98 found
Order:
See also
Daniel Cohen
Colby College
Daniel B Cohen
Charles Sturt University
  1. Decision Theory for Agents with Incomplete Preferences.Adam Bales, Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):453-70.
    Orthodox decision theory gives no advice to agents who hold two goods to be incommensurate in value because such agents will have incomplete preferences. According to standard treatments, rationality requires complete preferences, so such agents are irrational. Experience shows, however, that incomplete preferences are ubiquitous in ordinary life. In this paper, we aim to do two things: (1) show that there is a good case for revising decision theory so as to allow it to apply non-vacuously to agents with incomplete (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  16
    Angelic Devil’s Advocates and the Forms of Adversariality.Katharina Stevens & Daniel H. Cohen - forthcoming - Topoi:1-14.
    Is argumentation essentially adversarial? The concept of a devil's advocate—a cooperative arguer who assumes the role of an opponent for the sake of the argument—serves as a lens to bring into clearer focus the ways that adversarial arguers can be virtuous and adversariality itself can contribute to argumentation's goals. It also shows the different ways arguments can be adversarial and the different ways that argumentation can be said to be "essentially" adversarial.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. Finking Frankfurt.Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):363--74.
    Michael Smith has resisted Harry Frankfurt's claim that moral responsibility does not require the ability to have done otherwise. He does this by claiming that, in Frankfurt cases, the ability to do otherwise is indeed present, but is a disposition that has been `finked' or masked by other factors. We suggest that, while Smith's account appears to work for some classic Frankfurt cases, it does not work for all. In particular, Smith cannot explain cases, such as the Willing Addict, where (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  4.  37
    Virtue, In Context.Daniel H. Cohen - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (4):471-485.
    Virtue argumentation theory provides the best framework for accommodating the notion of an argument that is “fully satisfying” in a robust and integrated sense. The process of explicating the notion of fully satisfying arguments requires expanding the concept of arguers to include all of an argument’s participants, including judges, juries, and interested spectators. And that, in turn, requires expanding the concept of an argument itself to include its entire context.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  5.  84
    Argument is War... And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation.Daniel H. Cohen - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2):177-188.
    The claim that argumentation has no proper role in either philosophy or education, and especially not in philosophical education, flies in the face of both conventional wisdom and traditional pedagogy. There is, however, something to be said for it because it is really only provocative against a certain philosophical backdrop. Our understanding of the concept "argument" is both reflected by and molded by the specific metaphor that argument-is-war, something with winners and losers, offensive and defensive moments, and an essentially adversarial (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  6.  30
    Arguments That Backfire.Daniel H. Cohen - 2005 - In D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (eds.), The Uses of Argument. OSSA. pp. 58-65.
    One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audiences – is a transfer of credibility from premises to conclusions. From a purely logical perspective, neither dubious premises nor fallacious inference should lower the credibility of the target conclusion. Nevertheless, some arguments do backfire this way. Dialectical and rhetorical considerations come into play. Three inter-related conclusions emerge from a catalogue of hapless arguers and backfiring arguments. First, there are advantages to paying attention to arguers and their (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  7.  23
    Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy.Daniel Cohen - 2004 - University Press of America.
    In this book, Daniel Cohen explores the connections between arguments and metaphors, most pronounced in philosophy because philosophical discourse is both thoroughly metaphorical and replete with argumentation. Cohen covers the nature of arguments, their modes and structures, and the principles of their evaluation, and addresses the nature of metaphors, their place in language and thought, and their connections to arguments, identifying and reconciling arguments' and metaphors' respective roles in philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  8.  94
    Introduction: Virtues and Arguments.Andrew Aberdein & Daniel H. Cohen - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):339-343.
    It has been a decade since the phrase virtue argumentation was introduced, and while it would be an exaggeration to say that it burst onto the scene, it would be just as much of an understatement to say that it has gone unnoticed. Trying to strike the virtuous mean between the extremes of hyperbole and litotes, then, we can fairly characterize it as a way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that has steadily attracted more and more attention from argumentation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  23
    The Attraction of the Ideal has No Traction on the Real: On Adversariality and Roles in Argument.Katharina Stevens & Daniel Cohen - 2018 - Argumentation and Advocacy:forthcoming.
    If circumstances were always simple and all arguers were always exclusively concerned with cognitive improvement, arguments would probably always be cooperative. However, we have other goals and there are other arguers, so in practice the default seems to be adversarial argumentation. We naturally inhabit the heuristically helpful but cooperation-inhibiting roles of proponents and opponents. We can, however, opt for more cooperative roles. The resources of virtue argumentation theory are used to explain when proactive cooperation is permissible, advisable, and even mandatory (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10. Rational Capacities, Resolve, and Weakness of Will.Daniel Cohen & Toby Handfield - 2010 - Mind 119 (476):907 - 932.
