rowland - 2019 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Many have been attracted to the idea that for something to be good there just have to be reasons to favour it. This view has come to be known as the buck-passing account of value. According to this account, for pleasure to be good there need to be reasons for us to desire and pursue it. Likewise for liberty and equality to be values there have to be reasons for us to promote and preserve them. Extensive discussion has focussed on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. On Moral Properties.Jonathan Dancy - 1981 - Mind 90 (359):367-385.
  23. Should We Pass the Buck?Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:159-173.
    My topic is the relation between the right and the good. I introduce it by relating some aspects of the debate between various British intuitionists in the first half of the present century. In Principia Ethica G. E. Moore claimed that to be right is to be productive of the greatest good. He wrote ‘This use of “right”, as denoting what is good as a means, whether or not it be also good as an end, is indeed the use to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  24.  40
    On How to Act : Disjunctively.Jonathan Dancy - 2008 - In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 262--282.
  25.  40
    Discussion on the Importance of Making Things Right.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Ratio 17 (2):229–237.
    Critical notice of 'From metaphysics to ethics' by Frank Jackson.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  26.  43
    On Some of Aristotle's Second Thoughts About Substances: Matter.Russell Dancy - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (3):372-413.
  27.  54
    On The Logical And Moral Adequacy Of Particularism.Jonathan Dancy - 1999 - Theoria 65 (2-3):144-155.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  28.  18
    Guy Axtell has Taught Philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno, Since Receiving His Ph. D. In 1991. He has Written Articles on Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, American Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Religion. He is Currently at Work on a Book Entitled Pragmatic Pluralism: Understanding Philosophical Diversity. [REVIEW]Lawrence BonJour, Jonathan Dancy, Julia Driver, Alvin Goldman, John Greco & Christopher Hookway - 2000 - In Guy Axtell (ed.), Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  29. Prichard on Duty and 10 Ignorance of Fact.Jonathan Dancy - 2002 - In Phillip Stratton-Lake (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations. Oxford University Press. pp. 229.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  78
    On the Tracks of the Sceptic.Jonathan Dancy - 1984 - Analysis 44 (3):121 - 126.
  31.  43
    Discussion? On Knowing What One is Doing.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):239-247.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. On How to Be a Moral Rationalist.Jonathan Dancy - 2006 - Philosophical Books 47 (2):103-110.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  87
    Philosophers on Music: Experience, Meaning, and Work * Edited by Kathleen Stock.R. M. Dancy - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):207-210.
  34.  44
    On Some of Aristotle's First Thoughts About Substances.Russell Dancy - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (3):338-373.
  35.  16
    Prichard on Causing a Change.Jonathan Dancy - 2017 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80:127-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  59
    On Coherence Theories of Justification: Can an Empiricist Be a Coherentist?Jonathan Dancy - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (4):359 - 365.
  37.  8
    Berkeley's Doctrine of Notions: A Reconstruction Based on His Theory of Meaning. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (1):111.
  38.  7
    Review of 'Ethical Particularism: An Essay on Moral Reasons' by U. Kihlbom. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - unknown
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  4
    On How to Be a Moral Rationalist, a Contribution to a Symposium on C. Peacocke The Realm of Reason.Jonathan Dancy - unknown
  40.  5
    Berkeley: The Central Arguments and Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - 1987 - Philosophical Books 28 (1):14-17.
  41.  7
    Review: Discussion: On Knowing What One Is Doing. [REVIEW]Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 121 (3):239 - 247.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  1
    On How to Be a Moral Rationalist, a Contribution to a Symposium on C. Peacocke The Realm of Reason.Jonathan Dancy - unknown
  43.  1
    Discussion on the Importance of Making Things Right.Jonathan Dancy - unknown
    Critical notice of 'From metaphysics to ethics' by Frank Jackson.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Papers on Language and Logic the Proceedings of the Conference on the Philosophy of Language and Logic Held at the University of Keele in April, 1979.Tom Baldwin & Jonathan Dancy - 1979 - Keele University Library.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. 'For Here the Author is Annihilated': Reflections on Philosophical Aspects of the Use of the Dialogue Form in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion.Jonathan Dancy - 1995 - In Philosophical Dialogues: Plato, Hume, Wittgenstein. pp. 29-60.
  46. Papers on Language and Logic.Jonathan Dancy - 1983 - Mind 92 (365):140-143.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. "Reference, Truth and Reality: Essays on the Philosophy of Language", Edited by M. Platts. [REVIEW]J. Dancy - 1983 - Mind 92:288.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. With Friends, 'More is Going on Than Meets the Eye': A Discussion of Terry Penner and Christopher Rowe, Plato's Lysis.R. M. Dancy - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31:323-347.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons.Jonas Olson - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):295–300.
    According to T.M. Scanlon's buck-passing account of value, to be valuable is not to possess intrinsic value as a simple and unanalysable property, but rather to have other properties that provide reasons to take up an attitude in favour of their owner or against it. The 'wrong kind of reasons' objection to this view is that we may have reasons to respond for or against something without this having any bearing on its value. The challenge is to explain why such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   56 citations  
  50. Value, Reasons, and Oughts.Christine Tappolet - 2005 - In Maria E. Reicher & Johan C. Marek (eds.), Experience and Analysis, The Proceedings of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Öbv&hpt.
    What’s the relation between values and reasons for action ? According to some all reasons are grounded in values. If one adds to this the thought that values themselves depend on non-evaluative or factual features of things, one gets what one can call after Jonathan Dancy the “layer-cake conception”. According to others, we should replace the layer-cake picture by what he calls the “buck-passing account of values” (Scanlon 1998). The main characteristic of this conception is that it denies that (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 998