    In this paper we present an account of practical rationality and weakness of will in terms of rational capacities. We show how our account rectifies various shortcomings in Michael Smith's related theory. In particular, our account is capable of accommodating cases of weak-willed behaviour that are not `akratic', or otherwise contrary to the agent's better judgement. Our account differs from Smith's primarily by incorporating resolve: a third rational capacity for resolute maintenance of one's intentions. We discuss further two ways to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  73
    The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of (Technologically Enhanced) Argumentative Pluralism.Daniel H. Cohen - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):179-189.
    Technology has made argumentation rampant. We can argue whenever we want. With social media venues for every interest, we can also argue about whatever we want. To some extent, we can select our opponents and audiences to argue with whomever we want. And we can argue however we want, whether in carefully reasoned, article-length expositions, real-time exchanges, or 140-character polemics. The concepts of arguing, arguing well, and even being an arguer have evolved with this new multiplicity and diversity; theory needs (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  12.  30
    Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation Theory.Daniel H. Cohen - 2007 - In David Hitchcock (ed.), Dissensus and the search for common ground. OSSA.
    Virtue epistemology was modeled on virtue ethics theories to transfer their ethical insights to epistemology. VE has had great success: broadening our perspective, providing new answers to traditional questions, and raising exciting new questions. I offer a new argument for VE based on the concept of cognitive achievements, a broader notion than purely epistemic achievements. The argument is then extended to cognitive transformations, especially the cognitive transformations brought about by argumentation.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  13.  25
    An Actualist Explanation of the Procreation Asymmetry.Daniel Cohen - forthcoming - Utilitas:1-20.
    While morality prohibits us from creating miserable children, it does not require us to create happy children. I offer an actualist explanation of this apparent asymmetry. Assume that for every possible world W, there is a distinct set of permissibility facts determined by the welfare of those who exist in W. Moral actualism says that actual-world permissibility facts should determine one's choice between worlds. But if one doesn't know which world is actual, one must aim for subjective rightness and maximize (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  10
    Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires That We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.
    Psychological and neuroscientific data suggest that a great deal, perhaps even most, of our reasoning turns out to be rationalizing. The reasons we give for our positions are seldom either the real reasons or the effective causes of why we have those positions. We are not as rational as we like to think. A second, no less disheartening observation is that while we may be very effective when it comes to giving reasons, we are not that good at getting reasons. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  29
    Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires That We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.
    Psychological and neuroscientific data suggest that a great deal, perhaps even most, of our reasoning turns out to be rationalizing. The reasons we give for our positions are seldom either the real reasons or the effective causes of why we have those positions. We are not as rational as we like to think. A second, no less disheartening observation is that while we may be very effective when it comes to giving reasons, we are not that good at getting reasons. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  7
    Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires That We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.
    Psychological and neuroscientific data suggest that a great deal, perhaps even most, of our reasoning turns out to be rationalizing. The reasons we give for our positions are seldom either the real reasons or the effective causes of why we have those positions. We are not as rational as we like to think. A second, no less disheartening observation is that while we may be very effective when it comes to giving reasons, we are not that good at getting reasons. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  40
    Evaluating Arguments and Making Meta-Arguments.Daniel H. Cohen - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (2).
    This paper explores the outlines of a framework for evaluating arguments. Among the factors to take into account are the strength of the arguers' inferences, the level of their engagement with objections raised by other interlocutors, and their effectiveness in rationally persuading their target audiences. Some connections among these can be understood only in the context of meta-argumentation and meta-rationality. The Principle of Meta-Rationality (PMR)--that reasoning rationally includes reasoning about rationality-is used to explain why it can be rational to resist (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  18.  42
    The Problem of Counterpossibles.Daniel H. Cohen - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):91-101.
  19. Essays on Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Nick Trakakis & Daniel Cohen (eds.) - 2008 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
  20.  24
    Are There Methods of Informal Logic?Hans V. Hansen & Daniel H. Cohen - unknown
    This presentation seeks to understand informal logic as a set of methods for the logical evaluation of natural language arguments. Some of the methods identified are the fallacies method, deductivism, warrantism and argument schemes. A framework for comparing the adequacy of the methods is outlined consisting of the following categories: learner- and user-efficiency, subjective and objective reliability, and scope. Within this framework, it is also possible to compare informal and formal logic.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21.  22
    Responsibility From the Margins, by David Shoemaker: New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, Pp. Xv + 262, US$50.Daniel Cohen - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):840-841.
  22.  38
    What Virtue Argumentation Theory Misses: The Case of Compathetic Argumentation.Daniel H. Cohen & George Miller - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):451-460.
    While deductive validity provides the limiting upper bound for evaluating the strength and quality of inferences, by itself it is an inadequate tool for evaluating arguments, arguing, and argumentation. Similar remarks can be made about rhetorical success and dialectical closure. Then what would count as ideal argumentation? In this paper we introduce the concept of cognitive compathy to point in the direction of one way to answer that question. It is a feature of our argumentation rather than my argument or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  67
    A Reply to Cahn.Daniel H. Cohen - 1988 - Analysis 48 (2):109 - 110.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24.  25
    Just and Unjust Wars - and Just and Unjust Arguments.Daniel H. Cohen - 2003 - In IL@25: Proceedings of the 2003 Meetings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
    For all its problems, there is still much to be gleaned from the argument-is-war paradigm. Much of the conceptual vocabulary that we use to talk about wars is commonly applied to arguments. Other concepts in the war-cluster can also be readily adapted to arguments. Some parts, of course, do not seem to apply so easily, if at all. Of most interest here are those war-concepts that have not been deployed in thinking about arguments but really should be because of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  43
    A New Axiomatization of Belnap's Conditional Assertion.Daniel H. Cohen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (1):124-132.
  26.  29
    L’assimilation par la connaissance dans le De Principiis de Damascius.Daniel Cohen - 2010 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 66 (1):61-83.
    Dans son De Principiis, Damascius propose une définition originale de la «connaissance» . Les développements doctrinaux qui y sont exposés semblent rompre avec la conception plotinienne, principalement issue de l’exégèse du De Anima d’Aristote, lequel envisageait la connaissance, du moins dans sa modalité supérieure qu’est l’intellection , comme une «identité» du connaissant et du connu. Cette étude se propose de clarifier la gnoséologie de Damascius et de montrer que la connaissance y est envisagée comme une altérité surmontée sans pour autant (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  69
    Creating the Best Possible World: Some Problems From Parfit.Daniel Cohen - 2009 - Sophia 48 (2):143-150.
    It is sometimes argued that if God were to exist, then the actual world would be the best possible world. However, given that the actual world is clearly not the best possible world, then God doesn’t exist. In response, some have argued that the world could always be improved with the creation of new people and that there is thus no best possible world. I argue that this reasoning gives rise to an instance of Parfit’s mere addition paradox and should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  66
    Why a Victim's Age is Irrelevant When Assessing the Wrongness of Killing.Daniel Cohen & Morgan Luck - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):396-401.
    abstract Intuitively, all killings are equally wrong, no matter how old one's victim. In this paper we defend this claim — The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis — against a challenge presented by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Lippert-Rasmussen shows The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis to be incompatible with two further theses: The Unequal Wrongness of Renderings Unconscious Thesis and The Equivalence Thesis. Lippert-Rasmussen argues that, of the three, The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis is the least defensible. He suggests that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  54
    Openness, Accidentality and Responsibility.Daniel Cohen - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (3):581-597.
    In this paper, I present a novel argument for scepticism about moral responsibility. Unlike traditional arguments, this argument doesn’t depend on contingent empirical claims about the truth or falsity of causal determinism. Rather, it is argued that the conceptual conditions of responsibility are jointly incompatible. In short, when an agent is responsible for an action, it must be true both that the action was non-accidental, and that it was open to the agent not to perform that action. However, as I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  11
    On What Cannot Be.Daniel Cohen - 1990 - In J. Dunn & A. Gupta (eds.), Truth or Consequences. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 123--132.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  11
    ‘Cognitive Systemic Dichotomization’ in Public Argumentation and Controversies.Marcelo Dascal, Amnon Knoll & Daniel Cohen - unknown
    We describe and analyze an important cognitive obstacle in inter- and intra-community ar-gumentation processes, which we propose to call 'Cognitive Systemic Dichotomization'. This social phenomenon consists in the collective use of shared cognitive patterns based upon dichotomous schemati-zation of knowledge, values, and affection. We discuss the formative role of CSD on a community’s collec-tive cognition, identity, and public discourse, as well as the challenges it raises to reasoned argumentation, and how different approaches to argumentation undertake to face this obstacle to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  15
    Commentary on Finocchiaro.Daniel H. Cohen - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  34
    Putnam, Truth and Informal Logic.Jeffrey L. Kasser & Daniel Cohen - 2002 - Philosophica 70:85-108.
  34.  2
    Academic Arguments.Daniel Cohen & George Thomas Goodnight - unknown
    Calling an argument “merely academic” impugns its seriousness, belittles its substance, dis-misses its importance, and deflates hope of resolution, while ruling out negotiation and compromise. How-ever, “purely academic” argumentation, as an idealized limit case, is a valuable analytical tool for argumen-tation theorists because while the telos of academic argumentation may be cognitive, it is cognitive in the service of a community, which, in turn, is a community in the service of the cognitive.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  26
    Arguing With God.Daniel H. Cohen - 2001
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. Computability and Logic.Daniel E. Cohen - 1987 - Halsted Press.
  37.  20
    The Word as Will and Idea.Daniel H. Cohen - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:126-140.
    According to the semantics in Wittgenstein's Tractatus, a picture and what is pictured must have the same logical form. However necessary that may be, it cannot suffice to make one fact a picture of another. The grounds for the pictorial relation, it is argued, must be found in the transcendental will. Following a suggestion by Ramsey, the semantic resources of the Tractatus are used to construct a new interpretation of propositions as equivalence classes of facts. The nature of the involvement (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  26
    Putting Paradoxes to Pedagogical Use in Philosophy.Daniel H. Cohen - 1985 - Teaching Philosophy 8 (4):309-317.
  39.  3
    Assertion and Conditionals.Daniel Cohen - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (4):1051-1052.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  2
    Commentary on Schwed.Daniel H. Cohen - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41.  26
    Has Smith Solved the Moral Problem?Wylie Breckenridge & Daniel Blair Cohen - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (4):463-472.
    Michael Smith attempts to solve the moral problem by arguing that our moral beliefs constitute a rational constraint on our desires. In particular, Smith defends the ‘practicality requirement’, which says that rational agents who believe that an action is right must have some desire to perform that action. We clarify and examine Smith’s argument. We argue that, for the argument to be sound, it must make two crucial assumptions about the rational agent in question: that facts about her desires are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  13
    Traduction des Textes Sur la Doctrine Stoïcienne du Mélange Total.Nicolette Brout, Michèle Broze, Daniel Cohen, Bernard Collette, Lambros Couloubaritsis, Sylvain Delcomminette, Sabrina Inowlocki, Joachim Lacrosse, Mihaïl Nasta & Annick Stevens - 2006 - Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 24 (2):61-92.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  14
    Anthony Appiah. Assertion and Conditionals. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Etc. 1985, Xiii + 265 Pp. [REVIEW]Daniel Cohen - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (4):1051-1052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  50
    Review of Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. [REVIEW]Daniel Cohen - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):444 – 445.
    Review: Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology Jeanette Kennett New York Oxford University Press 2001 viii + 229 Hardback US$45 By Jeanette Kennett. Oxford University Press. New York. Pp. viii + 229. Hardback:US$45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  2
    Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology.Daniel Cohen - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):444-445.
    Book Information Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology. Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology Jeanette Kennett New York Oxford University Press 2001 viii + 229 Hardback US$45 By Jeanette Kennett. Oxford University Press. New York. Pp. viii + 229. Hardback:US$45.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Aperçu de la réception de la doctrine stoïcienne du mélange total dans le Néoplatonisme après Plotin.Daniel Cohen - 2007 - Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 25 (2):67-100.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  2
    A filosofia do mito em Plotino e Proclo: um estudo comparativo.Daniel Cohen & Joachim Lacrosse - 2010 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 5:77-82.
    This contribution resumes the main conclusions of a common work of philosophical comparatism between the Neoplatonism of Plotinus and Proclus, which is based on the examination of their respective reception of the traditional metaphysical use of anciant myths. This article consists in the examination of two important “definitions” of myth collected in the Enneads of Plotinus and Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic. On the basis of these analyses, it is possible to assert that, for Plotinus as for Proclus, the muthos (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  2
    A filosofia do mito em Plotino e Proclo: um estudo comparativo.Daniel Cohen & Joachim Lacrosse - 2010 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 5:77-82.
    This contribution resumes the main conclusions of a common work of philosophical comparatism between the Neoplatonism of Plotinus and Proclus, which is based on the examination of their respective reception of the traditional metaphysical use of anciant myths. This article consists in the examination of two important “definitions” of myth collected in the Enneads of Plotinus and Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic. On the basis of these analyses, it is possible to assert that, for Plotinus as for Proclus, the muthos (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  8
    Art, Public Et Marché.Daniel Cohen - 1995 - Archives de Philosophie du Droit 40:220-233.
    L'expression marché de l'art, couramment employée, le plus souvent au singulier, soulève une foule de questions, qui vont de l'opposition que l'on établit instinctivement et sans doute un peu vite entre l'art et l'économie marchande, à l'existence d'une multitude de disciplines artistiques différentes, s'adressant des publics, en passant par le caractère de bien public de l'oeuvre, par les formes très particulières que peut revêtir sa consommation et par la présence sous-jacente, anticipée, des générations futures, notamment dans les règles juridiques et (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. A Reply to Steven M Cahn on Divestiture.Daniel H. Cohen - 1988 - Analysis 48 (2):109-110.
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 98